Latest Parliament News | Top Parliament News Headlines Today | Today India news | Breaking Parliament News Today | English Parliament News Headlines - TheDailyGuardian

Reshuffle likely in BJP, government post monsoon session

June 29, 2025, 4:31 am

NEW DELHI: Prime Minister Narendra Modi is likely to make major changes to his Cabinet after the Monsoon Session of Parliament. According to sources, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is set to get a new national president during the Monsoon Session, along with the announcement of a revamped party team.
The process of electing a new president has already begun, and observers are being appointed across various states to oversee the selection of state party presidents. In the BJP’s new team, some Union Ministers may be moved to organisational roles, while some from the organisation could be inducted into the government. Sources indicate that significant changes are expected, with several ministers likely to be dropped.
Modi and his team are currently reviewing the performance of ministers. It is reported that ministers who have shown low activity, particularly those with a weak presence on social media or limited public outreach, are likely to be removed. As a result, many Union Ministers and Members of Parliament have recently increased their public engagement and social media activity.
When Modi formed his Cabinet for the third term, he retained most ministers from his second term and did not make major reshuffles in key ministries. Coalition partners were accommodated, but broader organisational elections within the party were postponed due to ongoing state elections and subsequent national security concerns, such as the Pahalgam terror attack. The attack led to Operation Sindoor against Pakistan-based terrorists, delaying the BJP’s internal elections once again.
Now, with the national situation stabilising, the party is aiming to declare the new president in July and finalise the new team by the second week of August. The Monsoon Session is scheduled from July 21 to August 12. After this, Modi is expected to deliver his traditional Independence Day address from the Red Fort on August 15. Speculation is strong that a Cabinet reshuffle may follow soon after.
This reshuffle is being seen as significant ahead of the upcoming Bihar Assembly elections in October. It will also serve as a preparatory step for key state elections early next year in Kerala, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu, and Assam.
The BJP is closely monitoring political developments in Kerala, where Congress MP Shashi Tharoor appears increasingly isolated within his party. His next political move is being watched closely. In Tamil Nadu, the BJP is attempting to win over former AIADMK allies, while in West Bengal, the party is intensifying its efforts to strengthen its base.
There are strong indications that new Cabinet faces may be brought in from these states. Ahead of this expected reshuffle, the BJP has initiated the process to complete its organisational elections.
Observers have already been appointed: Harsh Malhotra for Uttarakhand, Kiren Rijiju for Maharashtra, and Ravi Shankar Prasad for West Bengal. Presidential elections will also be held in a dozen states, including Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh.
According to party sources, all state presidents are expected to be announced by July 15. A crucial meeting of RSS campaigners is scheduled to be held in Delhi from July 4 to 6, where top leaders, including RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, will be present. It is expected that discussions held during this meeting will help finalise the name of the new BJP national president.
Following the end of J.P. Nadda’s extended term, the BJP will have a new national president for the first time in over a year and a half. Once the new party leadership is in place, the focus will shift to reorganising the Union Cabinet.

Waqf Law Passed: What Changes Now For Millions Of Properties Across India?

April 5, 2025, 7:22 am

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill has cleared both Houses of Parliament after extensive debates in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha this week. Once President Droupadi Murmu gives her assent, the bill will become law, marking a significant overhaul of the Waqf Act.

Legal expert and advocate-on-record in the Supreme Court, Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi, who had also presented his views before the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC), clarified the timeline and implications of the new legislation. “From that date, the statute stands amended, and it becomes the law of the land,” Ayyubi said, referring to the notification that will be issued post-presidential approval.

Key Changes and What Comes Next

Ayyubi noted that several amendments — such as the removal of the Waqf Board’s power to determine Waqf property — will be implemented immediately. Others, like the process for inquiries led by district collectors, will require new rules and guidelines. “The survey is now in the hands of the collector, and rules will be needed to outline how inquiries will be conducted,” he said.

Additionally, the government will need to define the role and responsibilities of designated officers handling government properties. “The specifics of who this officer will be, their tenure, and their jurisdiction will be outlined in the rules,” Ayyubi explained.

He also emphasized the importance of procedural clarity, saying, “Some amendments will only require procedural tweaks.”

Timeline for Rule Formation

According to an official from the Union Ministry of Minority Affairs, which is responsible for drafting the rules, the process will begin immediately after the President’s assent. “We are hopeful that the publishing of the rules will not take much time, as the ministry is clear regarding the bill and the amendments,” said the official on condition of anonymity.

As per procedure, rules must be published within six months of the law being enacted. Some rules may require public consultation, with a mandatory 30-day window for public feedback. If there is significant public response, the publication timeline may stretch up to six months. However, rules not needing consultation must still be notified within the same period.

Legislative Procedure Post-Enactment

Former Lok Sabha Secretary General PDT Achary explained the post-enactment process: “Once the rules are formulated, they come into effect and are also laid on the table of both the houses. The members have the right to suggest amendments to these rules.”

Achary also highlighted the flexibility in public consultation, saying, “It’s not compulsory for the government to do so and especially in the case of Waqf wherein the bill was sent to a JPC for consultation, govt might opt to not carry any further consultations.”

He further noted that some governments proactively draft rules before a bill is even passed. “In a few cases, the government makes the rules before the bill has even been tabled or passed in the Parliament, so that as soon as it’s passed, the rules can be notified,” he said.

With the President’s assent and subsequent rule-making, the Waqf (Amendment) Bill is set to bring substantial administrative and procedural changes to how Waqf properties are governed across the country.

Indonesian Rights Groups Urge Parliament to Reject Military Law

March 19, 2025, 4:16 pm

Indonesian student groups and rights organizations have called on parliament to reject draft amendments to military laws, saying that the changes would bring back military control over civilian matters and cause legal ambiguity. Parliament is due to approve the bill on Thursday in a plenary session following the house committee responsible for military affairs’ approval. The amendments would allow more military personnel to serve in civilian posts.

Rights groups, such as the Legal Aid Institute, have condemned the amendments, saying they would send Indonesia back to the times of late strongman Suharto, when the military was in the driving seat of power and dissent was smothered.

“The revision is a legislative crime that endangers Indonesians and the future of democracy,” said Arif Maulana, deputy chairman of the institute.

In the view of Amnesty International Indonesia’s Usman Hamid, expanding the role of the military in civilian life has the potential to result in abuses of authority, human rights abuse, and impunity. Arif Maulana also feared that active soldiers included in the Attorney General’s Office would risk legal opacity, particularly in cases against soldiers. He added that military presence in civilian positions has the potential to lead to the application of violence.

Meanwhile, the government has defended the bill, stating that revisions were made to address concerns. Officials argue that most military personnel appointed to civilian positions would first be required to resign.

Budi Djiwandono, the deputy chairman of the parliamentary committee in charge of the bill and nephew of President Prabowo Subianto, guaranteed that civil supremacy would prevail. He also explained that active military officers would not be assigned to state-owned enterprises, rejecting concerns about their entry into business.

But opposition members, such as Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle’s Nico Siahaan, have bashed the new agencies where active-duty personnel could be assigned. These are the state secretariat, the Attorney General’s Office, and the anti-terror and narcotics agencies.

As the vote draws near, rights organizations have organized protests outside parliament on Thursday, calling citizens to express their dissent. The opposition party has also demanded sustained monitoring of the implementation of the law to avoid further military control over civilian institutions.

‘Ramayana: The Legend of Prince Rama’ to Screen at Parliament

February 2, 2025, 5:30 pm

Movie distribution company Geek Pictures has announced that it will screen the 1993 Japanese-Indian anime film ‘Ramayana: The Legend of Prince Rama’ in the Parliament on February 15. Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla and other members of Parliament, as well as special invitees from the cultural sector, will be attending the screening.

Arjun Aggarwal, co-founder, Geek Pictures spoke at the event. “We feel truly humbled by this action from the Indian Parliament. This is a testament to the proud moment of its recognition at the highest level in the country, for our effort,” he says. “For us, the screening is an occasion not of just a movie but of glory for our nation’s rich past and the very essence of that ageless fable, which inspires and keeps guiding us toward good.”

‘Ramayana: The Legend of Prince Rama’ was released in India on January 24 in 4K format, with new dubs in Hindi, Tamil, and Telugu, besides the original English version. The film was distributed by AA Films and Excel Entertainment. It was initially scheduled for release on October 18, 2024, but was advanced to make it more widely accessible in cinemas.

Produced by Yugo Sako, Ram Mohan, and Koichi Sasaki, ‘Ramayana: The Legend of Prince Rama’ is voiced by renowned actors: Ram, played by Arun Govil; Sita, by Namrata Sawhney; and the late Amrish Puri, as Raavan. The screenplay was written by V Vijayendra Prasad, of the ‘Baahubali’ franchise, ‘Bajrangi Bhaijaan’, and ‘RRR’.

Although ‘Ramayana: The Legend of Prince Rama’ was first screened at the 24th International Film Festival of India in 1993, it did not come to the cinemas then. However, it became popular in India after its repeat shows on various TV channels in early 2000.

New Low in Parliamentary Democracy

December 21, 2024, 4:51 am

Although the winter session of Parliament ended on Friday, yet the events that took place a day earlier leading to verbal exchanges between the treasury members and the Opposition following injuries to at least three MPs, should make our political class to introspect. Never before have such scenes been witnessed and the unsubstantiated charge against the Leader of Opposition, Rahul Gandhi was totally uncalled for. It is extremely unfortunate that such an incident took place in the premises of Parliament House and it is now for an impartial inquiry to ascertain as to who all were at fault. The only way of reaching the truth is by going through the CCTV coverage which must have recorded the entire sequence of events. To the naked eye after watching the TV coverage, it appears that there was a push from the back and this resulted in two BJP MPs being knocked down with another MP accusing Rahul Gandhi of doing this deliberately. It is unthinkable that Rahul would have done anything like that and though a FIR against him has been registered by the Delhi police, it would greatly help to unravel the truth through impartial investigation. It should also be ascertained how the MPs of both sides came so close to each other while demonstrating and how were sticks to placards allowed within the precincts of the Parliament. Somebody needs to be held accountable for this.

The relations between the Opposition and the Treasury benches in both the Houses have been tense and during this session, it was unprecedented when the Vice President who is also the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha was openly accused of taking sides while discharging his duties. The BJP has been quick to defend him but the conduct of both the presiding officers has been under scrutiny for some time, and their rulings have more often than not, raised questions about their unbiased judgment. The House also saw an open clash between the Congress and the BJP over allegations made against Industrialist Gautam Adani and also the attempts to implicate Sonia Gandhi and her family with anti-National forces allegedly prompted by American tycoon George Soros. Instead of focussing on many issues which needed immediate attention, the Parliament spent extra-ordinary time on the Adani-Soros matter and as result the Houses hardly functioned.

There was a debate on the anniversary of the Constitution and expectedly, the time was used by both sides to show each other in poor light. Matters came to a head when Home Minister while speaking in the Rajya Sabha, urged Opposition to stop chanting Ambedkar’s name repeatedly and advised them that if instead they had invoked God with the same zeal, they would go to Heaven. This statement sparked a major controversy and the Congress as well as the entire INDIA bloc accused Amit Shah of insulting Ambedkar, the father of the Constitution. The Congress demanded his resignation and also asked the Prime Minister to sack him. This resulted in verbal clashes which led to the confrontation outside Parliament on Thursday. The point which has arisen is that the Congress and the BJP have both been trying to appropriate Ambedkar’s legacy when both had opposed the legal luminary and National icon for many years. The Sangh Parivar had never endorsed Ambedkar’s concepts which differed from those of the RSS and the Congress till Rajiv Gandhi’s tenure, had not accepted his philosophy either. In fact, soon after Independence after a fallout with Ambedkar, the Congress had propped up Babu Jagjiwan Ram as the Dalit hero and face. Babuji was an extremely competent politician and as long as he lived, he occupied his own space in National politics. However, this space, many believe was at the expense of Dr Ambedkar who was humiliated by the Congress and also made to lose elections because the grand old party never allowed him to emerge on the national scene. Ambedkar was rediscovered and resurrected by Vishwanath Pratap Singh who also conferred the Bharat Ratna on him posthumously. The Socialists and many other leaders opposed to the Congress, backed Ambedkar fully and he was given his rightful place after many years. But had he been alive, he would have been a very sad man if he would have witnessed all that went on in his name. Dr Ambedkar is like a God for many who follow Dalit politics and even beyond that he is viewed as someone who was so learned and perceptive, a truly a national icon. The latest instance where the two major parties clashed with each other was to misappropriate his legacy for the sake of votes. It is hard to imagine that the two outfits would play so much of politics in his name if it had not been beneficial to them for political purposes. Dr Ambedkar was as tall a leader as anyone else has been during the freedom struggle and after that. His followers do not consider him, less than a God or a spiritual messiah who showed them the way of fighting for equality and similar rights with those who were more privileged.
The short point after watching the Parliament proceedings is that the political parties should stop indulging in political gimmicks and instead focus on matters that impact the people. Adani and Soros do not have any resonance with the common man and it is a futile exercise in one sense to make them the central theme of the proceedings. Parliament is supreme and its sanctity can only be upheld if its decorum is maintained and members conduct themselves with both dignity and orderly behaviour.

‘Badge Of Honour In Ambedkar Legacy’: Congress Defends FIR Against Rahul Gandhi’

December 20, 2024, 7:05 am

The Congress party on Friday dismissed the First Information Report (FIR) filed against Rahul Gandhi in connection with a scuffle in Parliament as a “diversionary tactic” in response to his outspoken protest against Union Home Minister Amit Shah’s controversial remarks on Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. The FIR was filed by BJP MPs accusing Gandhi of “physical assault and incitement” during the incident that took place within the Parliament premises.

Congress Defends Rahul Gandhi’s Actions

In a statement on social media, Congress General Secretary KC Venugopal defended Rahul Gandhi, stating that the case against him was a “badge of honour” for standing up in defense of Babasaheb Ambedkar’s legacy. Venugopal also questioned why the Delhi Police had not taken action against BJP MPs who had allegedly physically assaulted Congress women MPs. He further claimed that Rahul Gandhi was already facing 26 FIRs as part of a broader political vendetta by the BJP and assured that such actions would not silence the Congress party or deter their opposition to what they see as the “casteist” RSS-BJP regime.

Details of the FIR and Allegations

The FIR against Rahul Gandhi was lodged by BJP MP Hemang Joshi, who alleged that Gandhi’s actions led to injuries sustained by two BJP MPs. The complaint cited charges including voluntary causing grievous hurt, endangering personal safety, and criminal intimidation, among others. Gandhi has been booked under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (Indian Penal Code) for his involvement in the scuffle.

Parliament Scuffle: BJP and Congress at Odds

The incident unfolded on Thursday near the Makar Dwar, an entrance reserved for lawmakers, during a heated exchange between BJP and Congress MPs. Both parties accused each other of assaulting their members. BJP MPs claimed Gandhi physically assaulted them, leading to injuries, while Congress alleged that BJP legislators had blocked Gandhi’s path and pushed Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, injuring him.

The scuffle occurred in the context of a protest by members of the opposition alliance, INDIA, against Amit Shah’s remarks on Dr. Ambedkar, which had sparked tensions in Parliament. Both parties had concurrent protests, and the situation escalated quickly.

Congress Files Complaint Against BJP Leaders

In response to the allegations against their leader, the Congress filed their own complaint at the Parliament Street Police Station, accusing BJP leaders of misbehaving with Mallikarjun Kharge and calling for an FIR under charges of assault, grievous hurt, and battery.

Political Tensions Rise Ahead of Key Debates

As the political confrontation intensifies, both parties are gearing up for more heated exchanges in Parliament. With both BJP and Congress claiming victimhood, the incident has added fuel to an already contentious political atmosphere, raising questions about decorum and the state of democracy in the country.

Priyanka Gandhi Carries ‘Palestine’ Bag In Parliament | Pic

December 16, 2024, 1:30 pm

Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi is in the news for creating controversy. Recently, a photograph of her carrying a bag with the word ‘Palestine’ on it was doing the rounds on the social media. The image is undated and was posted on social media by Congress spokesperson Shama Mohamed on 16 December. Priyanka Gandhi is smiling with the bag in hand which has attracted the attention of the social media users.

Immediately backlash on social media

The post soon became the talk of the town, with some users criticising her for displaying support for Palestine on Vijay Diwas, a day of great importance to India. The day marks the victory of India over Pakistan during the 1971 war, which resulted in the birth of Bangladesh. Many people feel that it is inappropriate to carry a symbol associated with the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas on the very day that marks India’s military success.

HAVE A LOOK AT THE VIRAL POST:

Smt. @priyankagandhi Ji shows her solidarity with Palestine by carrying a special bag symbolizing her support.

A gesture of compassion, commitment to justice and humanity! She is clear that nobody can violate the Geneva convention pic.twitter.com/2i1XtQRd2T

— Dr. Shama Mohamed (@drshamamohd) December 16, 2024

One user commented that it would have suited Priyanka much better if she had chosen to grab something that represented India‘s victory. The comment was, “She should immediately fire her advisors.” In spite of the criticism, however, the post found its share of supporters, with some of the users agreeing to this within the first few minutes of posting.

Contextual Background of the Palestine-Israel Conflict

The conflict in Palestine has been ongoing, but mainly since Hamas launched an attack on Israeli territory in October 2023, killing over a thousand Israelis. Israel responded by starting military actions withinPalestinian territories. A huge number of Palestinian civilians, and most of them in Gaza, have been killed as the hospitals in the areas experienced heavy fighting.

While the international community condemned the attacks by Hamas, the situation soon evolved into a humanitarian crisis, drawing global attention to the plight of Palestinian citizens. Many people worldwide have expressed solidarity with Palestinians amidst the ongoing conflict.

Growing Divisions Over Symbols and Political Statements

The backlash against the accessory chosen by Priyanka Gandhi reflects a larger debate of how political symbols, such as support for Palestine, are perceived in the context of different places. The debate brings to the fore the highly sensitive nature of the long-standing Israel-Palestine conflict and how global political affairs affect local sentiments.

In fact, as the situation escalates in Palestine, politicians and public figures across the globe would find themselves under intense scrutiny in regards to their associations and displays of solidarity with either side of the conflict.

Major Parliament Standoff: Both Houses Adjourned Early, Speaker Warns Opposition Over Protests

December 10, 2024, 12:34 pm

The Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha were adjourned for the entire day following disruptions during parliamentary proceedings.

Speaker Urges MPs to Maintain House Decorum

Before adjourning the Lok Sabha, Speaker Om Birla appealed to the members to uphold the dignity and decorum of the House. He emphasized the importance of maintaining high standards in the world’s largest democracy.

“Ours is the largest democracy in the world, and it fulfils the hopes and aspirations of the people. We all have to maintain the dignity of the House,” Mr. Birla remarked.

Reflecting on recent events, he expressed disappointment over the behavior observed in the House. “In the last few days, I have seen certain things happening that are not good,” he added, urging members to align their actions with the expectations of the people they represent.

The adjournment reflects ongoing tensions and disagreements within the parliamentary proceedings, with calls for cooperation and decorum remaining a central focus.

“Modi ji sansad me aa….”, Rahul Gandhi Urges PM Modi to Address Adani Allegations in Parliament

December 6, 2024, 4:10 pm

In a pointed critique of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, has called for the Prime Minister to attend the ongoing Winter Session of Parliament and confront the allegations surrounding the Adani Group. Gandhi’s remarks come as the Congress party, along with its INDIA bloc allies, continues to demand a thorough discussion regarding the indictment of Adani by U.S. authorities.

Taking to Facebook, Rahul Gandhi stated, “Modi ji sansad me aao, Adani par jaanch se mat ghabrao” (Modi ji, come to Parliament, don’t be afraid of investigation). His comments reflect the persistent pressure from the opposition to address the serious allegations against the Adani Group, which have been a focal point of contention since the session began.

MPs staged a symbolic protest by wearing masks that read, “Modi Adani, Bhai Bhai”

Earlier in the day, opposition MPs staged a symbolic protest by wearing masks that read, “Modi Adani, Bhai Bhai,” emphasizing their claims of a close relationship between the Prime Minister and the Adani Group. Congress leaders Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi were also seen holding copies of the Constitution, underscoring their assertion that constitutional rights have been violated in the context of the Adani issue.

Congress MP KC Venugopal remarked, “It is B. R. Ambedkar’s death anniversary, the person who gave the Constitution of India. The constitutional right has been violated here for Adani. We are doing a symbolic protest. Whenever the name of Adani comes, the government of India wants to divert the issue. Let them divert the issue; we will continue our protests.”

In response to the allegations made by the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission against directors of Adani Green, the Adani Group has firmly denied any wrongdoing. The BJP has also defended Prime Minister Modi, asserting that the allegations are baseless and emphasizing that the law will take its course.

“The US Department of Justice and the US Securities and Exchange Commission against directors of Adani Green are baseless and denied,” a BJP statement read. It further noted that, as per the U.S. Department of Justice, “the charges in the indictment are allegations and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.”

The Adani Group reiterated its commitment to maintaining the “highest standards of governance, transparency, and regulatory compliance across all jurisdictions of its operations.”

The Winter Session of Parliament commenced on November 25 and is scheduled to continue until December 20, although both Houses have faced disruptions due to ongoing protests.

Parliament Winter Session: Opposition Protests In Lok Sabha, Walks Out On First Working Day

December 3, 2024, 11:42 am

Opposition Protest in Lok Sabha On the first working day of the Winter Session, opposition members walked out from the Lok Sabha after a week of deadlock, highlighting the tense political climate in the parliament. Congress-led protest brought to fore the deepening fissures among opposition parties as some members from Samajwadi and Trinamool Congress were conspicuous by their absence.

This absence has highlighted the fraying within the opposition, as these parties failed to unitedly force a strategy through which they could unite under before their parliamentary approach.

Congress in Firm Stance on Question of Accountability Congress MP Renuka Chowdhury described her party’s commitment: “It is not our responsibility for the House to function as much as it is everybody’s responsibility.”. She said, “We make all efforts from our end to run the House because the public expects us to raise their voice here strongly. If the government wants to run the House, it will function. If they do not want that, then everyone knows what the conspiracy is.” Chowdhury made it clear that the onus of running the proceedings lies on those in positions of authority within the House.

Cyclone Fengal being debated in Rajya Sabha Even as the walkout continued to unfold in the Lok Sabha, the Rajya Sabha sat discussing Cyclone Fengal, which had landed just two days ago on the Puducherry coast. The cyclone has run amok in Tamil Nadu, causing heavy rainfall and flooding the very state. Members of the House are debating the affect of the cyclone and the measures that need to be taken to help the affected zones.

Poonawalla Hits Out at Congress for Disrupting Parliament

December 3, 2024, 10:52 am

BJP spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla criticized Congress on Tuesday, accusing the party of using Parliament to advance its “Parivar ka agenda.” He argued that Congress is prioritizing confrontation over consensus and disruption over dialogue. “After being badly thrashed in Maharashtra and Haryana elections, Congress, out of sheer frustration, has started using Parliament as a platform for implementing its ‘Parivar ka agenda’. It puts confrontation above consensus. It puts disruption above dialogue,” Poonawalla stated. He also highlighted that this approach has led to a significant loss for taxpayers.

Jairam Ramesh Blames Government

Meanwhile, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh blamed the BJP-led government for the ongoing washout of Parliament proceedings. He alleged that the opposition was being denied the chance to speak. Ramesh said, “Who is responsible for this washout? It is the government that is responsible. Opposition wants discussion on issues of Adani, Manipur, Sambhal, Ajmer, unemployment… But our notices are not even mentioned, and our leaders are not allowed to speak.” As a result, Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha were adjourned for the fifth consecutive day without any substantial business being conducted.

Opposition Pushes for Discussion on Key Issues

Additionally, Ramesh emphasized that various parties have different priorities, but they all wanted to address significant issues. He mentioned Congress’s demand for a two-day discussion on the 75th year of the Constitution. Furthermore, Ramesh pointed out that the opposition wanted to discuss topics such as unemployment and the Adani issue. He also noted that while the TMC is part of the INDIA alliance, they agreed that the Adani issue remains crucial.

Parliament Set to Resume Normal Functioning

Despite the ongoing disruptions, Parliament is expected to resume its normal functioning on Tuesday. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju met with floor leaders and addressed the stalemate. He confirmed that all parties had agreed discussions would begin the next day.

Parliament Adjourned till Dec 2 as Opposition Protests Persist Over Adani and Other Issues

November 29, 2024, 1:45 pm

Parliament has been adjourned until December 2, as opposition MPs continued their protests, failing to conduct substantial business for the fourth consecutive day. The proceedings have stalled since the start of the Winter Session, with opposition parties raising concerns over the Adani issue and violence in Manipur and Sambhal.

Initially, the Rajya Sabha was adjourned, during which Rajya Sabha Chairman and Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar expressed his discontent, stating that the ongoing disruptions are not “public-centric.” He remarked, “This cannot be appreciated. We have become a laughing stock, and parliament disruptions are in public distaste. We are creating a very bad precedent. Our actions are not public-centric. We are getting into irrelevance.” Dhankhar highlighted that Rule 267 is being misused as a tool for disruption and expressed his deep anguish and regret over the interruption of the House’s normal business.

Opposition members have been demanding discussions on the Adani issue

Opposition members have been persistently demanding discussions on the Adani issue, the violence in Sambhal, and the situation in Manipur, resorting to slogan-shouting within Parliament. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh criticized the central government, questioning why it is not resisting the adjournments. He stated, “Yet another day of a washout in the Parliament on the Modani issue. Both Houses got adjourned today after only a few minutes. The big mystery is why the Govt is not resisting the adjournments. On the contrary, the government is facilitating the aggression of the INDIA parties on Modani especially – as also on Manipur, Sambhal, and Delhi’s law and order. Clearly, it has much to feel defensive and apologetic about,” Ramesh posted on X.

Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi urged the government to clarify which issues it intends to address and when. He remarked, “Did the government say that there will be a discussion on Adani, Manipur, Sambhal, China, and foreign policy? Nothing has come from the government. They have neither clarified the subject nor the date. The day they clarify the subject and the date, we will be able to run the House. But we are seeing a new arrogance in the government.”

Congress MP Kumari Selja echoed the sentiment, stating that the government seems disinterested in running the House. “They don’t want discussion. We want discussion, but they don’t listen to or take the opposition into confidence. We want the House to function. We are demanding a JPC (Joint Parliamentary Committee) on the Adani issue, but they don’t want it,” Selja said.

Congress MP Karti P Chidambaram added, “I hope the government is large-hearted and allows the opposition the space to raise issues of importance. It’s incumbent that the government finds a way in which the opposition can have its say and the government can have its way. The government is in a position to give, and the government must give…”

In response to the ongoing controversies, the Adani Group has denied the bribery allegations made against it in the United States. Adani Green Energy Ltd stated that media reports claiming that certain directors, including Gautam Adani, Sagar Adani, and Vineet Jaain, have been charged with violations of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) are incorrect.

The first session of the winter Parliament began on November 25, but both Houses have been adjourned early due to disruptions. The winter session is scheduled to continue until December 20.

Winter Session Of Parliament To Start Today; Focus On Waqf, Banking Laws

November 25, 2024, 12:05 am

The Winter Session of Parliament is set to commence on Monday and will run until December 20.

Key legislative discussions include the Waqf Act (Amendment) Bill and several others listed for introduction, consideration, and passing. Among the bills slated are the Mussalman Wakf (Repeal) Bill, the Bharatiya Vayuyan Vidheyak, the Disaster Management (Amendment) Bill, the Readjustment of Representation of Scheduled Tribes in Assembly Constituencies of the State of Goa Bill, the Bills of Lading Bill, the Carriage of Goods by Sea Bill, the Railways (Amendment) Bill, the Banking Laws (Amendment) Bill, and the Oilfields (Regulation and Development) Amendment Bill.

Also included on the agenda are the Boilers Bill, the Rashtriya Sahkari Vishwavidyalaya Bill, the Punjab Courts (Amendment) Bill, the Merchant Shipping Bill, the Coastal Shipping Bill, and the Indian Ports Bill. Parliament will observe no sittings on November 26 to mark “Constitution Day,” according to an official statement.

Must Read: 3 Dead, 30+ Cops Hurt In Violent Clashes During Mosque Survey In UP’s Sambhal

Ahead of the session’s commencement, floor leaders of the INDIA bloc are scheduled to meet on November 25 at 10 a.m. in Parliament House to strategize their approach. Congress MP and Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge is expected to finalize the Opposition’s strategy, with the Congress likely to raise issues such as the Manipur crisis and bribery allegations against the Adani Group.

Earlier, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju emphasized the government’s readiness for discussions while urging for a peaceful session. Following an all-party meeting held on Sunday in Delhi, Rijiju stated, “A total of 42 leaders from 30 political parties were present in the meeting. There are many topics. Everyone has asked for discussion on some topics but we want that there should be a good discussion in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. The government is ready to discuss any topic. Our only request is that the House should run well and there should be no ruckus. Every member wants to participate in the discussion but the House should run well. To run the winter session well, everyone’s cooperation is needed and everyone’s participation is necessary.”

The meeting, presided over by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, was attended by key leaders, including Congress MPs Jairam Ramesh, Pramod Tiwari, and K Suresh, as well as JD(U) MP Upendra Kushwaha. Representatives from other parties, such as PV Midhun Reddy (YSRCP), V Vijaysai Reddy (YSRCP), Sasmit Patra (BJD), Vaiko (MDMK), Ramgopal Yadav (SP), and Lavu Sri Krishna Devarayalu (TDP), also participated.

Also Read: Delhi LG Appoints 232 General Duty Medical Officers

Caught Snoozing In Parliament! PM Ishiba Dozes Off, Video Goes Viral | WATCH

November 13, 2024, 11:48 am

Shigeru Ishiba, the president of Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), faced criticism after being caught dozing off during a parliamentary session on Monday. Ishiba was re-elected as Japan’s prime minister in a closely watched vote, but the viral video of him briefly closing his eyes as the votes were being counted quickly became the center of attention.

Drowsiness Caught on Camera

Footage from the session shows Ishiba with his head down and eyes closed while the votes were tallied. Social media users quickly began commenting on the incident, with many questioning his attentiveness during such an important moment. The hashtag #PMIshibaSnoozing spread across platforms, bringing a wave of criticism toward the prime minister.

WATCH THE VIRAL VIDEO:

Japanese social media was quick to point out that PM Shigeru Ishiba appeared to doze off during Monday’s vote in parliament for a new prime minister.

The reason? Cold medicine, said Chief Cabinet Secretary Hayashi, who’s seen in the video beside Ishiba, checking if he’s alright. pic.twitter.com/CY6PX864Vl

— Hanako Montgomery (@HanakoMontgome1) November 11, 2024

Government Responds to Health Concerns

In response to growing concerns about Ishiba’s health, the government’s top spokesman, Yoshimasa Hayashi, addressed the media. Hayashi explained that the prime minister had been working late into the night before the session and was feeling unwell due to a cold. He reassured the public that aside from the cold, there were no major health issues affecting Ishiba.

Criticism from Opponents and Lawmakers

Despite the government’s explanation, Ishiba’s behavior did not go unnoticed by political opponents. An opposition lawmaker pointed out that the act of nodding off during such an important election showed a lack of urgency and focus. “If he was really asleep, that shows his marked lack of tension,” the lawmaker was quoted as saying by Kyodo News.

Nobuyuki Baba, leader of the Japan Innovation Party, also weighed in, expressing concern over Ishiba’s actions during such a critical moment. “It was inappropriate for one to take a rest during such an election,” Baba said, referencing the vote to decide the head of Japan’s government.

Re-election as Prime Minister

Despite the controversy surrounding the incident, Ishiba was successfully confirmed as Japan’s prime minister during the session. This marks an important milestone for his new administration, although his LDP and coalition partner Komeito failed to secure a majority in the recent Lower House election.

The viral video, however, quickly overshadowed his victory, drawing attention to his moment of drowsiness rather than the parliamentary vote itself.

Rahul Gandhi Advocates for Restoring J&K Statehood

September 25, 2024, 5:51 pm

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi emphasized the party’s commitment to restoring Jammu and Kashmir’s (J&K) statehood during a rally in Jammu on Wednesday. He asserted that the Congress would fight for this cause both in Parliament and through public demonstrations.

Allegations Against BJP’s Governance

Gandhi criticized the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for allegedly stripping J&K of its statehood in order to govern through a lieutenant governor (LG) and facilitate the benefits for outsiders at the expense of local residents. He stated, “Until the lieutenant governor is here, outsiders will continue to get benefits at the expense of the people of J&K.”

Call for People’s Rights

The rally coincided with the second phase of J&K’s assembly elections, marking the first elections since 2014. Gandhi argued that these elections are fundamentally about the rights of the people. He assured attendees that once statehood is restored, a government would protect local industries and facilitate access to banking for the common populace.

Gandhi highlighted that historically, Union territories have been granted statehood while states have been divided, but never has a state been downgraded to a Union territory. He termed the removal of J&K’s statehood as a “grave injustice” and expressed disappointment that the BJP opted for elections before restoring statehood.

Gandhi pledged that if the BJP fails to restore statehood, the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA) would ensure it becomes a priority under their governance. “This is your right,” he stated.

Gandhi also criticized the BJP for allegedly favoring prominent business tycoons, specifically targeting the impact of GST and demonetization on the Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSME) sector. He claimed that these policies disproportionately benefited billionaires like Ambani and Adani while harming local businesses and employment opportunities.

Describing Jammu as a business hub linking Kashmir to the rest of the country, Gandhi expressed concern over the state of the MSME sector. He noted that local entrepreneurs indicated the sector has been severely weakened, and stressed that unless small and medium businesses are supported, youth employment will continue to suffer.

Waqf Amendment Bill Introduced in Lok Sabha; Government Agrees to JPC Scrutiny

August 8, 2024, 4:57 pm

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, aimed at addressing issues related to the powers of State Waqf Boards, the registration and survey of Waqf properties, and the removal of encroachments, was introduced in the Lok Sabha on Thursday by Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju.

The bill proposes to amend the Waqf Act, 1995, and rename it the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Act, 1995. It seeks to clearly define “waqf” as property held by individuals practicing Islam for at least five years, ensure that Waqf-alal-aulad does not infringe on women’s inheritance rights, and update various provisions for improved management and representation within Waqf institutions.

Opposition parties, including Congress, DMK, NCP, Trinamool Congress, and AIMIM, strongly criticized the bill, arguing that it violates federalism and constitutional principles. They called for the bill’s withdrawal or its referral to a standing committee for further examination.

In response to the opposition’s concerns, Rijiju agreed to refer the bill to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) for detailed scrutiny. “We are not avoiding any scrutiny. If it needs to go to a committee, I propose that a JPC be formed to discuss it in detail,” he said.

Rijiju also addressed the opposition’s points and noted that the bill is based on recommendations from a panel established during the Congress-led UPA government. Additionally, he introduced the Mussalman Wakf (Repeal) Bill, 2024, which aims to repeal the Mussalman Wakf Act, 1923.

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill includes provisions to establish a separate Board of Auqaf for Boharas and Aghakhanis, ensure broader representation within the Central Waqf Council and State Waqf Boards, and streamline Waqf registration and mutation procedures. It also proposes the omission of certain outdated provisions and reforms to the Tribunal structure.

The government has decided to withdraw the Waqf Properties (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Bill, 2014, previously introduced in the Rajya Sabha under the Congress-led UPA government.

Parliament Debate: Akhilesh, Amit Shah Spar Over Waqf

August 8, 2024, 4:11 pm

Union Minority Minister Kiren Rijiju introduced the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, in the Lok Sabha, seeking to amend the Waqf Act, 1995. The proposed bill aims to address issues related to the authority of State Waqf Boards and the Central Waqf Council, enhance the registration and survey of Waqf properties, and tackle encroachments.

During the parliamentary discussion, Akhilesh Yadav of the Samajwadi Party criticized the bill, calling it a “well-thought-out political strategy.” He questioned the need for nominations when a democratic process is already in place and noted that other religious bodies do not involve non-community members.

Yadav also expressed concerns about historical precedents affecting future generations and accused the BJP of introducing the bill to placate its narrow-minded supporters. He further claimed that even the Speaker’s rights are being encroached upon and emphasized the need to protect democratic principles.

In response, Amit Shah rebutted Yadav’s comments, stating, “I disagree with the assertion that the chairman’s authority is exclusive to the opposition. The authority of the chairman belongs to the entire house, and such statements are unacceptable. You are not the sole protector of the chairman’s authority.”

Vinesh Phogat Row Sparks Parliament Walkout as Opposition Demands Discussion

August 8, 2024, 12:47 pm

INDIA bloc members today walked out from Rajya Sabha after they were not allowed to discuss the disqualification of wrestler Vinesh Phogat from the Paris Olympics 2024.

The grappler was disqualified from the 50 kg women’s wrestling event for breaching the weight mark. Vinesh was scheduled to take on the United States’s Sarah Ann Hildebrandt in the gold medal match on August 7.

After the listed papers were tabled, Leader of Opposition and Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge attempted to raise the disqualification issue, questioning “who is behind” it. However, Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar did not permit Kharge to speak on the matter. Shortly after, Trinamool Congress MP Derek O’Brien also attempted to raise some issues but was similarly denied by the Chair.

Chairman Dhankhar admonished O’Brien, saying, “You are shouting at the Chair. Your conduct is the ugliest in the House. I condemn your actions. Next time I will show you the door.” As tensions rose, Opposition leaders staged a walkout. Dhankhar further remarked that the Opposition believes they are “the only ones whose hearts are bleeding,” adding, “The entire nation is in pain… But to politicise it is the greatest disrespect to her (Ms Phogat).”

Phogat, who announced her retirement from wrestling today, had made history as the first Indian female wrestler to reach the final of the 50kg Olympic wrestling category by winning three matches on Tuesday. The 29-year-old, who usually competes in the 53 kg category, had moved down to the 50 kg weight class for the Paris Olympic Games.

Earlier on Tuesday, members of the INDIA bloc had walked out of the Lok Sabha after expressing dissatisfaction with Union Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya’s statement on Phogat. Some opposition leaders criticized Mandaviya for focusing on the financial assistance provided to Phogat for her Olympic preparations.

Jaishankar’s Update: India Maintains Vigil Over Bangladesh Crisis

August 6, 2024, 2:56 pm

In a detailed address to the Rajya Sabha, External Affairs Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar provided an update on the evolving situation in Bangladesh, highlighting India’s ongoing efforts to safeguard its nationals and monitor the crisis closely.

Dr. Jaishankar informed the House that India is in “close and continuous touch” with its community in Bangladesh through its diplomatic missions. There are approximately 19,000 Indian nationals currently in Bangladesh, including about 9,000 students. The minister noted that the majority of these students had returned to India by July, easing some concerns over their safety.

The External Affairs Minister also emphasized that India is vigilant regarding the status of minorities in Bangladesh amid the ongoing unrest. Reports indicate that various groups and organizations are working to ensure the protection and well-being of minorities. Dr. Jaishankar assured that India will remain “deeply concerned” until law and order are fully restored in the neighboring country.

In light of the complex and volatile situation, India’s border guarding forces have been instructed to maintain heightened alertness. Dr. Jaishankar revealed that in the past 24 hours, there has been constant communication with authorities in Dhaka to stay abreast of developments and coordinate any necessary responses.

Dr. Jaishankar’s remarks underscore India’s commitment to the safety of its citizens abroad and its proactive stance in monitoring and responding to regional crises. The situation in Bangladesh remains fluid, with India closely observing and engaging with both its nationals and the broader geopolitical landscape.

Speaking on the situation in Bangladesh, External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar says, “Our understanding is that after a meeting with leaders of security establishments, PM Sheikh Hasina apparently made the decision to resign. At very short notice, she requested approval to come for the moment to India. She arrived yesterday evening in Delhi.”

Speaking in Rajya Sabha Jaishankar added, “…On 5th August, demonstrators converged in Dhaka despite the curfew. Our understanding is that after a meeting with leaders of the security establishment, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina apparently made the decision to resign. At very short notice, she requested approval to come for the moment to India. We simultaneously received a request for flight clearance from Bangladesh authorities. She arrived yesterday evening in Delhi.”

EAM Jaishankar to Address Parliament on Bangladesh Crisis Today

August 6, 2024, 12:56 pm

Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla announced on Tuesday that External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar would address the lower house of Parliament regarding the situation in Bangladesh. Jaishankar is scheduled to make a suo moto statement at 3:30 pm in the Lok Sabha and at 2:30 pm in the Rajya Sabha.

Earlier in the day, Jaishankar chaired an all-party meeting in Parliament, briefing leaders on the current developments in Bangladesh and the prevailing situation in the neighboring country. During this meeting, Jaishankar mentioned that Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina had moved to India and that the Indian government would support her while she decides her next steps.

Jaishankar took to X (formerly Twitter) to state, “Briefed an All-Party meeting in Parliament today about the ongoing developments in Bangladesh. Appreciate the unanimous support and understanding that was extended.”

He also informed the leaders that the central government was in contact with the Bangladesh Army. He emphasized that the situation is fluid and assured that the government would take appropriate action at the right time.

According to sources, there are 20,000 Indian nationals in Bangladesh, and 8,000 have already returned. Jaishankar confirmed that the Indian government remains in contact with these nationals, and the High Commission in Bangladesh continues to operate. The leaders were also informed that the focus is on protecting minorities in Bangladesh.

During the all-party meeting, Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, inquired about India’s long-term and short-term strategy. The government responded that they would continue to analyze the evolving situation. Gandhi also questioned the potential involvement of foreign entities, to which the central government assured that all angles were being considered. After being briefed, Gandhi expressed his support for the government’s measures taken in the national interest.

Bangladesh is currently experiencing a fluid political situation, with Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina resigning amid mounting protests, primarily led by students demanding an end to the quota system for government jobs. These protests have evolved into broader anti-government demonstrations.

In Dhaka, the leaders of the Anti-Discrimination Student Movement have proposed an interim government led by Nobel Laureate Dr. Muhammad Yunus to address the ongoing challenges in Bangladesh. Meanwhile, Sheikh Hasina arrived in India on Monday evening after resigning. It remains unclear whether she will stay in Delhi or move to another location.

Government Expected to Introduce Bill to Amend Wakf Act Today

August 5, 2024, 11:35 am

The government plans to introduce a Bill in Parliament to amend the 1995 Wakf Act today. The proposed amendments aim to restrict the Waqf Board’s power to designate properties and will require Waqf boards to register their assets with district collectors to guarantee accurate property valuation. The objective to introduce this bill is to enhance accountability, transparency, and ensure the mandatory inclusion of women in Waqf boards. Currently, there are 30 Waqf boards across the country.

Jaya Bachchan & Jagdeep Dhankar’s Playful Banter Sparks Laughter In Parliament | Watch

August 2, 2024, 6:15 pm

In a rare display of humor in the Rajya Sabha, Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar and actor-turned-politician Jaya Bachchan shared a playful exchange that had the entire House laughing. The moment began when Bachchan asked Dhankhar if he had taken a lunch break. Dhankhar responded with a witty comment about being serious on lighter notes, which set the tone for their light-hearted banter.

This amusing episode contrasted sharply with recent tensions in the Rajya Sabha. Just three days prior, Bachchan had taken issue with Deputy Chairman Harivansh referring to her as “Jaya Amitabh Bachchan.” She had stated that women should be recognized by their own identities, not solely by their husband’s name.

Watch the video here:

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by The Daily Guardian (@thedailyguardianofficial)

During the exchange, Jaya Bachchan joked, “I, Jaya Amitabh Bachchan, want to ask…” prompting Chairman Dhankhar to laugh and sparking a wave of chuckles throughout the House.

Bachchan continued by teasing Dhankhar about his frequent mentions of Jairam’s name, quipping that he must be unable to digest his food without mentioning it. Dhankhar replied, “Sir, did you get a lunch break today? You didn’t, right? That’s why you keep mentioning Jairam’s name again and again. Because you can’t digest your food without remembering him or mentioning his name…” He added, “I want to say one thing on a lighter note… I didn’t have lunch during the recess… but after that, I had lunch with Jairam.”

Dhankhar also expressed his admiration for Jaya Bachchan and her husband Amitabh, saying, “Today, I want to say something to the House… this is the first time… I’m a fan of yours as well as Amitabh Bachchan’s.”

Bachchan folded her hands in respect and asked, “Why is this the first time?”

Dhankhar responded, “Because until today, I never met a couple.”

With a smile, Bachchan replied, “Yes, that’s why my name is like that… thank you.”

Congress Responds To Anurag Thakur’s Remark On Rahul Gandhi’s Caste

July 30, 2024, 10:15 pm

On Tuesday, Congress General Secretary Priyanka Gandhi Vadra criticized BJP MP Anurag Thakur for allegedly questioning Rahul Gandhi’s caste. She stated that 80% of the country’s population was insulted in Parliament. During the Union Budget discussion in the Lok Sabha, Thakur remarked about the unknown caste of those advocating for a caste census, which caused an uproar. Thakur later clarified he did not name anyone.

Priyanka’s Statement:
“A socio-economic caste census is the demand of 80% of the people of this country. Today, it was said in Parliament that those whose caste is not known talk about a caste census,” Priyanka said in a Hindi post on X. She questioned if 80% of India’s population would be abused in Parliament and asked Prime Minister Narendra Modi to clarify the situation.

Pawan Khera’s Statement:
Congress’s media and publicity department head Pawan Khera declared that the caste of Rahul Gandhi’s family is “martyrdom.” He criticized the BJP’s mindset, stating, “This mindset can only be of the BJP that such abuses are used for a person who is the son of a family of martyrs. He is told that your caste is not known. We will tell you what his caste is. Rahul Gandhi’s father is a martyr and this family’s caste is martyrdom. This the RSS, the BJP, and Thakur can never understand.”

Rahul Gandhi’s Response:
Rahul Gandhi claimed he was insulted and abused by Thakur. “Whoever raises the issues of Adivasi, Dalit, and the backward, is abused. I will happily accept these abuses…Anurag Thakur has abused me and insulted me. But I do not want any apology from him,” Rahul Gandhi said.

Anurag Thakur’s Original Remark:
Earlier, Thakur said, “Those whose caste is not known, talk about the caste census. I want to remind the Speaker that in this House itself, a former prime minister RG-1 (Rajiv Gandhi) had opposed reservation for OBCs.”

Support from Akhilesh Yadav:
Samajwadi Party (SP) chief Akhilesh Yadav, an ally of Rahul Gandhi, also criticized Thakur, questioning how he could ask about Rahul Gandhi’s caste.

Jaya Bachchan Upset Over ‘Amitabh’ Title in Parliament: “Women Have Their Own Identity”

July 30, 2024, 12:26 am

Jaya Bachchan made headlines in Parliament today when Deputy Chairman Harivansh Narayan Singh referred to her as ‘Jaya Amitabh Bachchan’. Upset by this, Bachchan took a moment to assert her individual identity.

When called to speak, Bachchan remarked, “Sir, sirf Jaya Bachchan bolte to kaafi hojata” (It would’ve been enough to call me Jaya Bachchan). She expressed her discontent, saying, “There’s a new trend where women are identified by their husband’s name. Women have no identity or achievements of their own. This new trend is just…”

Public reaction was mixed, with some praising her bravery. One fan questioned, “Why was Amitabh added? If she hasn’t used it, who did?” Another supporter commented, “She’s right. She was a successful actress before becoming a ‘Bachchan’. How far we’ve come.”

Navya Naveli Nanda, Jaya’s granddaughter, once spoke about her in 2021, calling her an ‘inspiration’. She praised Jaya Bachchan’s ability to create her own identity and voice, describing her as “unapologetic, unfiltered, and strong.”

Parliament Debates Deaths At Rau’s IAS: Calls For Action And Investigation

July 29, 2024, 3:08 pm

Both the Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha have discussed the tragic deaths of civil services aspirants at Rau’s IAS basement library in Delhi.

In the Rajya Sabha, Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar expressed concern about the commercialization of coaching centers. He mentioned that coaching has become a business, with ads frequently appearing in newspapers. Dhankhar decided to have a brief discussion on the incident and will meet with party leaders to address the issue.

In the Lok Sabha, the issue was raised during Zero Hour. BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj criticized the AAP government, accusing it of “criminal negligence” regarding the deaths. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, who visited the hospital where the injured are being treated, called for financial compensation for the victims. Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav and Congress MP Pappu Yadav also demanded an investigation into the incident.

Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) commissioner Ashwani Kumar announced that a junior engineer had been fired and an assistant engineer suspended due to lapses related to the incident. On Monday, bulldozers were seen clearing illegal encroachments on the streets of Karol Bagh, where Rau’s IAS Study Circle is located.

Delhi BJP workers protested outside the AAP office, blaming the AAP government for the incident. A public interest litigation (PIL) was filed in the Delhi High Court, seeking a high-level investigation into the deaths and the MCD officials who allegedly ignored a complaint from June 26. The PIL also called for the formation of district-level committees to address illegal commercial constructions.

All Party Meeting: Calls For Special Category Status For Three States Intensify

July 22, 2024, 9:38 am

Three political parties, including an ally of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), have called for special category status for three states at an all-party meeting held on Sunday, ahead of the Parliament session on Monday.

The Janata Dal (United) [JD(U)], which governs Bihar in coalition with the BJP, sought special category status for the state. Similarly, the Biju Janata Dal (BJD) and the Yuvajana Sramika Rythu Congress Party (YSRCP) demanded the same status for Odisha and Andhra Pradesh, respectively. Notably, the Telugu Desam Party (TDP), the ruling party in Andhra Pradesh and a BJP ally, did not reiterate its previous demand for special status during the meeting.

Chirag Paswan, president of the Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas), another BJP ally, also urged for special category status for Bihar.

Special category status would grant these states higher funds from the central government along with special tax benefits. No state has been given this status since the BJP came to power in 2014, while ten states had received this classification before then.

JD(U) working president and Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Jha emphasized the need for a special package for Bihar if special category status is not feasible. “Special category status for the state has been our stand since the beginning… if that is not possible, then a special package should be announced,” Jha said.

The JD(U)’s national executive had passed a resolution on June 29, demanding either special category status or a special package for Bihar. This marked a pragmatic shift as the Modi government had previously ruled out granting special status based on the 14th Finance Commission’s report.

The BJD, led by Naveen Patnaik, supported the demands for special status and emphasized Odisha’s long-standing request. BJD leader and Rajya Sabha MP Sasmit Patra stated, “Odisha has been deprived of the special category status for more than two decades. The BJD has been demanding the status. States such as Andhra Pradesh and Bihar have also made similar demands.”

YSRCP MP Vijaysai Reddy highlighted the issue of reduced revenue shares for states that control their population growth and called for addressing this through the finance commission.

Opposition leaders criticized the TDP, a crucial BJP ally, for not raising the issue of special category status for Andhra Pradesh during the meeting. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh noted this silence and recalled how the BJD reminded BJP leaders of their 2014 promise to grant Odisha special status.

JD(U) also addressed the recurring flood issue in Bihar, urging for a dam over the Kosi river, and expressed opposition to the Uttar Pradesh government’s directive for eateries along Kanwar Yatra routes to display owners’ names, citing concerns over discrimination.

The BJD raised several issues, including housing for the rural poor, deprived communities under the ST list, and infrastructure deficiencies. They also demanded action against the alleged assault of a Raj Bhavan employee by the Odisha governor’s son.

TDP lawmaker LS Krishna Devarayalu and other party members, including Congress, raised the need for central hall facilities for MPs, highlighting the importance of timely ministerial responses during parliamentary sessions.

Congress Names Gaurav Gogoi As New Deputy Leader In Lok Sabha

July 14, 2024, 1:29 pm

In a significant move, the Congress party has appointed Gaurav Gogoi as the new Deputy Leader in the Lok Sabha. This decision aims to enhance the party’s leadership and strategic presence in the Parliament.

Gaurav Gogoi, the son of former Assam Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi, has been an active and influential member of the Congress party. His new role as the Deputy Leader is expected to bring fresh energy and perspective to the party’s activities in the Lok Sabha.

The appointment comes at a crucial time when the Congress is gearing up for the upcoming parliamentary sessions and future elections. Party members believe that Gogoi’s leadership will strengthen their position and help in effectively voicing their concerns and policies.

Gogoi expressed his gratitude for the new role and emphasized his commitment to work diligently for the party and the people. “I am honored by this responsibility and will strive to contribute to the party’s growth and success,” he stated.

With Gogoi taking on this important position, the Congress party is hopeful for a more dynamic and robust representation in the Lok Sabha. This move is seen as a step towards rejuvenating the party’s leadership and preparing for the challenges ahead.

Parliamentary Expunction Practices

July 13, 2024, 4:05 am

In the hallowed halls of India’s Parliament, words carry immense weight. They shape laws, influence policy, and reflect the will of the people. But what happens when those words cross a line? This question lies at the heart of a recent controversy that has gripped the nation’s legislative bodies.

The recent session of the 18th Lok Sabha turned into a hotbed of contention, casting a spotlight on a long-standing parliamentary practice: the expunction of remarks from official records. This procedure, intended to uphold decorum and protect the integrity of parliamentary discourse, has become a contentious issue between the opposition and the ruling party.

During this session, statements made by key opposition figures, including Rahul Gandhi, Mallikarjun Kharge, and Jairam Ramesh, were expunged from the records of both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. This move has sparked renewed debates about the delicate balance between free speech and parliamentary propriety. The incident has raised critical questions about the limits of acceptable discourse within the hallowed halls of India’s democracy.

The Constitutional Framework and Rules Governing Expunction

At the heart of this issue lies Article 105 of the Indian Constitution, which grants Members of Parliament (MPs) the privilege of freedom of speech within the legislative chambers. However, this freedom is not absolute and is subject to other constitutional provisions and the rules of each house.

The power to expunge remarks rests with the presiding officers of both houses. In the Lok Sabha, this authority belongs to the Speaker, while in the Rajya Sabha, it falls to the Chairman.

Rule 261 of the Rajya Sabha and Rules 380 and 381 of the Lok Sabha provide the legal basis for expunction. These rules empower the presiding officers to remove words or phrases deemed “defamatory, indecent, unparliamentary or undignified” from the official records.

The Process of Expunction and Its Implications

When a remark is expunged, it is effectively erased from the official record of parliamentary proceedings. In practice, this means that the offending words are replaced with asterisks in the transcript, accompanied by a footnote explaining that the content was “expunged as ordered by the Chair.”

This process is not merely a clerical exercise but carries significant implications. Once expunged, these remarks cease to exist in the official narrative of parliamentary discourse.
Any subsequent publication of expunged content could potentially lead to charges of breach of parliamentary privilege. This aspect of expunction underscores its gravity and the importance placed on maintaining the sanctity of official records.

Grounds for Expunction: A Delicate Balance

The grounds for expunction are multifaceted and reflect the complex nature of parliamentary discourse. Unparliamentary language, personal allegations, and irrelevant remarks are among the most common reasons for expunction.

However, the scope extends beyond mere decorum. Remarks that could be prejudicial to national interest, detrimental to friendly relations with foreign states, or likely to offend national sentiments may also face expunction.

The presiding officers must navigate a delicate balance, ensuring that the freedom of speech is preserved while maintaining the dignity and efficacy of parliamentary proceedings.

Historical Context and Evolving Standards

The practice of expunction is not new to Indian parliamentary history. A notable example dates back to the time of Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, who objected to the derogatory mention of the President of Pakistan during a parliamentary session.

This incident highlights how expunction has long been used as a tool to maintain diplomatic sensitivities and uphold the decorum of international relations within parliamentary debates.

Over time, the scope of expunction in India’s Parliament has expanded significantly. Originally aimed at maintaining decorum and safeguarding the integrity of parliamentary proceedings, it now encompasses broader considerations, such as protecting the reputation of the armed forces and fostering religious harmony. This evolution highlights the delicate balance between freedom of expression and the preservation of parliamentary propriety.

In a notable incident from August 2023, BJP MP Nishikant Dubey’s remarks linking Congress, NewsClick, and journalists to China were initially expunged from the parliamentary records. However, this decision was later reversed, sparking controversy and renewing discussions about the application and implications of expunction in contemporary parliamentary debates.

Special Considerations for Allegations Against Ministers

Interestingly, the rules governing expunction make a distinction when it comes to allegations against government ministers. Rule 353 of the Lok Sabha allows for allegations against colleagues or outsiders, provided there is advance notice.

This provision reflects the principle of ministerial accountability to Parliament. It allows MPs to question ministers and make imputations about their conduct as part of their duty to ensure government accountability.

However, this rule does not apply to general allegations against ministers, recognizing the unique position of the Council of Ministers in relation to Parliament.

Recent Controversies

The recent expunctions that sparked controversy involved high-profile opposition leaders. In the Lok Sabha, parts of Rahul Gandhi’s speech criticizing Prime Minister Narendra Modi were expunged by Speaker Om Birla.

Similarly, in the Rajya Sabha, Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar removed significant portions of Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge’s speech, which was critical of the Prime Minister and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS).

These actions led to accusations of selective expunction and raised questions about the consistent application of parliamentary rules across party lines.

The Digital Age Challenge: When Expunction Meets Live Broadcasting
In the era of live television broadcasts and social media, the practice of expunction faces new challenges. While remarks may be removed from official records, they often remain accessible through recordings of live broadcasts and social media shares.

This digital persistence raises questions about the effectiveness and relevance of expunction in modern times. It creates a dichotomy between the official record and the public’s access to information, potentially undermining the very purpose of expunction.

The Way Forward: Balancing Tradition with Modernity

As India’s parliamentary system grapples with these challenges, there are calls for modernization and adaptation. Suggestions include the implementation of advanced monitoring tools that could automatically blur or mute expunged remarks in live broadcasts and recordings.

There is also a growing recognition of the need for public awareness and education about the practice of expunction. This could foster a more informed citizenry and encourage responsible reporting and sharing of parliamentary proceedings.

The Importance of Expunction in Parliamentary Democracy

Despite the challenges and controversies, the practice of expunction continues to play a crucial role in India’s parliamentary democracy. It serves as a safeguard against the misuse of parliamentary privilege and helps maintain the standards of discourse within the legislative chambers.

Expunction ensures that debates remain respectful, relevant, and accurate. It upholds the dignity of the House and its members, contributing to the overall integrity of the parliamentary process.

Striking a Balance: Freedom of Speech vs. Parliamentary Decorum

The ongoing debate surrounding expunction practices highlights the tension between two fundamental principles: the freedom of speech of elected representatives and the need for decorum and dignity in parliamentary proceedings.

Finding the right balance between these principles is crucial for the healthy functioning of India’s democracy. It requires careful consideration of each case, consistent application of rules, and a commitment to transparency.

The Role of Presiding Officers: Guardians of Parliamentary Integrity

The Speaker of the Lok Sabha and the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha bear significant responsibility in this process. Their decisions on expunction can shape the course of parliamentary debate and influence public perception of political discourse.

These presiding officers must exercise their powers judiciously, ensuring that expunction is used as a tool to enhance the quality of debate rather than stifle legitimate criticism or dissent.

The Broader Implications: Transparency and Public Trust

The practice of expunction has broader implications for transparency in governance and public trust in democratic institutions. While it serves to maintain decorum, it also raises questions about the public’s right to know what transpires in the halls of Parliament.

Striking the right balance between maintaining parliamentary standards and ensuring transparency is crucial for preserving public faith in the democratic process.

Shaping the Future of Parliamentary Discourse

As India’s democracy continues to evolve, so too must its parliamentary practices. The recent controversies surrounding expunction have brought this age-old practice into the spotlight, prompting a necessary debate about its place in modern governance.

While expunction remains a valuable tool for maintaining the integrity of parliamentary proceedings, its application in the digital age requires careful consideration and potential adaptation.

The challenge lies in preserving the essence of this practice while ensuring it remains relevant and effective in an era of instant communication and widespread information sharing.

As India moves forward, the practice of expunction will likely continue to be a subject of debate and potential reform. The goal should be to strike a balance that upholds the dignity of Parliament while respecting the principles of transparency and freedom of speech that are fundamental to a thriving democracy.

In the end, the evolution of expunction practices will play a crucial role in shaping the future of India’s parliamentary democracy, influencing how elected representatives engage in debate and how the public perceives and participates in the democratic process.

Jailed Amritpal Singh And Rashid Take Oath As MPs

July 5, 2024, 3:53 pm

Both were elected as Independents in the recent Lok Sabha elections, with Singh incarcerated in Assam’s Dibrugarh prison and Rashid in Delhi’s Tihar jail.

Singh, elected from Khadoor Sahib in Punjab, and Rashid, who won from Baramulla in Jammu and Kashmir, could not take their oaths with other newly elected MPs due to their imprisonment. They were escorted to the Parliament by security personnel and took their oaths in the Lok Sabha speaker’s chamber.

Rashid was granted a two-hour custody parole excluding travel time from Tihar to Parliament, while Amritpal received a four-day custody parole starting July 5 to account for travel from Assam to Delhi and back. Their parole orders specified restrictions on media interactions.

In Delhi, Amritpal was allowed to meet his family, while Rashid’s family could only attend the oath-taking ceremony. Amritpal, head of the ‘Waris Punjab De’ outfit, is detained under the National Security Act for his radical activities. Rashid has been in custody since 2017 for a terror funding case under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.

Authorities ensured strict procedures were followed within the Parliament complex. Rashid’s case involved connections to Kashmiri businessman Zahoor Watali and other prominent separatist figures. Amritpal Singh, who aligns himself with the late Khalistani militant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale, is also held under the National Security Act. The events underscored the contentious issues surrounding their criminal charges and political roles.