Latest President Donald Trump News | Top President Donald Trump News Headlines Today | Today India news | Breaking President Donald Trump News Today | English President Donald Trump News Headlines - TheDailyGuardian

Why Can’t Trump Unite Republicans Around His First Big Bill?

July 3, 2025, 3:54 pm

House Republicans are still in a fraught overnight standoff as President Donald Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson hurry to persuade almost a dozen GOP defectors, bringing Trump’s ambitious new domestic policy legislation perilously close to collapse, according to CNN reporting.

Speaker Johnson pledged to keep the procedural vote open “as long as it takes”, while House leadership labors around the clock to round up support and get the legislation moving. The stakes are high—this bill is Trump’s first big legislative win in his second term.

GOP Holdouts Stall Agenda of Trump

The standoff focuses on a coalition of right-wing Republican lawmakers who still oppose the bill. Their resistance risks derailing Trump’s legislative momentum in the early part of his term and highlights fissures in the Republican caucus.

“If the vote implodes,” CNN writes, “it would be a serious setback to Trump’s second-term agenda and compel GOP leaders to reconsider their approach.

Trump and his aides have been assuring Republican leadership for weeks that he could win over the recalcitrant conservative bloc that remained against the package. With the clock ticking, though, Trump and his officials have begun last-ditch efforts to turn around minds and save the vote.

White House Hosts GOP Lawmakers in Last-Ditch Talks

CNN reports that bipartisan groups of GOP lawmakers were summoned to the White House to protest the Senate-passed bill, with the hope that direct conversation would produce some kind of breakthrough. These sit-downs underscore Trump’s engagement and urgency to garner support for the legislation.

Meanwhile, Speaker Mike Johnson is dealing with one of the toughest leadership tests of his speakership. With a hair-thin Republican majority, Johnson has to hold together a party divided between mainstream conservatives and hardline elements suspicious of the bill’s content and sources.

Bill’s Future Uncertain Amid Internal Party Divisions

As the standoff drags on into the evening, the future of what Trump has referred to as his “big, beautiful bill” remains uncertain. Even if the House passes the procedural vote, lawmakers must still overcome several more hurdles before they can fully pass the bill.

The situation reflects the continued challenge Republican leaders have in containing their caucus and pursuing Trump’s policy agendas, even with control of the House, according to analysts.

Republicans Hide $3.8 Trillion Cost in Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Using ‘Magic Trick’

July 1, 2025, 7:43 pm

Republicans are employing a book-keeping trick to conceal a whopping $3.8 trillion in expenses from President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill. Trump has requested Congress to enact the bill by Friday. The bill vows tax cuts and more spending, but at an enormous price to the federal deficit and major welfare programs.

Senate Republicans cast a vote to make Trump’s 2017 tax cuts “permanent,” faking that extending them will have no cost. In practice, this action merely conceals the losses in revenues. The bill has been criticised by critics like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for employing “fake math” and for endangering healthcare and food subsidies for millions.

The Tax Cut Gimmick

The centrepiece of the controversy is the action of treating the 2017 tax cuts as permanent. The tax cuts were scheduled to expire, and making them last longer should be considered a cost. But Republicans contend that since they are “already permanent,” extending them doesn’t cost anything extra. This reasoning enables them to take $3.8 trillion off the bill’s cost.

However, in reality, extending these tax breaks results in the government forfeiting that tax money, whether it appears in official projections or not.

Increased Deficits, Fewer Benefits

The Congressional Budget Office reports that the Senate bill will contribute $3.3 trillion to the federal deficit over ten years. This is more than $1 trillion higher than the estimated $2.4 trillion for the House bill.

In addition to cutting taxes on the rich, the bill takes away essential programs. Official estimates project 11.8 million Americans losing their health insurance. The bill also slashes food aid, hitting close to a million more individuals than the House bill.

Schumer: Giveaway to Billionaires

Senator Schumer has criticized the Republicans for ramming through the most costly bill in the history of the United States. He cautioned that the bill offers tax benefits to billionaires while eliminating Medicaid, SNAP benefits, and secure jobs for millions of Americans.

“Republicans are doing something the Senate has never done before,” Schumer said. “They are using fake math to pass a bill that will hurt working families and help the ultra-rich.”

Gamble With Public Trust

If enacted, Trump’s tax would reconfigure federal spending and social protections for decades. Yet the accounting gimmicks used to hide its cost should give lawmakers pause. As the Senate heads toward a vote, the urgency builds to reveal the full economic cost and call for transparency. The consequences—for tens of millions of Americans—could not be greater.

Was Operation Midnight Hammer Too Late? Did Iran Clear Key Sites in Advance?

June 23, 2025, 12:26 pm

The United States conducted Operation Midnight Hammer against Iran’s most important nuclear sites at Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan. President Donald Trump characterized the airstrikes as causing “monumental damage” to Iran’s nuclear program. Newly released satellite images and expert assessments indicate Iran might have known the attacks were coming and shifted sensitive nuclear components beforehand.

Imagery Shows Suspicious Activity Before Strikes

US military officials reported that they were still determining the true scope of damage wrought by the operation. Satellite imagery examined by a number of analysts, however, suggests that Iran most likely conducted swift logistical maneuvers before the attacks.

Photos taken by Maxar Technologies, shared on X (formerly Twitter) and reported by Associated Press (AP), indicated several trucks assembling at the entrance of the Fordo nuclear facility before the strike. Experts also termed this a probable “logistics shuffle,” meaning Iran might have moved critical materials.

This seems important. Before the U.S strikes on Esfahan, Natanz and Fordow, @Maxar satellite images showed a possible increase in logistics at Fordow – 16 trucks gathered on 19- 20 June with heavy machinery near the entrance to the main facility. pic.twitter.com/dakj6aFbVS

— John Pollock (@John_Pollock22) June 22, 2025

Additional scrutiny by the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security mentioned increased activity at Iran’s Isfahan site. Satellite photos captured by Airbus on the Friday preceding the attack seem to depict trucks dumping soil into tunnels, hypothesized by the group to indicate Iran’s efforts to fill in or cover up tunnel entrances.

Tunnel Entrances Collapsed in Iran, But Questions Remain

The Institute said that the US strike was probably aimed at tunnel entrances. “A minimum of three of the four tunnel entrances have collapsed. The status of the fourth one is unknown,” the report quoted. The group further indicated that Iran had possibly filled up tunnels at Fordo in advance of the strike, making it even more difficult to measure the damage done.

The same group concluded that the US cruise missile attack at Isfahan probably destroyed Iran’s uranium conversion plant, which processes natural uranium into uranium hexafluoride, a central material employed in nuclear enrichment.

Trump’s Daring Assertions and Regime Change Rhetoric

President Trump trumpeted the success of the attack on his site, Truth Social, declaring, “The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!”

He also began to discuss regime change in Tehran, stating, “It’s not politically correct to use the term, ‘Regime Change,’ but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn’t there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!”

Iran Responds with Threats of Retaliation

Iran, in turn, blamed the United States for undermining diplomacy. Iran’s military said it would decide the “timing, nature, and scale” of its proportional response.

In his initial reaction to the attacks, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei targeted Israel, but not the United States by name, “The punishment continues. The Zionist enemy has made a grave mistake, committed a major crime, and it must be punished — and it is being punished.

As tensions in the region rise, the world eagerly waits to observe how Iran reacts and if the real effect of Operation Midnight Hammer will live up to bold Washington claims.

US Judge Extends Block on Trump’s Order Against Harvard Foreign Students

June 17, 2025, 5:17 am

President Donald Trump had earlier moved to ban foreign students from entering the US to attend Harvard University, citing national security concerns. The move was seen as part of a broader political conflict with the Ivy League institution, which had resisted various federal demands under his administration.

Court Intervention

On Monday, US District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston extended a temporary restraining order on Trump’s proclamation until June 23, while she considers Harvard’s request for a preliminary injunction. This follows an earlier restraining order granted on June 5, which was initially set to expire on Thursday.

Harvard’s Legal Stand

During the court hearing, Harvard’s lawyer Ian Gershengorn argued that the Trump administration had exceeded its authority and was using international students as pawns. Gershengorn accused the administration of retaliation against Harvard for not complying with conservative-driven federal directives.

Previous Government Actions

The conflict escalated in April when Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem demanded records from Harvard regarding foreign students’ activities. Dissatisfied with the response, the Department of Homeland Security revoked Harvard’s certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program on May 22.

This action severely impacted Harvard’s ability to attract international students, prompting the university to file a lawsuit, stating:

“Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard.”

Impact on Students and Global Reputation

The revocation had significant implications for graduate programs that rely heavily on foreign students. In response, international institutions, including universities in Hong Kong, extended invitations to affected students.

Harvard has stated that while it has made efforts to combat antisemitism, it will not compromise on its “core, legally-protected principles” in the face of federal pressure.

Net Immigration Turns Negative Under Trump — A First in 50 Years

June 16, 2025, 6:58 pm

For the first time in half a century, net immigration has turned negative in the United States and under hardline immigration agenda of President Donald Trump, more people are now leaving the country than arriving. The administration views this shift as a win but economists warn it could weaken the US economy, drive up inflation, and deepen labour shortages across key industries.

The point of change arrives as the Trump administration intensifies workplace raids and border crackdowns. Uprisings have erupted in cities such as Los Angeles, where wholesale deportations have incited outrage. But experts maintain the actual cause of the shift isn’t solely deportations — it’s the steep decline in legal immigration flows.

American Enterprise Institute’s Stan Veuger said, “It’s not so much about deportations. It’s really just that inflows are off so much, not just at the southern border, but also through various legal programs.”

The foreign-born labor force has already declined by more than 1 million individuals since March, based on Labour Department statistics.

Trump Team Stands Firm

In the face of increasing economic distress, the Trump administration is standing firm. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson recently shared with The Washington Post, “If you are here in the United States illegally, you will be deported. This is the commitment President Trump made to the American people, and the Administration is committed to keeping it.”

Trump and Vice President JD Vance contend on the stump that the country must carry out mass deportation to relieve pressure on housing and employment.

Economic Risks Mount

A new Brookings Institution paper by economists Wendy Edelberg and Tara Watson, as well as Veuger, predicts a sharp increase in the probability of negative net immigration in 2025. The study emphasizes long-term danger in this change.

In 2024, immigration had driven the percentage of foreign-born employees to record levels. Fewer immigrants now enter and more depart, threatening to hurt crucial sectors such as agriculture, construction, and hospitality—even though their earlier boost had enabled the US to bounce back from the pandemic.

Companies also anticipate surging labour expenses as they fight to fill the void left by departed workers. The writers caution that if the Trump administration succeeds in its target of removing 1 million migrants this year, the financial cost could increase.

The Bigger Picture

This is not the first time that America has witnessed migration decline. The previous steep decline happened in the 2008 financial crisis when several Mexican immigrants departed. The consequence was a diminished workforce and weakened recovery.

Now, economists fear the country will repeat the same pattern. As net immigration went negative under Trump, the U.S. is potentially walking into a slower growth and increasing cost future — one deportation at a time.

“No Red Lines”: Al-Qaeda Leader Calls for Attacks on Trump, US Officials Over Gaza War

June 11, 2025, 4:38 pm

In a shocking 34-minute propaganda video called “Inciting the Believers,” the new leader of Al-Qaeda, Sa’ad bin Atef al-Awlaki, has issued a call to assassinate key American leaders, including President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and billionaire business magnate Elon Musk. The call for assassination, released by AQAP’s media arm, is a disturbing heightening of anti-American rhetoric by the group amid the ongoing Israel-Gaza crisis.

“Do not ask anyone to kill infidel Americans,” al-Awlaki stated in the video, contradictorily circulated far and wide across jihadist Telegram channels. He called upon Muslim citizens in the United States to “take revenge” against America for supporting Israel, naming prominent political and business figures specifically targeted.

Alongside Trump and Vance, the AQAP chief also nominated Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk. This called for his followers to attack these individuals and their families, “Go after them and their families and all those who have any ties or are close to the politicians of the White House.”

BREAKING: Al-Qaeda leader, Sa’ad Bin Atef Al-Awlaki, has just now called for American Muslims to wage Jihad on US soil and to assassinate President Donald Trump, Vice President J.D. Vance, and Elon musk, others. pic.twitter.com/1QQzKOWVd9

— Simon Ateba (@simonateba) June 10, 2025

The video also encouraged antisemitic violence and glorified previous attempts to kill Trump. “Go after the scum of the earth and its greatest criminals,” al-Awlaki declared. “These are Trump and his vice president, his advisor, and his supporters in terms of finance, administration, and technology.”

No Red Lines After Gaza, Warns AQAP Leader

Al-Awlaki cautioned that there are “no red lines” after what he termed as atrocities in Gaza. “Do not leave a single safe location for Jews, just as they have not left any homes, shelters, or refuge for the Palestinians,” he advised. “Even hospitals are being bombed over the heads of the sick and wounded, and the heads of the women, children, and elderly. Take revenge.”

The US State Department has already put a $6 million reward on the head of al-Awlaki, who took over the reins of AQAP in March 2024. The US government still designates AQAP as a foreign terrorist organization.

Why the Mexican Flag Is the Defining Symbol of the Los Angeles Protests

June 11, 2025, 12:57 pm

Mexican flags are rising as a symbol of strength in the current protests that are rocking Los Angeles, in the wake of a series of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrests. Demonstrators have taken to the streets, brandishing the green, white, and red flag as a symbol of solidarity with immigrants and Mexican pride.

The protests kicked off after ICE authorities arrested 118 immigrants last week as part of President Donald Trump’s efforts to impose harder-line immigration measures. As a result, protests broke out in cities throughout the city, such as Los Angeles, Compton, and Paramount, swiftly building up and making waves.

Mexican Flag Becomes a Symbol of Resistance

Protesters are openly flying the Mexican flag from detention centers to the LA Sheriff’s office. It is more than a badge of defiance to many—it is a badge of cultural pride and resistance against what they perceive as targeted enforcement.

“They’re the kids and the grandkids of immigrants,” said Chris Zepeda-Millán, a professor of Chicano studies at UCLA. “We’re not going to let you make us embarrassed of where our grandparents and parents are from.”

Protesters are now waving the Mexican flag, departing from previous immigration protests where they commonly brandished American flags to express their identification with American values. Today, protesters seem to be reclaiming their heritage.

The Trump administration has, however, referred to such performances as “insurrection.”

Curfew Issued Amid Rising Tensions in Los Angeles

Isolating stores and two police stations, after hearing of lootings and acts of vandalism amidst protests, a citywide curfew was instituted by Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. “We hit a tipping point,” she said, following 23 businesses being looted. The curfew ran from 8 p.m. Tuesday to 6 a.m. Wednesday.

At least 60 individuals have been detained as of today, according to NBC News. This hasn’t dampened protests, however, which continue to grow, with the Mexican flag taking center stage in the visuals.

Deep Roots of Mexican Identity in the City

Los Angeles has a large population of Mexican-Americans, many of whom are the descendants of immigrants who came to the country during World War I to fulfill labor needs. Upward of 900,000 undocumented immigrants now live in LA, so immigration policy is very personal.

Historically, the city has strong roots in Mexico. Spanish colonists established Los Angeles in 1781 as El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de Los Ángeles. After the Mexican-American War, the United States acquired the city through the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, and it became part of the US in 1850.

For some protesters, waving the Mexican flag is not so much rejecting America as reclaiming a cultural heritage that has long been present in the city. The flag also invokes the Chicano Movement of the 1960s and 70s, when leaders like César Chávez and Dolores Huerta organized protests for civil rights and workers’ protections.

I get the energy and passion of youth,” wrote Arizona Republic columnist Phil Boas, “but saner heads in the Latino community in Phoenix and Los Angeles may need to stage an intervention. Waving a Mexican flag in MAGA’s face might feel good, but you’re not seeing how much of a turn-off that is to many Americans who are not MAGA.

In response to the unrest, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum called for restraint, “We call on the Mexican community to act peacefully and not fall for provocations.”

Regardless of differences of opinion with regard to symbolism, the presence of the flag has incited a national dialogue regarding identity, immigration, and protest in contemporary America.

Trump Unveils $1,000 ‘Trump Accounts’ for Every Newborn in New GOP Economic Plan

June 10, 2025, 11:26 am

President Donald Trump recently convened a roundtable at the White House on Monday to officially roll out an important component of the Republican-sponsored domestic policy bill — namely, a $1,000 government-sponsored investment account for each American baby.

Called “Trump Accounts,” this pilot program is a centerpiece of the House-passed legislation and is intended to encourage long-term financial development for generations to come.

Who Is Eligible and How the Program Operates

Under the proposed initiative, the federal government would automatically give a $1,000 contribution to all US citizen children born between January 2025 and January 2029. In turn, the legal guardians of the child would then handle the money and invest it in index funds tied to the stock market.

Parents, guardians, or individual donors can contribute a maximum of $5,000 each year into the account over the life of a child. The program aims to create a stable financial base by the time recipients become adults.

A Push for Economic Mobility and Ownership

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt spoke to the redistributive power of the plan, stating, “Passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill will transform the lives of working, middle-class families all across America by bringing them the biggest tax cuts in history, raising the child tax credit, AND by putting the lives of young Americans on the right financial track with this fantastic new ‘Trump Account’ program.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson also pointed to the wider economic benefit, saying it would result in higher take-home pay for workers and less red tape for small businesses.

Corporate Endorsement of the Trump Accounts

The news, further boosting its momentum, received strong corporate endorsement. Notably, executives from Dell, Uber, Salesforce, ARM Corp, Robinhood, and Goldman Sachs were present at the roundtable in the State Dining Room. During the event, they enthusiastically committed multi-billion-dollar investments into Trump Accounts for the children of their employees.

Michael Dell, Dell Technologies CEO, expressed his company’s dedication, “Dell Technologies will gladly match dollar for dollar the government’s seed investment in these accounts for all the children born to Dell employees. This bold step toward an ownership society. Will have deep and far-reaching effects on the nation.”

As the Fourth of July approaches, the Trump administration is increasingly intensifying pressure on the Senate to swiftly approve this landmark domestic policy legislation.

Tear Gas, Fires, and Clashes: Los Angeles Protest Turns Violent After National Guard Deployed

June 9, 2025, 11:57 am

Los Angeles plunged into chaos on Sunday after President Donald Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops without California Governor Gavin Newsom’s consent. The move, aimed at suppressing protests over recent federal immigration raids, ignited violent confrontations, street blockades, and political outcry across the city.

Federal Show of Force Sparks Uprising in Los Angeles

Protesters flooded downtown Los Angeles, particularly around federal buildings and the 101 Freeway, clashing with law enforcement and National Guard units. Trump urged immediate action against demonstrators, saying authorities should not let them “get away with this.” Former LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell, noting the growing unrest, reportedly considered reassessing the situation, prompting Trump to respond, “He should do it right now.”

This is the current situation in Los Angeles, United States. US seems to be preparing to deploy Marines after the National Guard was deployed and yet failed to control the violence and rioting. Situation is going out of hand. US is the new Third world. pic.twitter.com/iyZjr8BeOV

— Aditya Raj Kaul (@AdityaRajKaul) June 9, 2025

The President’s move, reminiscent of the Civil Rights era, triggered a legal and constitutional firestorm, as the National Guard mobilized without gubernatorial approval.

Federal Buildings and Freeways Under Siege in Los Angeles

The downtown federal detention center became a flashpoint. Protesters hurled objects as troops equipped with riot shields and long guns responded with tear gas and smoke canisters. Protesters blocked the 101 Freeway, throwing debris and fireworks, forcing officers to take cover under overpasses as chaos erupted overhead.

At least four self-driving Waymo cars were set on fire, with explosions lighting the night sky and sending thick black smoke billowing through the city. The attacks symbolized tech-focused rage among demonstrators, who accused the federal government of invasive surveillance and suppression.

Newsom Slams Trump’s Move as “Inflammatory”

Governor Gavin Newsom condemned the deployment, stating, “It’s a serious breach of state sovereignty.” He accused the President of triggering unrest with “purposefully inflammatory” actions and demanded the immediate withdrawal of federal troops in California—a rare direct challenge to presidential authority.

As night fell, LAPD declared multiple unlawful assemblies, but many protesters refused to disperse. Behind makeshift barricades, they resisted, throwing objects at officers and continuing to defy curfews.

Trump Reinforces Law-and-Order Agenda

Doubling down, President Trump told reporters, “There were violent people… and they’re not gonna get away with it.” He hinted at broader military involvement, adding, “We’re gonna have troops everywhere.”

The FBI announced a $50,000 reward for information on a protester accused of injuring a federal officer in Paramount. This marked a shift toward federal criminal investigations as unrest intensified.

Democrats Condemn “Abuse of Power”

Governor Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the deployment “an alarming abuse of power.” Several Democratic governors joined in, accusing Trump of “trying to manufacture a crisis” to push a political agenda.

1. Meanwhile, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) confirmed over 100 arrests during the week. 2. The arrests included individuals with legal status, raising further concerns about indiscriminate enforcement. Civil rights groups signaled upcoming lawsuits.

Trump Taxing Americans – Global Trade Will Re-balance to American

April 5, 2025, 2:27 am

President Donald Trump recently introduced sweeping tariffs on imported goods, establishing a baseline 10% tariff on most items, with significantly higher tariffs on imports from countries experiencing substantial trade imbalances, such as China, the European Union, Mexico, India, and Japan. While Trump and his administration argue that these tariffs will restore American manufacturing and reduce trade deficits, the reality is far more complex. By imposing these tariffs, Trump may inadvertently be taxing American consumers while pushing global trade to rebalance in a manner that ultimately disadvantages the United States.

The immediate impact of the new tariffs will be felt by American consumers, who will see higher prices on everyday goods. For example, fresh produce from Mexico, a key import, could rise in cost by 20% or more, making groceries more expensive for families across the country. Similarly, electronics imported from China, including smartphones and laptops, are expected to see price hikes due to tariffs ranging from 20% to over 40%. This added financial burden comes at a time when inflation is already squeezing American household budgets.

Nobel laureate economist Paul Krugman has criticized the strategy, emphasizing that tariffs function as a consumption tax, disproportionately affecting low and middle income households. He argues that the assumed benefits for domestic manufacturing are exaggerated, as many industries depend on global supply chains, which tariffs only disrupt.
Historical data supports the claim that tariffs are ultimately paid by consumers. During the trade war in 2018, Trump imposed tariffs on $250 billion worth of Chinese goods, and studies showed that American importers—and, consequently, consumers bore nearly the entire cost. An analysis by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) found that tariffs cost the average American household $831 annually during that period. With the newly announced tariffs, similar outcomes can be expected, if not worse.

Joseph Stiglitz, another Nobel Prize-winning economist, points out that the new tariffs could also backfire by causing supply chain disruptions that ultimately hurt American producers. For instance, tariffs on aluminium and steel in 2018 led to increased costs for U.S. manufacturers, particularly in the automotive and aerospace industries, reducing competitiveness.
Global Trade Dynamics – Unintended consequences of Trump’s strategy seems focused on pressuring foreign manufacturers to move production to the U.S. or lower their prices to stay competitive. However, this approach may backfire. International producers, particularly those in strategic sectors such as technology and automotive, are more likely to diversify their supply chains away from the U.S. to avoid long-term risks. Already, China and the EU have begun seeking alternative trade partnerships to reduce dependency on the American market.
One striking example of this shift is China’s increased outreach to India to strengthen bilateral trade relations, an effort aimed at reducing its reliance on American imports. By fostering stronger ties with other major economies, China aims to mitigate the impact of U.S. tariffs and maintain a stable trade environment.

Moreover, patriotism and national pride may lead to unintended bias against U.S. products. In Canada, for instance, grassroots campaigns encouraging the boycott of American goods have gained traction, reflecting a growing resentment toward perceived economic bullying. During upcoming elections, Trump’s Canadian position will be played up by both political parties further widening cultural and thus economic chasm. Such social movements could further erode the competitiveness of U.S. exports in key allied markets.
According to economist Dani Rodrik, forcing abrupt changes in global trade relationships can create instability that takes decades to resolve. He notes that U.S. firms already feeling the effects of supply chain disruptions may lose global market share as competitors adjust to new trade realities.

Rebalancing That Will Disadvantages America – Instead of pressuring trading partners to concede to U.S. demands, the tariffs may push them to explore more robust intra-regional trade agreements. For instance, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has already expanded to include the United Kingdom, making it more appealing as an alternative to U.S.-centric trade. Similarly, the EU and China have been deepening economic ties, potentially marginalizing the U.S. from future trade benefits.
Limited Gains for Domestic Manufacturing: The notion that tariffs will bring manufacturing jobs back to the U.S. is appealing but often exaggerated. Manufacturing has been declining as a share of GDP for decades due to automation and the global shift toward services. Even if some jobs return, they may be in highly automated plants, requiring fewer workers and offering less economic stimulus than anticipated. Additionally, companies facing higher input costs may reduce hiring or shift production to non-tariffed countries, further diluting the supposed benefits.
Tariffs rarely lead to long-term gains in manufacturing employment. Instead, they tend to raise costs for producers reliant on imported components, reducing profitability and limiting job growth.

Political and Social Implications: Politically, the tariffs might appeal to Trump’s core base, who cheer them as a bold step to defend American interests. However, as prices rise, even the current supporters may begin to question whether the economic sacrifice is worth the perceived long-term gains. Small businesses that rely on imported goods could be hit hardest, leading to closures or layoffs that disproportionately affect lower-income communities.
The affected countries primarily have middle-class-driven economies, which will quickly shift their preference towards non-US goods. This shift will further impact the US manufacturing sector.
The bottom line is…Trump’s tariff policy risks backfiring by increasing costs for consumers, prompting global trade realignments unfavourable to the U.S., and failing to deliver the promised resurgence of American manufacturing. While the intention to level the playing field is clear, the method may ultimately leave Americans bearing the brunt of the cost while international competitors adapt and thrive. More nuanced and cooperative trade policies are essential to strengthen the U.S. economy.

A New Challenge for India-US Relations

March 31, 2025, 2:20 am

Earlier this month, President Donald Trump of the United States of America accused India, the European Union, Mexico, Brazil, and other countries of having trade practices that are unfair to the United States. He also specified that “reciprocal tariffs” will be enforced beginning on April 2. In his statement, Trump emphasised that this action will produce considerable cash for the United States of America and create employment. He also stated that the country has been taken advantage of for decades, but that it will no longer allow this behaviour. Emphasising the inequity of the system, Trump stated, “This system is not fair to the United States and never was hence we will impose tariffs on other countries in response to the tariffs they impose on us”.

WHAT IS TARIFF?
Tariffs apply to foreign imports. Companies that import commodities pay taxes to the government. Tariffs are usually a proportion of product value. For example, a $10 foreign product costs $3 more due to a 30% tax. Companies may pass on tariff costs to customers. US products tariffs are usually lower than others. The extra taxes and tariffs on international imports Trump has hinted may begin on April 2 might raise costs for US and global consumers, economists say.

INDIA’S STANCE SO FAR
Indian officials are examining strategies to reduce tariffs on various imports, such as cars and chemicals, as a response to US President Donald Trump’s proposed reciprocal tariffs, according to sources familiar with the situation, as reported by Bloomberg. Officials in New Delhi are engaged in discussions regarding the potential reduction of duties on automobiles, select agricultural products, chemicals, essential pharmaceuticals, and specific medical devices and electronics. Sources indicate that these individuals prefer to remain anonymous as the plans have not yet been finalised. With weeks until Trump’s retaliatory tariffs, trade minister Piyush Goyal went to the US a few days ago to negotiate trade. Last month, Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited the U.S. and promised to start a trade pact by autumn 2025, aiming for $500 billion in bilateral commerce by 2030.
India is willing to drop tariffs on industrial exports like cars and chemicals but not on agricultural products, which would hurt millions of impoverished farmers. India has dropped duties on high-end motorbikes from 50% to 30% and 100% on bourbon whisky from 150% to reduce trade tensions, while vowing to examine other tariffs, increase energy imports, and buy more defence equipment.

INDIA- US: POLITICAL RELATIONS SO FAR
The relationship between India and the US is characterised by complexity. Prime Minister A.B. Vajpayee characterised the two nations as “natural allies,” indicating a significant alignment of values and geopolitical interests. President Barack Obama characterised the relationship between India and the United States as “a defining partnership of the 21st century.” President Joe Biden modified it by adding the definite article “the”. In his 2016 address to the joint session of the US Congress, Modi stated that the “relationship has overcome the hesitations of history,” indicating a shift towards a more open and committed partnership between the two nations. Despite their differences on various issues, the similarities between the two nations significantly surpass the areas of disagreement. India and the US maintained a stable relationship during the first Trump presidency. The notable parallels in approach and messaging between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump, particularly their emphasis on the theme of national greatness, played a significant role in fostering their personal rapport.

IMPACT OF RECIPROCAL TARIFFS
Since Trump took office, taxes on Chinese imports have raised medication raw material prices by 20%. Pharmaceutics are India’s largest export, and generics are important in the US. Any reciprocal levies by the US would raise generic and speciality drug prices, hurting millions of Americans. A major concern has arisen about the healthcare sector of the US. The United States is significantly dependent on Indian generic pharmaceuticals, with around fifty percent of all generic medications utilised in the US sourced from India. This has led to substantial savings for the US healthcare system, with estimates indicating that Indian generics saved the US $219 billion in 2022, according to research by consulting company IQVIA.

WHAT WILL THE RECIPROCAL TARIFF MEAN FOR INDIA
Experts think India might export more technology, electronics, and jewellery to America due to Trump’s 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada and China’s 10% tariff. The US and India seek to increase their economic dominance in the Indo-Pacific and challenge China. The time and incentives are right for these two leaders to make a major deal.
India is rushing to finish its Bilateral Trade Agreement with the US, balancing its concerns with Washington’s expectations. The government is creating a list of commodities where India will decrease tariffs to avoid retaliatory tariffs.
Trump said India pledged tariff cuts a few days ago. US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said the US wants to negotiate a broad-based trade pact and discuss products individually because it may take years to finalise. India had hoped for an exception, but Trump has frequently emphasised that India’s high tariff system will not be favoured.
In conclusion, both the United States and India must acknowledge the strategic and economic significance they provide one another and strive for a balanced trading partnership. As two of the world’s major democracies with expanding economic relations, it is imperative that they participate in transparent and productive discourse to resolve issues like tariffs and trade policy. Instead of permitting protectionist policies to generate discord, both countries should seek avenues to augment collaboration, diminish trade obstacles, and cultivate a relationship advantageous to enterprises and consumers alike. A cooperative strategy will enhance economic connections and fortify the expanding geopolitical partnership between the two states.

How President Donald Trump Is Overhauling the US Administration | TDG Explainer

March 23, 2025, 3:13 pm

President Donald Trump is making drastic changes to the U.S. administration. His policies focus on reducing federal control, restructuring government agencies, and strengthening executive power. Supporters see this as necessary reform. Critics warn of risks to democracy. Here’s how his administration is reshaping the system.

Dismantling the Department of Education

On March 20, 2025, Trump signed an executive order to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education. He wants state and local governments to take full control of education. His goal is to reduce federal involvement and increase parental choice.

His supporters argue that this will give communities more power over school policies. However, critics say it may harm students who rely on federal protections, especially those in marginalized groups. Schools currently receive about 10% of their budgets from federal funding. Without this support, some districts could struggle to maintain programs.

Shifting Foreign Aid to Focus on U.S. Interests

Donald Trump is overhauling how the U.S. distributes foreign aid. His administration plans to cut funding for programs that do not align with American geopolitical goals. According to an internal memo, the government will prioritize aid that strengthens national security and economic interests.

This change marks a major shift from past policies. Previous administrations focused on humanitarian aid and global stability. Supporters argue that taxpayer dollars should directly benefit American interests. Critics fear that reduced funding for humanitarian programs could harm vulnerable nations and weaken U.S. global influence.

Expanding Executive Power

Trump is pushing to expand presidential authority. His administration is replacing career civil servants with political appointees. He also wants independent agencies to report directly to the White House.

This approach follows the unitary executive theory, which argues that the President has full control over the executive branch. Trump claims this will make the government more efficient and responsive. However, legal experts warn that it could erode checks and balances. If implemented fully, this shift could weaken congressional oversight and judicial independence.

Reshaping the Federal Judiciary

Trump is appointing conservative judges to federal courts. His administration has compiled a list of nominees who align with his policies. Judges Aileen Cannon and Kathryn Kimball Mizelle are among the candidates.

By placing conservative judges in key positions, Trump aims to secure a long-term legal legacy. His supporters believe this will uphold traditional values. Critics argue that it could make courts less likely to protect civil rights and progressive policies.

During his first term, Trump appointed three Supreme Court justices and over 200 federal judges, reshaping the judiciary for decades. His current strategy continues this trend, ensuring conservative influence remains strong in U.S. law.

Cutting Federal Jobs and Reducing Bureaucracy

Trump has ordered a reduction in the federal workforce. His executive order limits hiring to essential positions and enforces stricter job performance standards. The Office of Personnel Management is overseeing these changes.

Trump argues that a smaller government will improve efficiency and save taxpayer money. He believes a large federal workforce slows down decision-making. His administration plans to shift many responsibilities to state governments.

Opponents say these cuts could weaken essential services. Fewer government employees could lead to delays in processing benefits, maintaining infrastructure, and responding to crises.

A Fight Against Progressive Ideology

Trump has positioned himself as a defender of traditional values. He has criticized progressive policies in education, military policies, and government hiring. He argues that these policies promote a “woke ideology” that threatens American culture.

In 2024, Trump linked his political fight to his daughter Vivian Jenna Wilson’s transition. He stated, “I lost my son, essentially… killed by the woke mind virus.” He added, “I vowed to destroy the woke mind virus after that, and we’re making some progress.”

His administration has already reversed diversity training programs in government agencies. He has also pushed for curriculum changes in schools, favoring “patriotic education” over topics like systemic racism and gender identity.

Trump’s policies aim to reduce federal power, increase executive control, and promote conservative values. His supporters see this as a bold move to reform the system and cut government waste. His critics argue that these changes threaten democracy, weaken institutions, and consolidate power in ways that could have lasting effects.

As his administration continues its overhaul, the impact of these policies will shape the future of the U.S. government for years to come.

Trump’s Tariff Policy: A New Challenge for India-U.S. Relations

March 19, 2025, 2:50 am

WHAT WILL THE RECIPROCAL TARIFF MEAN FOR INDIA
Experts think India might export more technology, electronics, and jewellery to America due to Trump’s 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada and China’s 10% tariff. The US and India seek to increase their economic dominance in the Indo-Pacific and challenge China. The time and incentives are right for these two leaders to make a major deal.
India is rushing to finish its Bilateral Trade Agreement with the US, balancing its concerns with Washington’s expectations. The government is creating a list of commodities where India will decrease tariffs to avoid retaliatory tariffs. Trump said India pledged tariff cuts a few days ago. US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said the US wants to negotiate a broad-based trade pact and discuss products individually because it may take years to finalise. India had hoped for an exception, but Trump has frequently emphasised that India’s high tariff system will not be favoured.
In conclusion, both the United States and India must acknowledge the strategic and economic significance they provide one another and strive for a balanced trading partnership. As two of the world’s major democracies with expanding economic relations, it is imperative that they participate in transparent and productive discourse to resolve issues like tariffs and trade policy.
Instead of permitting protectionist policies to generate discord, both countries should seek avenues to augment collaboration, diminish trade obstacles, and cultivate a relationship advantageous to enterprises and consumers alike.
A cooperative strategy will enhance economic connections and fortify the expanding geopolitical partnership between the two states.

Significant meeting between PM Modi and President Trump

February 13, 2025, 1:39 am

One of the signals of the importance being accorded by the US to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the United States to meet the newly elected President Donald Trump is the fact that he will be staying at the Blair House, which is also known as the President’s Guest House. Located just across the White House, this 1824-built Blair House has hosted world leaders such as Charles de Gaulle, Queen Elizabeth II, Emperor of Japan, Boris Yeltsin and Tony Blair among others. So if symbolism is anything to go by, the Prime Minister of India is being given the respect the leader of the world’s most populous democracy, and the most consequential partner of the US in the 21st century, deserves.

The conversation should start from this point and not from the bucket loads of tariff that Trump is supposed to be imposing on India, if the detractors of India-US relations are to be believed. President Trump may have spoken of 100% tariffs on BRICS countries if they go for a BRICS currency, or may have made off the cuff remarks on reciprocal tariffs, but the fact is that these are edges—particularly the reciprocal tariffs bit—that can be smoothened, with a bit of give and take and some intelligent handling. President Trump’s grouse against a BRICS currency is anyway a non-issue, for there is no BRICS currency on the horizon. In fact, India in particular is completely against a BRICS currency as that would mean allowing the BRICS to slide into China’s sphere of influence completely. So whatever the economists at Morgan Stanley and Nomura Holdings might be saying, that India will be one of the two biggest victims of tariffs by Trump—the other one is Thailand—the fact is that the 47th President of the United States needs to be given some sweeteners in the shape of deals and investments by Indian companies that can help him to take his “America First” policy forward—and why not? That is the platform on which he has come to power—Make America Great Again. At the same time, India too has an “India First” policy and it is here that the meeting point has to be found between the two countries, without compromising each other’s interests. Take the example of defence. President Trump wants India to buy more American defence materiel. But for that he has to ensure that first, all sorts of critical technology are shared with India and after that there is no delay in delivery. India has another ask, technology sharing so that the US and India can jointly manufacture some of these defence materiel in India. Earlier there was talk of the possibility of the F-16 being manufactured in India and to be sold across the world. This would have also ensured the induction of multiple F-16s in India’s Air Force. It is hoped that the proposal will be picked up again in Trump 2.0.

President Trump also may want India to buy oil from the US, and reduce its dependency on Russia. But for that the US will have to ensure comparable prices, because on this issue it is India’s interest that will matter first.
If President Trump is looking at investments from India—which many Indian companies are already doing—it’s a two-way street. India too expects investments from American companies.

Seen from a broader perspective, the US cannot have an Indo-Pacific policy without India being at the centre of it—not just as a security provider for the broader region, but also as the voice of the Global South, bringing to the table the issues of the poorer countries of the region, be they in the Pacific or in the Indian Ocean Region, and thus acting as a bridge builder. In terms of defence and security, India and the US have come a long way and Prime Minister Modi’s meeting with President Trump is expected to give a boost in that direction, expanding cooperation. After all, but for India, who is standing up to China not only in Asia, but in the whole world? So if there has to be a free and open Indo-Pacific, there is no option but for deeper cooperation between India and the US. As we have seen even during Trump 1.0, India-US relations were on a growth trajectory. There is no reason why that will not be repeated and taken further during Trump 2.0 as well.

Hence, this latest meeting between the two leaders are very important and is expected to open new doors of cooperation. All eyes are now on the 13 February meeting in Washington, DC, to see what the two leaders unveil for the two countries they respectively head.

Trump Signs Laken Riley Act, Securing First Legislative Victory of Second Term

January 30, 2025, 2:33 am

President Trump on Wednesday signed the Laken Riley Act into law, marking his first legislative victory since returning to the White House after campaigning on immigration and border security during his 2024 run.

The bill passed the House last week in a 263-156 vote, with 46 Democrats supporting it after the Senate approved the measure in a bipartisan 64-35 vote.

“This is a very important law, this is something that has brought Democrats and Republicans together. That’s not something that’s easy to do — Laken did it. Laken did it. America will never, ever forget Laken Hope Riley,” Trump said at the bill signing, calling it “a landmark law” that can “save countless innocent American lives.”

The bill mandates the detention of a broad range of migrants without legal status, including those permitted to enter the U.S. to seek asylum, if they have been accused of theft, burglary, or shoplifting.

Some Democrats were in attendance at the White House for the bill signing, including Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), who co-sponsored the legislation in the Senate.

Trump thanked the Republicans for voting for the bill, as well as the Democrats who voted across party lines, warning that those who didn’t vote for it “are going to be sorry.”

The president made targeting migrants who have committed crimes a central issue in his campaign, resonating with voters who supported a crackdown on immigration.

The law is named after Georgia nursing student Laken Riley, who was killed by a Venezuelan migrant arrested for shoplifting prior to the attack after being paroled into the country.

Riley’s parents and sister were present at the event, and her mother spoke before the bill signing, calling Trump “a man of his word.”

“Laken was a brilliant and beautiful 22-year-old nursing student from Georgia,” Trump said. “She was respected by everybody, even her teachers.”

He noted that Riley’s family “had a miserable period of time” after her murder during a jog on the University of Georgia campus. Trump added that the Venezuelan migrant who killed her was “set loose into our country by the last administration” after being arrested three times in the U.S.

Trump also highlighted recent deportations during his tenure, stating, “we’re getting them the hell out of here.”

“As president, I’m fighting every single day to ensure that such a tragedy never happens again. We don’t want this to happen,” he said.

The law also grants state governments the ability to sue the federal government for immediate relief to prevent a future administration from refusing to enforce immigration laws, something Trump argued occurred “for four long years” under former President Biden.

Cabinet members, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, were in the audience, along with the families of other Americans killed by individuals who recently entered the U.S.

“Many of the angel families here today were betrayed by the last administration and with its heartless and foolish and really very, very arrogant and very, very dumb policies, policies that aren’t really believable when you talk about common sense,” Trump said.

At the signing, Trump also announced he would sign an executive order to prepare Guantánamo Bay to “detain the worst criminal illegal aliens threatening the American people.”

Critics took issue with a provision in the law requiring detention after someone is charged with a crime rather than after a conviction. The bill was first cleared by House GOP lawmakers in March, just weeks after Riley’s death, but the Senate, then controlled by Democrats, did not act on it until this year. The Republican-controlled Senate passed a version of the bill that included amendments to detain migrants charged with crimes causing death or serious bodily injury and assaulting a law enforcement officer.

Trump frequently referenced Riley’s case during his campaign, with her death becoming a flashpoint over immigration policy. When a Georgia judge in November charged Jose Ibarra, a 26-year-old Venezuelan migrant, with killing Riley, Trump called the verdict “justice.”

“The Illegal who killed our beloved Laken Riley was just found GUILTY on all counts for his horrific crimes,” the president, elected days earlier, said.

Trump kept his campaign promises to target migrants, especially those committing crimes in the U.S., through a series of executive orders on his first day back in office.

Signing the Laken Riley Act was part of Trump’s early actions on immigration. His executive orders include a pause on refugee admissions, reinstating a program pairing local law enforcement with immigration agents, and declaring a national emergency that paves the way for more active-duty military along the southern border, as well as funneling resources for the border wall.

He also signed an order labeling migration as an “invasion” and seeks to end asylum processing by designating migrants as a public health and national security threat.

Pete Hegseth’s First Day: Trump Expected to Issue Orders on Transgender Forces, COVID, and More

January 28, 2025, 2:49 am

President Donald Trump is set to sign a series of executive orders on Monday aimed at the military, including reinstating service members discharged for refusing COVID-19 vaccines, assessing the role of transgender troops, and further detailing rollbacks in diversity programs. These actions coincide with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s first day in office.

The orders are expected to build on Trump’s initial directives issued shortly after his inauguration last week. Those directives included removing protections for transgender troops established under former President Joe Biden and banning DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) initiatives at federal agencies.

During his first term, Trump attempted to ban transgender troops, but the effort was stalled in court and later overturned by Biden. The new order on transgender troops does not implement an outright ban but instructs the Pentagon to develop a policy based on military readiness, according to a source familiar with the matter who spoke to The Associated Press.

Hegseth addressed reporters as he arrived at the Pentagon, stating that his first day would involve significant activity, including additional executive orders. “On removing DEI inside the Pentagon, reinstating troops who were pushed out because of COVID mandates, Iron Dome for America — this is happening quickly,” he said. Trump had campaigned on the promise to build an Iron Dome system, modeled after Israel’s advanced air defense system.

While specifics of the new DEI order remain unclear, Trump’s initial action banning such programs across the federal government has already led to wide-ranging impacts. Agencies, uncertain of the scope of the ban, have removed content that might conflict with Trump’s policy. This included videos on the Tuskegee Airmen and World War II Women’s Airforce Service Pilots (WASPs), which had been part of DEI training for the Air Force’s basic military training.

The removal of these videos caused significant backlash. The Tuskegee Airmen, the nation’s first Black military pilots, served in a segregated unit during WWII, and their 332nd Fighter Group achieved one of the lowest bomber loss rates in the war. WASPs were essential in ferrying warplanes for the military.

On Sunday, the Air Force clarified that DEI courses were being edited and that the Tuskegee Airmen and WASP content would remain part of training. “The revised training which focuses on the documented historic legacy and decorated valor with which these units and Airmen fought for our Nation in World War II and beyond will continue on 27 January,” the Air Force said.

Hegseth also addressed the issue on X, stating that any move to remove the Tuskegee Airmen content was “immediately reversed.” However, the confusion highlights challenges as Defense Department leaders work to eliminate diversity-related content from websites and training. On Monday, Hegseth, accompanied by Gen. CQ Brown Jr., chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, avoided mentioning the issue directly but emphasized that “military training will be focused on the readiness of what our troops in the field need to deter our enemies.”

Hegseth also reiterated his focus on border security, saying, “Whatever is needed at the border will be provided,” including active duty, National Guard, and state-activated Guard troops.

Hegseth’s appointment as Defense Secretary was confirmed by the Senate on Friday night in a tie-breaking vote cast by Vice President JD Vance.

‘Blatantly Unconstitutional’: Judge Strikes Down Trump’s Citizenship Order

January 24, 2025, 1:07 am

Seattle: A federal judge in Seattle on Thursday blocked President Donald Trump’s administration from enforcing an executive order that sought to curtail automatic birthright citizenship in the United States, calling it “blatantly unconstitutional.”

U.S. District Judge John Coughenour issued a temporary restraining order at the request of four Democratic-led states, halting the implementation of the order, which Trump signed on Monday during his first day in office.

“This is a blatantly unconstitutional order,” the judge told a U.S. Justice Department lawyer defending the measure.

The executive order has already drawn five lawsuits from civil rights groups and Democratic attorneys general from 22 states, who argue that it flagrantly violates the U.S. Constitution.

“Under this order, babies being born today don’t count as U.S. citizens,” Washington Assistant Attorney General Lane Polozola said at the hearing. Representing Democratic state attorneys general from Washington, Arizona, Illinois, and Oregon, Polozola urged Judge Coughenour to block the order, which challengers argue violates the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment. The clause guarantees citizenship to anyone born in the United States.

Trump’s executive order directs federal agencies to deny citizenship to children born in the U.S. if neither parent is a citizen or lawful permanent resident.

In a brief filed Wednesday, the Justice Department described the order as an “integral part” of Trump’s broader efforts to address the nation’s “broken immigration system and the ongoing crisis at the southern border.”

The lawsuit in Seattle is moving faster than four similar cases filed against the order. Judge Coughenour, a Reagan appointee, could rule from the bench or issue a written decision before the order’s effective date.

If implemented, the order would deny citizenship to children born after February 19 whose parents are neither citizens nor lawful permanent residents. These children would also be subject to deportation and barred from obtaining Social Security numbers, government benefits, and lawful employment opportunities as they grow older.

According to the Democratic-led states, more than 150,000 newborns would lose their citizenship annually if the order is upheld.

The challengers argue that the Constitution’s citizenship clause was definitively interpreted 127 years ago when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents are entitled to citizenship. The 14th Amendment, adopted in 1868, was designed to overturn the Supreme Court’s infamous 1857 Dred Scott decision, which denied constitutional protections to enslaved Black people.

However, the Justice Department contends that the 14th Amendment does not guarantee universal birthright citizenship. It argued that the Supreme Court’s 1898 decision in United States v. Wong Kim Ark applied only to children of lawful permanent residents.

The department also claimed that the states’ case fails to meet legal requirements, asserting that only individuals—not states—can bring claims under the citizenship clause and that the states lack standing to sue.

Meanwhile, 36 Republican members of the U.S. House of Representatives introduced legislation on Tuesday to restrict automatic citizenship to children born to U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents.

‘Come make your product in America’: President Donald Trump Urges Business Leaders in First Global Address

January 24, 2025, 12:15 am

In his first global address since taking office, President Donald Trump on Thursday urged international business leaders to manufacture their products in the United States, promising “among the lowest taxes of any nation on Earth” while warning that those who do not would face tariffs.

Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Trump stated, “My message to every business in the world is very simple. Come make your product in America, and we will give you among the lowest taxes of any nation on Earth.”

He added, “We’re bringing them down very substantially, even from the original Trump tax cuts. But if you don’t make your product in America, which is your prerogative, then very simply you will have to pay a tariff.”

Trump reiterated his stance on tariffs, which he previously proposed for goods from Mexico, Canada, and China, while also considering similar measures for imports from the EU. His remarks suggested the tariffs could apply broadly, with “differing amounts” aimed at redirecting substantial revenue to the U.S. Treasury. He said, “But a tariff which will direct hundreds of billions of dollars and even trillions of dollars into our treasury to strengthen our economy and pay down debt.”

The speech marked Trump’s first address to global business and political leaders, just four days into his presidency, at a time when markets remain uncertain about his plans for imposing broad tariffs on imports.

Lower oil prices to end Russia-Ukraine war

While oil prices dropped and currencies fluctuated during his speech, President Donald Trump addressed international oil prices, directly linking them to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

“I’m also going to ask Saudi Arabia and OPEC to bring down the cost of oil, You’ve got to bring it down, which, frankly, I’m surprised they didn’t do before the election. That didn’t show a lot of love. Surprised by that,” Trump said. “If the price came down, the Russia, Ukraine war would end immediately.”

He continued, “Right now, the price is high enough that that war will continue. You got to bring down the oil price. You could end that war.”

Trump also set himself on a potential collision course with the Federal Reserve, urging it to cut interest rates “immediately” to bolster both the U.S. and global economy.

“I’ll demand that interest rates drop immediately. And likewise, they should be dropping all over the world,” Trump added in a video conference on Thursday.

Canada and EU

President Donald Trump launched sharp criticisms at traditional allies such as Canada and the European Union, accusing them of contributing to the U.S. trade goods deficit. “One thing we’re going to be demanding is respect from other nations. Canada, we have a tremendous deficit with Canada. We’re not going to have that anywhere,” he declared.

Trump outlined his strategies to reduce inflation through tariffs, deregulation, and tax cuts, while emphasizing his aim to position the U.S. as a global leader in artificial intelligence, cryptocurrencies, and fossil fuels. “The United States has the largest amount of oil and gas of any country on Earth, and we’re going to use it,” he said, vowing to cut costs and strengthen manufacturing.

He also criticized EU taxation policies, dismissed long-standing Davos priorities like climate change and diversity, and reiterated his call for NATO countries to increase defense spending to 5% of their gross domestic product.

“I wish you and your…..”: Contents of Joe Biden’s Letter to Trump Disclosed

January 23, 2025, 4:01 am

Donald Trump discovered the letter Joe Biden left for him on Inauguration Day inside the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office. With a “little help” from Fox News Senior White House correspondent Peter Doocy, the president came across the letter while signing a series of executive orders.

He read the contents of the letter aloud, which Fox News later revealed, in front of reporters on Monday.

The following day, during a press conference, Trump described the note from the former president as “inspirational-type.”

Biden’s letter to Trump

The letter addressed to “Dear President Trump” read: “As I take leave of this sacred office I wish you and your family all the best in the next four years.” Joe Biden continued, “The American people – and people around the world – look to this house for steadiness in the inevitable storms of history, and my prayer is that in the coming years will be a time of prosperity, peace, and grace for our nation,” according to Fox News.

Trump discovered the letter enclosed in a white envelope addressed to “47” after Fox News correspondent Peter Doocy asked if the outgoing president had left him a note.

“He may have. Don’t they leave it in the desk? I don’t know,” Trump told Doocy, before discovering the letter. “Thank you, Peter. It could have been years before we found this thing,” he added.

On Tuesday, Trump shared his thoughts on the note while responding to Doocy’s questions. “It was a very nice letter,” he said. “It was a little bit of an inspirational-type letter. Enjoy it, do a good job. Important, very important. How important the job is,” he continued, adding, “It was a positive, for him, in writing it. I appreciated the letter.”

China Urges Global Support for WHO After U.S. Exit

January 21, 2025, 2:07 pm

China’s foreign ministry issued a stark statement on Tuesday urging the international community to strengthen the WHO, not weaken it. It was her answer to U.S. President Donald Trump’s announcement that the United States would withdraw from the agency, thus setting into motion globe-encircling discussions about the future of international health governance.

Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun further underscored the importance of global cooperation in all efforts to address health challenges and reiterated commitment to China’s support for WHO’s critical role in global crises. China’s stance indicates that there should be still cooperation to ensure a well-coordinated global response to health issues.

“The role of the WHO should only be strengthened, not weakened,” foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said. “China will, as always, support the WHO in fulfilling its responsibilities… and work towards building a shared community of health for humanity” he added.

US Exit from WHO

The decision by the United States to pull out from the World Health Organization has indeed made it extremely imperative that some would look in future towards globalization regarding health policy issues. First proposed by US President Donald Trump, this measure alleged that the organization mismanaged and had poor preparation strategies when initially confronting the new Covid-19 situation.To argue that withdrawing will reduce global collaborative endeavors that threaten solutions for universal issues.

The United States’ exit, stripping these institutions of the much-needed funds, has initiated debates around the world regarding international institutions’ place in addressing health crises and what role nations could play to maintain public health security in the future.

Trump Signs Executive Order to Withdraw US from WHO

January 21, 2025, 12:53 pm

In a bold move, President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Monday directing the United States to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO). The decision to cut ties with the Geneva-based health body comes amid continued criticism from Trump, who has expressed dissatisfaction with the WHO’s response to the global coronavirus pandemic.

Before signing the document in the Oval Office, Trump said, “That’s a big one,” referring to the importance of the decision. Details of the order were not immediately available, but the implications of the US withdrawal are far-reaching. “They wanted us back so badly so we’ll see what happens,” Trump said in the Oval Office, referring to the WHO, perhaps hinting the US might return eventually.

WHO Faces Financial Strain Amid US Exit

The World Health Organization has historically received a good portion of its funding from the US. Contributions from the US during the 2024-25 budget cycle represented 19 percent of the revenue, amounting to $662 million. The absence of the US will leave a huge gap that may affect its ability to deliver in case of global health crises.

Restoring American sovereignty over health! https://t.co/6XRbuJk6ks

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 21, 2025

Because it will lose one of its largest financiers, the WHO will see its efforts to address humanitarian crises, as well as infectious and chronic diseases like cancer and heart disease, come to a total loss. Indeed, the WHO has been working diligently to battle worldwide health problems since the effort began to wipe out smallpox and continue its fight with HIV, polio, and now cholera and dengue fever.

Trump accused the WHO of being biased towards China in how it issued guidance during the outbreak. Under the Biden administration, the US continued to be the largest funder of the WHO and in 2023 it contributed almost one-fifth of the agency’s budget. The organization’s annual budget is $6.8 billion (£5.5 billion).

Trump’s Long-Time Criticism of the WHO

Trump’s executive order is part of a long string of dissatisfaction with the WHO, especially in terms of its management of the coronavirus. At the end of his first term, Trump tried to leave the organization after accusing it of giving in too much to the Chinese government during the initial phase of the outbreak. He criticized the WHO for not taking prompt action against the virus, and this move faced widespread criticism from health experts as well as Democrats in Congress, who took it as a political move to shift attention from the maladministration of this pandemic by his administration.

He Reversed Trump’s Withdrawal Effort

In January 2021, when President Joe Biden came into office, he undid the attempt by former President Donald Trump to withdraw from the WHO and reaffirmed the US commitment to the global health body. With Trump now in power again, his decision to withdraw may once again set the stage for a US exit from the WHO, though legal challenges may arise.

US Exit May Face Legal and Congressional Hurdles

While the constitutionality of a unilateral US withdrawal from the WHO is still undetermined, a report from the Congressional Research Service dated 2020 implies that presidential power to unilaterally withdraw from the WHO may be restricted. Nevertheless, Congress is dominated by Republicans, so they are likely to not challenge Trump’s action, and therefore, the US might soon leave the health organization.

Serious Blow to the Global Activities

Such a withdrawal would be an unmitigated blow to the WHO, as it has contributed to improving public health response to issues globally. The WHO has been instrumental in addressing the infectious diseases of HIV, polio, and cholera and health emergencies relating to the Marburg virus. The United States’ withdrawal may badly compromise the WHO’s capability to respond to these health crises.

In conclusion, this executive order on withdrawal from WHO by Trump marked a dramatic turn in US foreign policy and cast significant questions into the future of global health cooperation. With this move, when the world still faces several health threats, the US could further strain the efforts toward combatting emerging diseases and ensuring global health security.

“The 2020 election was totally rigged”: US President Donald Trump

January 21, 2025, 4:54 am

US President Donald Trump on Monday reiterated his long-standing claim that the 2020 presidential elections were “totally rigged” and alleged similar attempts were made in 2024, but this time the mandate was “too big to rig.”

Addressing supporters during the signing room ceremony in Emancipation Hall at the U.S. Capitol after his formal inauguration in the Capitol Rotunda, Trump reflected on his political journey.

“This is a journey that started in 2015, probably 20 years before that…people used to ask me, ‘you gonna run for president’. I always said ‘no no no’. One day I said, ‘Let’s give it a shot’,” Trump said.

He emphasized that resolving border issues has been a priority for him since his first campaign. “In 2015-16, I talked about the border. And now I talked about the border, but this border is much worse…we fixed the border, it was totally fixed…in 2020…The 2020 election was totally rigged but that’s okay…The only thing good about it was how bad they were. How incompetent they are. Historically this is a much bigger event,” he added.

Reflecting on his electoral performance, Trump said, “We did much better in second time in 2020. We got millions more votes…no president has ever got that many more votes I got 9 million more than anybody ever got,…and they said we lost…because of that I said to Melania ‘What do you think’, she said ‘you wanna do this again’. Had I thought we lost, I wouldn’t do it again…but I know how well we did…and this time we made it too big to rig…they tried they tried.”

Donald Trump was sworn in as the 47th President of the United States at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., with Chief Justice John Roberts administering the oath. Before Trump’s inauguration, J.D. Vance was sworn in as the 50th U.S. Vice President.

After taking the oath, Trump declared that the “golden age” of America had begun, proclaiming the day as “Liberation Day” for the country.

Commenting on the January 6 Capitol riots, Trump stated that significant measures would be taken for those he referred to as the “J6 hostages.”

“I was going to talk about the J6 hostages but you’ll be happy to know that it is the action and not the words that count and you will see a lot of action on them…They destroyed and deleted all of the information and all hearings, practically not a thing left, on Nancy Pelosi turning down the offer of 10000 soldiers…” he said.

Vice President J.D. Vance also addressed the gathering, thanking supporters and reaffirming the campaign slogan, “Make America Great Again.”

“I just want to say from the bottom of my heart, thank you for making this possible. We love you and it would not have been possible without you. We are going to make America great again for the next four years,” Vance said.

Gunshots Fired at Kamala Harris’ Campaign Office in Arizona

September 25, 2024, 3:01 pm

Multiple gunshots were fired at a Democratic campaign office for Vice President Kamala Harris in Tempe, Arizona, according to the police. The gunfire occurred sometime after midnight on Monday, damaging the office located near Southern Avenue and Priest Drive. Fortunately, no one was inside the building during the attack, but the incident has raised concerns about the safety of staff members and the surrounding community.

Public Information Officer Ryan Cook confirmed, “No one was inside the office during the overnight hours, but this raises concerns about the safety of those who work in that building, as well as those nearby.”

Ongoing Investigation

The Tempe Police Department is treating the case as a possible property crime. Footage from local news showed bullet holes in the office’s windows and doors. Investigators are currently reviewing evidence collected from the scene, and security measures have been tightened to protect staff members. Shockingly, this is the second attack on the office within two weeks.

Earlier, on September 16, the office’s front windows were damaged by what appeared to be a BB or pellet gun. No arrests have been made in connection to either incident, and authorities are exploring all possible leads.

Response from Party Officials

Arizona Democratic Party Coordinated Campaign Manager Sean McEnerney expressed gratitude to local law enforcement, stating, “We are grateful to Tempe Police for coming quickly to the scene and are fortunate no one was present or injured.”

Kamala Harris’ Upcoming Visit

The shootings come just days before Vice President Kamala Harris is set to visit Arizona, a critical battleground state in the upcoming November 5 presidential election. Reports indicate Harris will campaign across the state and visit the US-Mexico border to counter Republican candidate Donald Trump’s stance on immigration.

Attempted Attack on Donald Trump

In an unrelated incident, a second assassination attempt was recently made on former President Donald Trump at his West Palm Beach golf course on September 15. The gunman, Ryan Routh, was discovered by a Secret Service agent before he could fire a shot. Routh fled the scene but was arrested within 40 minutes.

Kamala Harris Claims Goldman Sachs Backs Her Economic Plan Over Trump’s

September 14, 2024, 1:57 am

Kamala Harris, during a rally in North Carolina, claimed that Goldman Sachs supports her economic plan over former President Donald Trump’s. Speaking in both Charlotte and Greensboro, the Vice President argued that her plan would grow the economy, while Trump’s could lead to inflation and a potential recession.

Harris’ Remarks on Economic Plans

At the rally, Harris said, “Goldman Sachs has stated that my plan would grow the economy, while Donald Trump’s plan would shrink it… His plan could reignite inflation and send us into a recession by the middle of next year.”

She emphasized the significance of choosing the right economic strategy, especially with the challenges America faces. Harris further advocated for another presidential debate, citing the high stakes of the election.

Goldman’s CEO Downplays the Report

However, Goldman Sachs CEO **David Solomon** downplayed Harris’ claims. Appearing on CNBC, Solomon clarified that the report was from an independent analyst, not Goldman Sachs itself. He explained that the differences between the two plans in terms of GDP growth were minimal, around “two-tenths of 1%.”

Solomon said, “A lot more has been made of this report than should be… We don’t even know if these policies will be implemented, and the growth impact is very slight.”

Harris Calls for Further Debates

Harris also mentioned the need for another presidential debate, emphasizing, “I believe we owe it to voters to have more debates, considering what is at stake in this election.”

Vinod Khosla, Climate Experts Slam Elon Musk’s ‘Dumb’ CO2 Lesson To Trump

August 14, 2024, 6:33 pm

Elon Musk and former President Donald Trump have faced sharp criticism from Vinod Khosla for their recent conversation on climate change, which has been widely condemned as uninformed and misleading. The discussion took place during a much-publicized interview on X (formerly Twitter), where Musk attempted to educate Trump on the dangers of greenhouse gas emissions and the benefits of renewable energy. Musk highlighted two key reasons for embracing renewable energy: the depletion of petroleum supplies and the health risks associated with carbon dioxide (CO2) buildup.

Musk, acting as a tutor to Trump, explained that CO2 levels beyond 1,000 parts per million (ppm) could cause headaches and nausea, emphasizing that even without the threat of global warming, high CO2 levels would make the environment uncomfortable. Trump, however, downplayed climate change, suggesting that rising sea levels would simply create more opportunities for real estate. He argued that the real threat to the world is not global warming but “nuclear warming,” referencing the growing number of countries with significant nuclear capabilities.

This is just completely insane:

Elon Musk goes into an incredibly detailed breakdown of CO2, clean energy and climate change that I think is very moderate and fair, and Trump responds quickly turning the conversation on its head to make it about the dangers of nuclear bombs.… pic.twitter.com/W9HggbOxpb

— Brian Krassenstein (@krassenstein) August 13, 2024

The conversation has been widely criticized, particularly for Musk’s lack of response to Trump’s dismissive comments. Indian-American businessman and venture capitalist Vinod Khosla and veteran climate activist Bill McKibben were among those who condemned the discussion. Khosla took to X to call out Musk’s CO2-level tutorial as “dumb,” arguing that the focus on 1,000 ppm is misguided. He pointed out that at 500 ppm, the likelihood of catastrophic climate impacts increases significantly, and we are currently at 420 ppm. Khosla also criticized Musk for downplaying the reality of climate change and for not holding oil and gas companies accountable for their role in exacerbating the crisis.

McKibben echoed these sentiments, labeling the conversation as “the dumbest climate conversation of all time” and expressing disappointment in Musk’s apparent shift towards climate change denial. He lamented that Musk, once a strong advocate for combating climate change, has now become a denier of scientific consensus. The backlash against Musk and Trump’s conversation highlights the ongoing struggle to address the climate crisis effectively and the dangers of spreading misinformation on such a critical issue.

Trump Rally Shooting Victim David Dutch Issues First Statement Over Assassination Attempt

August 8, 2024, 4:20 pm

David Dutch, one of the supporters injured in the recent assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, has issued a statement for the first time since being discharged from the hospital. Dutch, a 57-year-old Marine, was struck by gunfire during Trump’s campaign rally in Philadelphia, sustaining wounds to his chest and liver. Initially placed in a medically-induced coma, Dutch has since begun his recovery and expressed his deep gratitude for the support he has received.

In a statement released through his lawyer, Dutch thanked the public for their well-wishes and acknowledged the efforts of the medical team at Allegheny General Hospital, as well as the police and life flight crew who played crucial roles in his care. He and his wife, Sheree, also extended their condolences to the family of Corey Comperatore, who tragically lost his life while protecting his loved ones during the attack. The Dutch family also offered prayers for James Copenhaver, another supporter who was wounded and is currently recovering in a rehabilitation facility.

David Dutch praised Donald Trump for his unwavering commitment to his mission despite the attack. Dutch and Copenhaver, both severely injured in the incident, have engaged legal representation to ensure their interests are protected as they navigate this difficult period.

The attack, carried out by 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, resulted in the death of 50-year-old Corey Comperatore, a volunteer firefighter. The FBI continues to investigate Crooks’ motives behind the shooting.

Jennifer Aniston Doused in Oil During Dramatic Scene for The Morning Show

July 30, 2024, 8:47 am

Hollywood star Jennifer Aniston had an unusual filming experience for her acclaimed series The Morning Show in Manhattan on Sunday, as reported by the New York Post. Aniston, 55, was seen covered in a sticky, tar-like substance, looking visibly upset as her white shirt and slacks were ruined.

The Friends star appeared to be shooting a scene where her character, Alex Levy, is targeted by protesters who throw oil at her.

This peculiar scene comes as The Morning Show recently received multiple Emmy nominations, including Outstanding Drama Series and Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series for both Aniston and her co-star, Reese Witherspoon, 48.

The Morning Show explores the behind-the-scenes dynamics of a fictional morning news program, following the rivalry between anchors Alex and Bradley (Witherspoon). The series often addresses current issues such as the pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

Aniston expressed her gratitude for the show’s success on social media, writing, “Happy Sweet 16 indeed! I’m so honored and so proud of our show and all of our wildly talented actors, directors and crew! #grateful,” celebrating the 16 Emmy nominations the show received.

In a separate incident, Aniston criticized Republican Vice Presidential candidate JD Vance for his past comments about Vice President Kamala Harris. Vance’s remarks from a 2021 interview, where he referred to Harris and others as “people without children,” recently resurfaced. According to Deadline, Vance claimed the US was being run by “a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable with their own lives and choices, and so they want to make the rest of the country miserable too.”

Aniston responded strongly on Instagram, writing, “All I can say is… Mr. Vance, I pray that your daughter is fortunate enough to bear children of her own one day.”

This reaction came after former President Donald Trump announced Vance as his running mate during the Republican National Convention. Last week, President Joe Biden withdrew from the presidential race and nominated Kamala Harris as the Democratic candidate for the upcoming election.

Son’s Funny Faces Steal Spotlight During Lawmaker’s House Speech

June 6, 2024, 11:22 am

On Monday, Republican Representative John Rose’s speech in the US House of Representatives took an unexpected turn when his young son, seated behind him, captured the cameras with a series of smiles and playful expressions.

Rep. Rose was delivering a serious address denouncing former President Donald Trump’s guilty conviction in the hush-money criminal trial. However, it was his son Guy’s antics that stole the show, providing a lighthearted moment amid the political discourse.

Later, Rep. Rose took to X, formerly known as Twitter, to address the incident humorously. “This is what I get for telling my son Guy to smile at the camera for his little brother,” he wrote, sharing the moment with his followers.

The unexpected comic relief was widely shared on social media, bringing a moment of levity to the otherwise serious proceedings.

Trump Joins TikTok After Past Push For Ban

June 3, 2024, 6:51 pm

In a surprising turn of events, former President Donald Trump has made his debut on TikTok, the popular short video social media platform owned by China-based tech company ByteDance. This move comes despite Trump’s previous attempts to ban the app during his presidency.

According to a report by Politico, Trump Joins TikTok and posted a launch video on his TikTok account on Saturday night, featuring footage of him greeting fans at an Ultimate Fighting Championship fight in Newark, New Jersey. His account, under the username @realdonaldtrump, quickly amassed over 450,000 followers by 0800 GMT.

Trump joins TikTok comes amidst ongoing legal battles between ByteDance and the US government. ByteDance is currently challenging a US law that mandates the company to sell TikTok by next January or face a potential ban. The White House has expressed concerns over Chinese-based ownership of TikTok, citing national security reasons.

However, TikTok has vehemently denied allegations of data sharing with the Chinese government and has emphasized its commitment to user privacy. The platform has implemented extensive measures to safeguard user data, seeking to allay concerns raised by US authorities.

Trump’s previous efforts to ban TikTok in 2020 faced opposition from the courts, and his administration’s actions were ultimately blocked. Despite labeling TikTok as a national security threat earlier this year, Trump acknowledged the potential negative impact of a ban, particularly on young users. He also criticized Meta Platforms’ Facebook, suggesting that a TikTok ban would only serve to strengthen its competitor.

As Trump’s presence on TikTok gains attention, it underscores the complex relationship between social media, politics, and national security concerns, particularly in the lead-up to the US elections in November.