On May 13, 2025, the Trump administration declared a new round of funding reductions to Harvard University, citing what it called the “dark problem” of anti-Semitism. The new reductions amount to $450 million, in addition to the prior $2.2 billion cut announced a week ago.
It is part of the administration’s larger push to combat claimed anti-Semitism at American colleges and counter what it views as an exaggeration of diversity initiatives.
Trump Administration’s Reaction to Charges of Discrimination
The US Department of Health and Human Services explained the cuts by criticizing Harvard for being a “breeding ground for virtue signaling and discrimination.” The administration’s Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism specifically criticized the university for failing to clamp down on anti-Semitism.
The organization referenced continuing reports of insults, physical attacks, and intimidation against Jewish students. The Trump administration has concentrated on rolling back policies it says prioritize diversity over merit.
Harvard’s Defense and Reforms
Conversely, Harvard has vehemently disputed the claims of the administration. The university sued, stating the cuts are an illegal intrusion in its operations. Harvard President Alan Garber admitted that the university was experiencing difficulties, especially following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel. He emphasized the university’s continued reforms that seek to eradicate hate, including anti-Semitism.
Alan Garber further stressed that Harvard hires students based on individuality, not race. Harvard asserts it has commonality with the administration regarding matters such as intellectual diversity.
Widening Chasm Between Harvard and Trump Administration
The increasing schism between Harvard and the Trump administration highlights the expanding ideological chasm in the U.S. regarding race, diversity, and free speech on campus. The administration’s efforts to fight what it perceives as politically correct measures may have sweeping implications for American colleges.
Harvard’s legal responses, on the other hand, indicate it will continue to fight these actions as attacks on academic freedom.
Battle for the Future of Higher Education
This conflict is not just about money; it’s an argument over the future of American higher education. As each side digs in, the result might transform the role of universities in dealing with challenges of discrimination, diversity, and political ideology.
The squeeze on Harvard to bend its values to conform to the administration’s wishes will continue to ratchet up, putting the university and the larger academic community in a tough spot.