The Daily Guardian
  • Home/
  • Viral News/
  • Internet Buzzes Over Photoshop Mistakes in Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez Wedding Photos

Internet Buzzes Over Photoshop Mistakes in Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez Wedding Photos

Internet users spot glaring edits in Bezos-Sanchez wedding photos, raising concerns over image authenticity and AI usage.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Internet Buzzes Over Photoshop Mistakes in Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez Wedding Photos

Social media users have raised eyebrows over multiple inconsistencies in the official photographs from Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez’s extravagant wedding in Venice. Internet users and tech influencers noted that several images appeared to have been poorly edited — leading to speculation that advanced AI tools or sloppy Photoshop work were used to enhance the photos.

Tech influencer Allison McSorley made one of the most startling observations when she posted a viral Instagram video exposing the dubious aspects of the wedding pictures. The buttons on Sanchez’s custom Dolce & Gabbana gown in one picture, she noted, unexpectedly vanish halfway down, implying post-production tampering.

“Same dress, same day. Totally different details,” said McSorley, drawing attention to how the gown’s buttons appear full-length in one shot but vanish midway in another.

Missing Fingers, Warped Hands, and Chair Legs

McSorley’s critique didn’t stop at the bridal gown. She noted several anomalies in the background of the images, including a person whose hand appears to have missing fingers, and a chair with a leg that’s oddly cut off. These discrepancies, she said, hinted at aggressive photo manipulation.

She also claimed to have spotted a safety pin embedded in the bride’s custom-made gown — an unusual detail for such a high-profile, designer-backed event.

Vogue’s Spread Also Comes Under Fire

Even Vogue, which published an exclusive spread of Sanchez’s wedding look, wasn’t spared criticism. McSorley highlighted how the lace on Sanchez’s dress appeared to blur or disappear altogether in some photos.
“There’s massive blur where there should be detail.
The lace just disappears,” she commented in her video.

Sharing the various errors in an Instagram post, McSorley wrote:

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Allison McSorley (@safeonlinefutures)

“Look closer: the dress changes between photos. Fingers are missing. Lace is blurry. And every image was amplified by legacy media outlets like Vogue.”

Online Reactions: Concern, Mockery, and Skepticism

Her breakdown triggered a wave of online responses, with her video gathering over half a million views. Some viewers saw this as a sign of increasing AI manipulation of media.

“Been trying to warn about AI for many years and the scariest part to me is… no one cares,” one commenter said.

Another person questioned the legitimacy of the entire event, writing: “I’m wondering if the whole thing was fake now? A safety pin in what’s probably a $50,000 dress when there’s probably 3 seamstresses on stand by? Nope.”

Not Everyone’s Convinced

Still, some users took a more balanced view, arguing that editing wedding pictures — even celebrity ones — is not uncommon.

“Brides have been editing their pictures since at least 20 years ago when I got married… It’s our one day and we love them to look perfect. You’re reaching boo,” one user commented.

Another added, “I know someone who was at the wedding… it happened. I think it’s just poor editing.”

A Broader Concern on Visual Manipulation

A wider discussion over visual authenticity in the era of artificial intelligence and digital enhancement has been spurred by the incident. The Bezos-Sanchez wedding images have become the latest flashpoint in the online discussion over reality versus curating, whether it was due to sloppy Photoshop work or the increasing usage of AI image generation.

This episode serves as a warning about the thin line separating glamor and distortion, as celebrities increasingly rely on computer retouching to achieve perfection.