Latest Iran Israel Tensions News | Top Iran Israel Tensions News Headlines Today | Today India news | Breaking Iran Israel Tensions News Today | English Iran Israel Tensions News Headlines - TheDailyGuardian

Ayatollah Khamenei Returns After 12 Days: Health Scare or Hidden Strategy?

July 6, 2025, 11:28 am

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei emerged publicly for the first time on July 5, days after a bitter 12-day conflict with Israel. Khamenei appeared wearing black mourning attire, smiling and waving at crowds at Tehran’s Imam Khomeini Mosque during a Shia religious ritual. Following weeks of public disappearance that stoked intense speculation about his safety and well-being, he made a brief return.

One of the most direct conflicts between the two adversaries in decades, the war broke out on June 13 after Israel launched surprise airstrikes on Iranian military and nuclear facilities. Khamenei’s low profile during the conflict raised global attention, and reports hinted he may have been hiding in a secure underground bunker. His reappearance now appears aimed at signaling strength, unity, and control.

Where was Khamenei during the war?

Ayatollah Khamenei disappeared from public sight on June 11, when he met with Iranian Parliament members for the last time. Two days thereafter, Israel attacked important Iranian installations, initiating a military operation which lasted about two weeks. During this period, Khamenei shunned all public appearances as well as electronic communications. His sole communication was a pre-recorded video message released last week.

Reports indicated that the Supreme Leader had been transferred to an extremely secure underground complex to prevent possible attempts on his life. With increased threats from Israel and subsequent interference by the United States, Iran probably took drastic security precautions to secure its 86-year-old leader.

Health fears grow amid silence

Khamenei’s prolonged absence stoked intense rumors about his health. His archive chief, Mehdi Fazaeli, gave a vague response when asked directly about it during an interview with The New York Times.

He said, “We all should be praying,” and reassured viewers that his protection team was doing its job. His cryptic answer only deepened public unease. Many Iranians worried whether their Supreme Leader was seriously ill or worse.

Public return signals political intent

Khamenei’s return on Saturday came with chants from the crowd, “The blood in our veins for our leader!” His appearance—physically steady and smiling—seemed carefully staged to restore public confidence. It conveyed the message that, in spite of the recent conflict and internal succession concerns, Iran’s leadership is still in place.

Iran hopes to show stability by resurfacing at this time. Khamenei’s strategic return aims to dispel any doubts that had grown while he was away. However, his quiet during the conflict’s peak is still a notable instance in Iran’s history as a leader.

US Strikes Set Back Iran’s Nuclear Programme by Up to Two Years: Pentagon

July 3, 2025, 4:24 pm

The Pentagon officially stated that US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities pushed back its programme by one to two years. The announcement is in line with President Donald Trump’s assertion that the attacks “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear industry.

Trump ordered the bombing of three of Iran’s most important nuclear facilities in a 12-day war in which Israel and the US attacked Iran. Although the extent of the damage is contested, US officials argue the operation imposed substantial delays.

Pentagon Echoes Trump’s Claims

The Pentagon referred to the strikes as a “bold operation” and said Iran’s program had been “set back by one to two years at least.” Trump had previously asserted that the nuclear program was “obliterated like nobody’s ever seen before.” Trump firmly rejected claims that downgraded the extent of damage.

A previous leaked US intelligence assessment had indicated the effect was minimal—only pushing Iran’s advance back months. But Parnell’s statements now are consistent with Trump’s account.

Iran reacts with Secrecy and Denials

Iran has been evasive on how extensive the damage was. Officials acknowledged some of the locations were severely damaged. But Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei accused President Trump of overstating the effects of the bombing.

Iran has not let international inspectors on the ground at the sites affected. Its parliament recently approved a law to suspend cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, the IAEA. The government charged that the agency had transferred secret information to Israel—an assertion the IAEA rejected.

IAEA Left in the Dark

IAEA head Rafael Grossi assured that the agency had lost control. Grossi said Iran would be able to resume uranium enrichment “a matter of months” from now. Satellite imagery indicated trucks departing the Fordow site prior to the attacks, which raised questions regarding the whereabouts of Iran’s enriched uranium.

Grossi further explained that certain stockpiles of uranium could have been damaged or relocated. There were no radiation spikes observed, however. The situation remains unclear.

US, Israel Declare Victory, Iran Disagrees

Israel initiated the initial attack on June 13, describing it as preemptive. Iran fired missiles back, taking out 29 in Israel. Ten days into the conflict, the US entered the fray. Iran fired a missile at a US base in Qatar. The assault resulted in no casualties.

Trump then declared a ceasefire, proclaiming a “historic victory.” Israel said it had destroyed Iran’s nuclear facilities, but Tehran contended it had preserved essential infrastructure and military might.

With Iran’s nuclear programme now out of international sight, its long-term effect is unclear. But for the time being, Washington thinks that it has gained time.

US Proposes B-2 Bomber & Bunker Buster Transfer to Israel To Counter Iran Nukes

July 3, 2025, 12:55 pm

Amid new nuclear tensions between the US and Iran and rising missile threats from Yemen, US lawmakers have proposed authorizing President Donald Trump to send B-2 stealth bombers and 30,000-pound “bunker buster” bombs to Israel. They made this move just days after the US used 14 B-2-deployed bombs to strike three Iranian nuclear facilities—Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan.

The proposed legislation, known as the Bunker Buster Act, would give the US President the power to supply Israel with cutting-edge military equipment if Iran continues developing nuclear weapons.

Bunker Buster Act Makes Progress

Members Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) and Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) sponsored the bill, which they said was necessary to help protect Israel from Iranian nuclear aspirations. The lawmakers stated that the US must never allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon. They supported previous US attacks on Iran and explained that Israel has the right to self-defense.

“Iran has murdered dozens of Americans, including our warriors, and repeatedly attacked Israel,” Gottheimer explained. “This legislation authorizes the President to arm Israel with the capabilities and training that they require to deter Iran and make the world a safer place,” Lawler said.

While the US now has 19 B-2 bombers at its disposal, it has never relinquished control of these stealth planes to an ally. This has thus stirred eyebrows worldwide.

Israel and US Officials Suggest Strikes on Yemen

The offer came after US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee hinted that B-2 bombers might strike Yemen as well. His statement was made following the Houthis’ missile attack on Israel. “Perhaps those B-2 bombers need to stop by Yemen,” Huckabee tweeted on X.

Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz also shared similar sentiments. “The fate of Tehran is the same as that of Yemen,” Katz threatened. He further said, “Whoever raises a hand against Israel — that hand will be cut off.”

Iran Halts Cooperation with Nuclear Watchdog

The bill comes also as Iran suspended cooperation with the UN nuclear agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has signed into law a bill ending all cooperation, which frozen inspections and international monitoring.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi criticised IAEA chief Rafael Grossi and questioned the intent behind his request to inspect the bombed sites. “Grossi’s insistence is possibly malign in intent,” he claimed. Pezeshkian told French President Emmanuel Macron that Iran suspended cooperation due to the IAEA’s “destructive behaviour.”

Regional Conflict Escalates as Ceasefire Holds

Tensions between the two nations had boiled over just a week prior. Israel preemptively struck Iran’s nuclear facilities. Iran counterattacked against a US military base located in Qatar. A ceasefire resulted after more than a week of overt hostilities between Iran and Israel. Although both nations disengaged, members of Congress in Washington seem eager to provide Israel with still more weaponry to prepare for what may come next.

With Iran suspending international monitoring and the Houthis escalating cross-border violence, the region is on tenterhooks. The proposed Bunker Buster Act represents a new direction for US policy, one that would deepen its military involvement in the Middle East.

Iran Suspends Ties with IAEA Days After US Bombs Nuclear Sites

July 2, 2025, 3:07 pm

Iran suspended all co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) just days after a US military attack aimed at its main nuclear facilities. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian sanctioned the suspension via an official law on Wednesday, state television reported. The decision comes after widespread destruction of Iran’s atomic apparatus and increasing anger with what Iran regards as the world’s silence, particularly from the IAEA.

The suspension follows Pezeshkian denouncing IAEA Chief Rafael Grossi for not denouncing the attacks by Israel and the United States as blatant breaches of the UN Charter and NPT.

Iran Questions the Value of Cooperation

In a telephone conversation with his French counterpart, Pezeshkian doubted further cooperation. “What assurance is there that our installations will not be attacked again, even if we cooperate?” he asked. The Iranian president also doubted the credibility of the UN nuclear watchdog in safeguarding Iran’s sovereign rights.

Grossi, though, turned down Iran’s suspension. He cautioned that Tehran would be able to resume uranium enrichment within months, even though the attacks caused huge damage. “They can have, you know, in a matter of months, a few cascades of centrifuges rotating and making enriched uranium—or less than that,” he said to CBS News.

Fordow Site Suffers Heavy Damage

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi admitted that the US attack severely damaged the Fordow nuclear facility. “No one precisely knows what has happened at Fordow. And anyway, what we know until now is that the facilities have been seriously and heavily damaged,” he conceded in an interview with CBS.

Iran, US Messages Seem to Clash

At the same time, a story in the Washington Post, quoting four people briefed on secret US intelligence, said that intercepted Iranian communications seemed to minimize the degree of the damage. This discrepancy calls into question how much Iran wants to disclose—and how much it wants to hide—about the true status of its nuclear program.

For now, the standoff between Tehran, Washington, and the IAEA deepens, raising global concerns about nuclear escalation, accountability, and the future of non-proliferation diplomacy.

Trump Revives Israel-Hamas Ceasefire Proposal, Seeks Hostage Release

June 30, 2025, 6:08 pm

US President Donald Trump has re-ignited plans for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, with the aim of obtaining the release of remaining hostages. This follows his previous success at negotiating a ceasefire in the Israel-Iran conflict. Trump’s action follows the breakdown of a January ceasefire agreement, renewed Israeli attacks, and an increasing number of civilian deaths in Gaza.

Meanwhile, his government is still in controversy for promoting a plan to assume control of Gaza and make it a resort city, essentially closing the two-state solution.

Talks Back on Track After Months of Collapse

The January ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas collapsed in March. Since then, PM Benjamin Netanyahu summoned a resumption of Israeli action in Gaza. Thousands of Palestinians have been killed since then, many while congregating for humanitarian relief.

The backchannel negotiations have been revived by Trump’s team, The Jerusalem Post reports. The negotiations seek to restore the ceasefire and complete the release of hostages held during the October 7 terror attacks. A US senior official asserted that the administration remains “optimistic” about closing the deal.

75% of Deal Finalised, 25% Still in Dispute

An American source indicated that 75% of the terms of the agreement are now resolved. The remaining 25% consists of such issues as:

Humanitarian terms in Gaza
Conclusive terms to bring an end to war
Israel’s request for assurances to preclude Hamas from rearming

These points of contention remain to hold up progress. Nevertheless, both sides are said to remain involved in indirect negotiations.

Exile Proposal Sparks Tension

One of the important proposals is the banishment of Hamas leaders from Gaza after a ceasefire is established. Trump administration officials have championed the notion, but Hamas has dismissed it.

In the meantime, PM Netanyahu met with top ministers and military brass on Sunday. Israel discussed whether to send a team to indirect negotiations in Qatar or Egypt, The Jerusalem Post reported. It is a possible change of pace in Israeli participation, despite ongoing combat.

Trump’s Gaza Plan Remains a Flashpoint

While Trump says he wants peace, his Gaza rebuilding scheme scares people. He has suggested that Palestinians be expelled and Gaza be turned into an Israeli-run resort area. His critics label the plan ethnic cleansing and say it would ensure that the two-state solution is never possible again.

Nonetheless, Trump still courts the image of a dealmaker who can resolve conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine. However, during his reign, a new war with Iran erupted instead.

Donald Trump’s second push for a ceasefire comes during record-breaking violence, international criticism, and profound disagreement over what the future holds for Gaza. As hostage negotiations continue and most of the agreement is already on the table, the next several weeks may determine whether Gaza witnesses a respite—or further devastation.

Iran May Restart Uranium Enrichment Soon Despite US-Israel Strikes: IAEA Chief

June 29, 2025, 2:34 pm

Iran could restart uranium enrichment in a matter of months, its top nuclear watchdog warned, despite a recent wave of US and Israeli assaults on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Key facilities were left intact, and Iran could soon spin centrifuges and restart making enriched uranium, which adds to the urgency of the nuclear discussion worldwide.

Rafael Grossi was also concerned that Iran has a stockpile of 60 percent enriched uranium, below weapons grade. He mentioned that the current stockpile could provide enough material for more than nine nuclear bombs if further enriched. These facts are raising red flags on Iran’s capabilities and intentions as tensions in the region increase.

Grossi Flags Critical Gaps in Oversight

The head of the IAEA acknowledged the agency can’t confirm the level of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile. He added that it is not clear whether Tehran relocated the stockpile ahead of the bombings or destroyed part of it. “There has to be, at some point, a clarification,” Grossi insisted.

He stressed that the IAEA does not now have access to visit nuclear facilities, including the well-guarded Fordow underground facility. Iranian parliamentarians suspended recent cooperation with the agency, increasing worries about transparency.

Israel and US Launched Coordinated Assaults

The Israeli military launched its attack on June 13 against Iran’s military and nuclear facilities. The US followed a few days later, striking three of Iran’s nuclear facilities. President Donald Trump asserted these attacks had delayed Iran’s nuclear program “by decades.”

That assurance is contrary to the statement of Grossi. Some infrastructure is still standing, he said, and Iran could begin production again “within a matter of months,” if not earlier.

Civilian Death Toll Mounts Amid Conflict

Consequences of the attacks have been catastrophic. Iran’s Ministry of Health documented 627 civilian fatalities during the 12-day attack. The Iranian retaliation resulted in the deaths of 28 individuals in Israel, officials there reported.

On Saturday, the judiciary in Iran reported a fatal missile strike against Tehran’s Evin Prison. The attack took 71 lives, including detainees, visitors, and military recruits.

Rising Risk and Shrinking Clarity

With oversight suspended and enriched uranium potentially still intact, global concerns over Iran’s nuclear future are growing. Grossi stressed the need for urgent re-engagement. But Iran’s refusal to grant access, paired with the damage from airstrikes, leaves the world with more questions than answers.

Israel and the US may have intended to halt Iran’s nuclear ambitions. But Grossi’s warning shows the threat could re-emerge—and soon.

GHF Denies Gaza Aid Deaths, Defends Operation as IDF Faces War Crimes Probe

June 28, 2025, 5:29 pm

US and Israel-supported Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) denied blame for the recent Palestinian fatalities close to its aid centers. There have been hundreds of deaths in recent weeks among children collecting food in Gaza. But GHF leader Johnnie Moore debunked allegations that the fatalities were close to GHF locations. He accused international agencies, including the UN, of circulating what he described as unverified information.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) meanwhile have opened an inquiry within their ranks following allegations soldiers were instructed to shoot at civilians congregating at relief centers.

GHF Chief Dismisses Criticism

In an interview with the BBC, GHF chief Johnnie Moore came to the defense of the organization being in Gaza. He conceded that Gazans did perish but challenged the assertion that “100 per cent” of victims were caused by close proximity to GHF centers.

“We spend a great amount of time trying to figure out what really occurred, if anything really did occur,” Moore stated. He maintained there is “no evidence” that individuals were killed while making their way to GHF-run locations.

Johnnie Moore also charged international agencies with spreading misinformation, specifically regarding the security of civilians traveling to GHF distribution centers.

Deaths Mount as Hunger Crisis Deepens

As Israel’s blockade of Gaza persists, thousands have swarmed food centers to survive. Accounts from Gaza cite hundreds of civilians who have been killed attempting to fetch aid, with numerous others near GHF centers.

Aid workers in the field and eyewitnesses have testified to stampedes, and, in a few instances, open fire. GHF disputes these deaths taking place near its locations, but independent reports continue to provide grave concerns.

IDF Probes Potential War Crimes

In a stunning twist, the IDF has opened an investigation into whether Israeli troops systematically shot Palestinian civilians at aid facilities. The probe follows unnamed statements provided to Israeli newspaper Haaretz.

Troops said they were instructed to shoot close to individuals picking up food in order to keep them at bay from Israeli forces. Some conceded to having felt uncomfortable with opening fire at unarmed civilians.

Israeli Government, IDF Shun Allegations

Despite the affidavits, the Israeli army has also denied any misdeed. It said, “IDF orders forbid intentional attacks on civilians.” Even Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Israel Katz rejected the Haaretz report. Together, they referred to the report as “malicious falsehoods aimed at smearing the IDF, the world’s most moral military.”

Yet the backlash from both the GHF denials and the IDF investigation has provoked widespread outrage. As hunger increases, cries for responsibility are only mounting.

‘Run to Daddy Trump’, Iran Mocks Israel, Demands Respect for Khamenei

June 28, 2025, 1:40 pm

Iran escalated its rhetoric this week, taunting Israel for needing to “run to Daddy” — a reference to US President Donald Trump’s moniker — in order to escape missile retaliation. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi made the biting comments shortly after a ceasefire between Israel and Iran had come into force. Iran issued a strongly worded threat to the United States, demanding it stop insulting the Supreme Leader if it wants a nuclear accord.

The back-and-forth has brought the already volatile Middle East closer to the precipice, with Tehran warning it will unveil its “true capabilities” if pushed further. Trump, in turn, boasted that he spared Iran’s top leader his life, further fanning animosity.

Missile Warning and Mockery of Iran

Tehran’s Foreign Minister Araqchi also targeted Tel Aviv, stating that Israel had no option but to “run to Daddy” to save itself from Iran’s missile capabilities. He referred to the Iranian nation as “great and powerful” and stated that their reaction made Israel turn to the United States for protection.

The complexity and tenacity of Iranians is famously known in our magnificent carpets, woven through countless hours of hard work and patience. But as a people, our basic premise is very simple and straightforward: we know our worth, value our independence, and never allow anyone…

— Seyed Abbas Araghchi (@araghchi) June 27, 2025

“If fantasies result in worse errors, Iran won’t hesitate to reveal its true capabilities,” Araqchi declared, leaving no doubt that the truce is tenuous. He emphasized that the world must not underestimate Iran’s military power and cautioned Tel Aviv against making “delusional” choices.

Trump’s ‘Daddy’ Nickname Goes Global

Secretary-General Mark Rutte playfully called Trump “Daddy” during the NATO conference in The Netherlands, setting the stage for the insult. Rutte responded to Trump’s on-air utterance of the F-word as a way of expressing annoyance at the continuation of missile exchanges between Israel and Iran despite the ceasefire.

Iran quickly transformed the nickname into diplomatic sarcasm. Araqchi ridiculed Israel for surviving on “Daddy Trump.”.

Iran Slams Trump Over Ayatollah Remarks

In a different statement, Araqchi also called on Trump to refrain from employing what he described as a “disrespectful and unacceptable tone” towards Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei.

“If President Trump is serious about making a deal, he should refrain from offending millions of sincere fans of the Supreme Leader,” Araqchi said.

His statements came in response to an incendiary tweet by Trump, who boasted that he had spared Ayatollah Khamenei from being assassinated by US or Israeli forces. “I knew exactly where he was being protected,” Trump stated, “but I did not let anyone end his life.”

Nuclear Talks Off the Table

Trump also indicated he had contemplated easing sanctions against Iran. But he said Iran’s outraged response made him drop plans to do so.

“I’m struck by anger, hatred, and revulsion,” Trump tweeted, “so I put all work on sanction relief on hold.”

Contrary to Trump’s assertions, Iran has dismissed any possibility that nuclear negotiations will reopen next week. Tehran has firmly stated that it has not scheduled any talks with Washington.

Operation Narnia: Israel’s Strike That Crushed Iran’s Top Command

June 27, 2025, 4:07 pm

In the middle of the night of June 13, Israel made a brazen military assault deep within Iran—an operation it once feared was impossible to carry out. Code-named Operation Narnia, the synchronized attack involved years of planning, intelligence amassing, and rigorous pilot training.

The highlight of the attack was Israel’s precision strike on Tehran, which Israeli forces referred to as “Red Wedding”—a haunting nod to the violent ambush scene in the TV show Game of Thrones. By the time it was over, Israel had assassinated several of Iran’s most senior military leaders in a shock to the region.

Years in the Making

Israeli air force and intelligence officials had been training for this moment for decades. Pilots worked hard to manage long-distance missions. Spies constructed clandestine networks across international boundaries. The mission required complete secrecy and impeccable timing. A leak as small as a whisper could have spell doom for the mission.

‘Red Wedding’: The Tehran Strike

At midnight, the Israeli military’s highest-ranking generals gathered in a bunker under air force headquarters. From there, they observed Israeli warplanes dive down upon Tehran. The precise stage—”Red Wedding”—aimed at Iran’s high command echelon. Within a few hours, more than 1,000 miles away from Israeli territory, Iran’s highest-ranking military brass were dead.

The operation delivered accuracy that mirrored the fantasy massacre it was named after. Even after years of preparations, the final implementation almost fell apart. Israel used devious deceptions to achieve surprise. Just at the last minute, a wild card attacked the timing of the mission. Still, the cover held. The planes attacked before Iran was able to respond.

Devastation in Iran

Photos from Iranian media indicated clouds of smoke rising above Tehran. A satellite image showed destruction at Iran’s Ghadir facility. Iran set up memorials for the commanders who were killed. Iran’s defenses did not expect the magnitude and coordination of Israel’s attack.

Long Road from Warnings to Action

Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu had been warning the world for decades. Already in 1996, he spoke to the US Congress of the threat of a nuclear Iran. Now, in 2025, he sat and watched as Israel launched one of its most daring attacks in recent history.

The raid not just undermined Iran’s military command but also reshaped Israel’s hidden extension. Operation Narnia demonstrated that with time, training, and accuracy, even the most protected adversaries are exposed.

Missile Sirens in Israel: Did Iran Break the Ceasefire Hours In?

June 24, 2025, 5:59 pm

Only hours after US President Donald Trump announced that the Iran-Israel ceasefire had come into effect, sirens blared throughout northern Israel. Iran had fired ballistic missiles, said Israeli officials, who feared the fragile ceasefire had broken down. Social media images of missiles heading over Jordan fueled speculation.

But Iranian state television rejected such claims, describing reports of a post-ceasefire attack as “false.” Mistrust increased as the leaders on both sides made conflicting statements, with Trump previously celebrating the ceasefire as an instance of “peace,” while Israeli defence officials threatened retaliation.

Trump Warned Against Ceasefire Breach

President Trump declared the ceasefire in sensational terms, asserting that both sides had pressured him to act. He stated that “it is time for peace,” addressing the people of the Middle East as the “real winners.” Trump commended “RIGHTEOUSNESS & TRUTH” and stated that the future of Iran and Israel was bright.

Trump warned all sides against breaching the agreement as well. He presented the truce as a demonstration of “peace through strength” following fierce US intervention, including Iranian attacks on nuclear facilities.

Alarms in Israel, Denials in Tehran

Sirens blared in northern Israel mere hours after the ceasefire was to go into effect. Israel said Iran launched a new ballistic missile, which activated quick security warnings. But Iranian media rejected the claims. Citing Iran’s general staff, state TV reported that no missile had been fired since the ceasefire went into effect.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi previously stated operations to “punish Israel” persisted until 4 am—the very moment the ceasefire was set to start.

Israel Claims Iran Violated the Truce

Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz stated that Iran had “fully violated” the ceasefire. He instructed the military to restart attacks on Iranian governmental and military sites. IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir stated they would “smite with force” after Iran’s “serious violation.”

Escalation in Qatar Exacerbates Tensions

Meanwhile, Qatar summoned Iran’s ambassador after Iranian forces targeted a major US military base on Qatari soil. That strike came in retaliation for earlier U.S. bombings on Iran’s key nuclear sites—Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan—executed by B-2 bombers.

These US attacks were part of Operation Rising Lion, during which Israeli forces also targeted Iran’s nuclear and military infrastructure, killing top officials.

War or Misinformation?

Iranian media, such as the Tasnim News Agency, had castigated Israel’s allegations as psychological warfare to create a gap between military strategy and diplomacy. But missile sirens, coupled with Israeli allegations and Iran’s previous assertions, continue to generate doubt about whether the ceasefire ever really started.

In spite of Trump’s declaration, the Iran-Israel ceasefire is now at stake. Amid Tehran’s ambiguous signals and Israeli threats, West Asia is at the risk of new escalation—just when peace had come within sight.

Israel Hits Iran After Alleged Truce Violation: Ceasefire or Illusion?

June 24, 2025, 3:47 pm

Conflicts between Israel and Iran escalated again mere hours after US President Donald Trump declared a phased 24-hour ceasefire process. Israel accepted the proposal, but later blamed Iran for breaching the truce by firing missiles. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz retaliated with strong attacks on regime forces within Tehran.

However, Iran denied firing any new missiles and blamed Israel for being compelled to stop aggression. As both sides traded accusations, the future of the ceasefire remained uncertain. This fragile truce now risks collapsing before it even takes hold.

Trump’s Ceasefire Proposal: A Fragile Start

US President Donald Trump declared a phased ceasefire to start from around 04:00 GMT on Tuesday. Israel made the terms public. While Iran did not initially accept the agreement, its Supreme National Security Council issued a statement later indicating that it now supported the ceasefire.

The arrangement entailed a trial phase where each side would practice restraint before committing to an extended accord.

Israel’s Accusation and Retaliation

However, this was proposed even as Israel charged that Iran fired new missile attacks shortly after the ceasefire took hold. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz indicated that he had instructed the military to retaliate “forcefully” against what he termed an obvious breach.

Israel confirmed that it bombed regime positions in “the heart of Tehran.” Israeli media labeled this initial stage of the ceasefire as a “test period” which would last until 7 p.m. local time. If Iran stood by during that window of opportunity, Israel intended to extend the ceasefire.

Iran’s Denial and Defiant Stance

Iran hastened to deny Israel’s allegations. State media reported that Iran’s general staff did not fire any missiles “in the last few hours” against Israeli soil. Iran’s Supreme National Security Council said that Iran’s previous military operations forced Israel to stop firing unilaterally. Tehran referred to this turn of events as a “divine gift” and a “victory.”

The council further noted that Iranian forces were “on high alert,” poised to give a “decisive and regret-inducing response” to another act of aggression.

A Ceasefire Hanging by a Thread

Though Trump’s ceasefire proposal had provided a temporary lull, the situation today balances on the brink. Israel’s rapid counterattack and Iran’s denial indicate the profound mistrust. Both being entrenched in contradicting accounts, the road to a lasting peace seems bleak.

In the meantime, war and diplomacy run parallel—on the brink of collapse one missile away.

Iran Israel Ceasefire Confusion Grows After Trump’s Peace Declaration: Truce or Trap?

June 24, 2025, 2:55 pm

US President Donald Trump on June 24 confirmed a ceasefire between Israel and Iran is in place. The truce came after 12 days of intense fighting, triggered by US-Israeli joint attacks on Iranian nuclear installations. Trump described the ceasefire as a turning point and promised West Asia a future of peace. But uncertainty hangs over the deal.

Iran’s Foreign Minister initially denied any formal ceasefire, then praised Iran’s forces for resisting until the last moment. This contradiction raises doubts over whether hostilities have truly ended or simply paused.

Trump Declares ‘Peace Through Strength’

President Trump took to Truth Social to announce the ceasefire. He said both Israel and Iran had urged him to end the war. Referring to the people of the Middle East as the “real winners,” he proclaimed “it is time for peace.”

Trump stated that the war could have raged on for years and ruined the entire region. He labeled the ceasefire a victory of “RIGHTEOUSNESS & TRUTH.” After his post, he patted himself on the back for ending what he described as an epochal conflict.

Tehran’s Denial Deepens Doubts

Shortly after Trump’s statement, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi rebutted the assertion. There was no official ceasefire or mutual understanding to suspend military campaigns, he stated.

But a minute later, he thanked Iran’s Armed Forces for resisting aggression “until the very last minute.” This ambiguous message from Tehran has set off confusion among diplomatic and media circles.

Strikes That Preceded the Ceasefire

The ceasefire declaration occurred only hours after a huge escalation. Iran launched missiles against an American base in Qatar in response to previous US airstrikes. The US had bombed three nuclear sites—Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan—with B-2 bombers. These bombings were a response to Israel’s Operation Rising Lion, a campaign against Iran’s nuclear facilities and the deaths of some important Iranian military and nuclear personalities.

The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) attested to the US attacks having been conducted in collaboration with them. Israeli authorities referred to the bombings as a “crucial step” to halt Iran’s aggressive campaign in the region.

While both Israeli and Iranian media conveyed that the ceasefire was on, the ambiguity of Iranian government’s statements has left the situation in doubt. Trump maintains the truce exists and cautioned that no party should breach it. Yet, without a signed agreement and with no unambiguous terms made public, most are apprehensive that the agreement might be unfirm or even transient.

Uncertain Peace in a Volatile Region

The ceasefire has provided temporary relief, but the uncertainty fuels alarm. Tehran’s duplicitous position indicates domestic divisions or strategic ambiguity. Hitherto, military action has ceased. But enduring peace will rely on tangible diplomacy, reciprocal restraint, and enforcement of this de facto accord.

Trump might have claimed victory in the war, but with no clarity from Tehran, the ceasefire is tenuous. Peace in West Asia’s turbulent terrain requires more than proclamations—it requires commitment.

How Did Qatar Go From Power Broker to Missile Target in Iran-Israel Conflict?

June 24, 2025, 2:35 pm

Qatar’s traditional position as a Middle East conflict mediator was put to the test after an Iranian missile attack on a US military base in Qatar on June 24. The base, Al Udeid Air Base, is home to the forward headquarters of US Central Command. Iran’s attack was preceded by President Donald Trump’s announcement of a ceasefire between Iran and Israel.

The bombing, set in motion by Israeli and American bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, has abruptly plunged Qatar into the thick of the war. The small Gulf state was said to have brokered the ceasefire. But its status as regional power broker is now called into question.

For decades, Qatar has employed diplomacy, the media, and military alliances to punch well above its weight. But as this strike illustrates, mediators’ status does not protect Qatar from the consequences of wars it attempts to broker.

Where Is Qatar—and Why Does It Matter?

Qatar is a small but rich nation on the Arabian Peninsula’s northeast coast. It borders Saudi Arabia on its single border. Qatar is smaller than the American state of Connecticut at slightly more than 11,500 square kilometres. Yet the country is among the wealthiest per capita due to its riches from liquefied natural gas exports.

Despite its size, Qatar hosts a large population—over 3.1 million. Nearly 88% of them are foreigners, mostly Indian nationals. Indians alone make up nearly 22% of the population, working across all sectors from healthcare to construction.

How Qatar Became a Regional Powerbroker?

Qatar’s influence rose under former Emir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani. The turning point came in 1996 when the US established the Al Udeid Air Base.

Under Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani as the current one, Qatar has brokered some of the region’s conflicts. It was instrumental in the negotiations between the US and the Taliban, resulting in America’s withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. It has also brokered prisoner exchanges in the war between Russia and Ukraine.

Qatar has continually assisted in brokering talks between Israel and Hamas, particularly following the October 2023 attack. Doha was the host of Hamas’s political bureau for years. It also assisted in facilitating the release of Israeli hostages who were brought to Gaza. In addition to these, Qatar has brokered mediation in Lebanon, Yemen, Iraq, and Sudan.

Qatar’s Increasing Influence Came with a Price

Qatar’s increased influence had repercussions. Bigger neighbors such as Saudi Arabia and the UAE started viewing Qatar as a competitor. Its backing of the Arab Spring, such as supporting Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, infuriated Gulf monarchies.

This is what precipitated a 2017 diplomatic crisis. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, and Bahrain severed relations and slapped a complete boycott. They accused Qatar of sponsoring terrorism and intervening in regional affairs. The boycott continued until 2021. Qatar’s sole land border with Saudi Arabia was shut down, and imports of vital items were blocked.

Al Jazeera: Qatar’s Voice—and a Flashpoint

In 1996, Qatar introduced Al Jazeera, an influential media instrument that extended international reach. Al Jazeera English followed in 2006. The channel became popular for amplifying opposition forces, particularly during the Arab Spring.

But this also put Qatar in the crosshairs. Critics accused the country of employing the media platform to advance regime change and amplify U.S. intelligence narratives. Qatar’s relationships with Iran and its outspoken positions pitted it against other Gulf states.

Iran Strike: A New Reality for Qatar

The missile attack in June 24 was the first time that Qatar was directly targeted during a regional conflict. It’s a turning point. Hosting American troops is no longer immune from attack. As Iran retaliates against American and Israeli aggression, even a neutral agent such as Qatar can be targeted.

Qatar’s approach of influence-through-mediation served it well to survive in a tumultuous region. But the latest attack could compel Doha to re-examine how it manages to juggle diplomacy, security, and survival.

Israel-Iran Ceasefire Begins After US Strikes, Tel Aviv Warns of Retaliation

June 24, 2025, 1:51 pm

Israel and Iran on June 24, 2025, agreed to a ceasefire facilitated by US President Donald Trump. According to Israel, it “achieved all objectives” in the conflict. It claimed it eliminated the “dual existential threat” that Iran’s nuclear programme and ballistic missile capability represented.

Israel further cautioned that any ceasefire breach would invite a forceful response. This deal comes after 12 days of fierce fighting, after the US had bombed three Iranian nuclear facilities (Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan) and Iran had fired missile attacks–including on a US base in Qatar.

US Brokered Ceasefire After 12 Day War

President Trump declared what he referred to as a “complete and total ceasefire” following almost two weeks of mounting tensions. Israeli and American forces attacked Iran’s nuclear sites at its nuclear and missile programs. Iran hit back with missile salvoes against Israel and at least one US facility in Qatar.

In a statement issued by PM Netanyahu’s office, Israel reported that it had reached its war objectives: crippling Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities, weakening its military command and control, and taking control of Tehran’s airspace. It described this as eliminating the “dual existential threat” presented by Iran.

Warning Against Any Infringements

The Israeli cabinet warned Iran that its violation of the ceasefire would be met with a robust military response. Netanyahu underlined this as a threat and a guarantee for national security.

On June 24, on the eve of the deadline for the ceasefire, Iran fired its final missile salvo that murdered at least four civilians in Beersheba. Israel made final air raids on Iranian facilities, including within Gilan province, before the truce set in.

Global Response And Future Moves

World markets responded favorably: oil and gold prices declined, stock markets went up in expectation of de-escalation. German, Qatari, and U.S. diplomats welcomed the ceasefire, although international analysts are still wary. Iran’s parliament voted to suspend cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog in protest.

Fragile Peace Ahead

Even with the ceasefire, both countries are on high alert. Israel is prepared to retaliate against any breaches. Iran’s official position is still unclear—Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reported Iran would stop if Israel completed its attacks by 4 am Tehran time. Enforcement, timing, and whether the lull could cement deeper diplomatic lines—or prove just a temporary peace—are all questions that hang in the air.

Israel has embraced the US-brokered ceasefire with Iran after achieving its primary military objectives. It now must strive to maintain this ceasefire—and deter its violations—within an environment of deep mistrust and a volatile Middle East.

Putin Plays Both Sides Between Tehran and Trump as Airstrikes Escalate

June 24, 2025, 1:36 pm

Russian President Vladimir Putin is treading a tightrope in the growing Iran-Israel confrontation. At the beginning of the year, he hosted Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian at the Kremlin and signed a strategic partnership to further deepen relations. That agreement sought to strengthen both nations’ efforts to undermine US-dominated world hegemony.

But now, following more than a week of Israeli and American bombing of Iranian targets, Moscow has given Tehran little more than fine words. Putin has refused to offer military assistance, instead urging diplomacy and defusing the crisis.

The Kremlin appears more concerned with maintaining flexibility than with insisting on standing shoulder-to-shoulder with its so-called ally.

Grand Partnership on Paper

Early this year, Putin and Pezeshkian signed a so-called new “strategic partnership” deal. The deal symbolized the intensification of cooperation between Russia and Iran. For years, both countries had stood together to confront Western influence in the Middle East and the world at large.

The Moscow signing seemed symbolic—a move toward solidifying an anti-US bloc. But now that symbolism is at risk. Tehran hoped for backing when its confrontation with Israel escalated. It received little more than diplomatic bluster.

Moscow Delivers Rhetoric, Not Missiles

As Israeli and American aircraft rained down on Iranian targets, Moscow remained largely silent. Putin eschewed explicit military involvement. In public statements, he dodged assurances of action. Instead, he proposed an exchange on the resolution of the crisis.

“This gives us an opportunity to…think together about how it would be possible to exit from this situation,” said Putin. That imprecise remark underscored his delicate dance—to avoid offending either side.

Putin’s Gambit: Stalling and Diplomacy

Instead of deepening engagement, the Kremlin is stalling. Putin is aware that explicit support for Iran invites Israeli reprisal and Western criticism. On the other hand, withdrawing would compromise Russia’s leadership of an emerging multipolar world. By providing words instead of armor, Putin has options open. Tehran, however, now realizes the boundaries of Moscow’s assurances.

With the crisis prolonging, Iran might reconsider depending on Russia. The strategic alliance, once described as historic, now appears superficial. Putin’s true intention appears obvious—safeguard Russian interests above all else, even at the expense of allowing a friendly nation to stand alone against airstrikes.

Israeli Airstrikes Kill 10 IRGC Members in Central Iran, Reports Say

June 23, 2025, 2:59 pm

Israeli strikes in Iran’s central province of Yazd killed as many as 10 members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Sunday, Tasnim and APA said. The attacks injured others and represented a major escalation of the Israel-Iran war, now further complicated by US military involvement. Israel has killed dozens of Iranian commanders and nuclear scientists since June 13, ratcheting pressure on Iran’s military.

Early Sunday morning, Israeli planes attacked two IRGC facilities in Yazd. The Al Ghadir IRGC unit verified seven IRGC members and two conscripts were killed, with one injured. 10 fatalities were reported as the reports came into clarity. Officials did not mention site names or the impact on civilians.

Greater Military Loss Since June 13

Because Israel’s “Operation Rising Lion” started on June 13, it has focused on Iran’s nuclear and military strength. Reports indicate the campaign killed a minimum of six senior IRGC generals, including Hossein Salami and Amir Ali Hajizadeh.

Abductions involved nuclear scientists such as Ahmadreza Zolfaghari and others. Joint Israeli and American airstrikes at Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan have undermined Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.

US Involvement Raises Stakes

US bunker-busting air strikes added to Israel’s offensive, prompting Iran to issue a declaration of war. More than 50% of Iranian missile launchers are currently shut down, according to officials. Analysts observe the campaign succeeded on strategic objectives but run risks of escalated conflict.

What Experts Are Saying?

FT writes that Israel and the US seek to eliminate Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities, although US officials shy away from stating complete dismantling. A Washington Post editorial cautions that massive airstrikes risk unintentionally consolidating Iran’s internal solidarity.

Israel has not announced further action in Yazd. But IDF Defense Minister Katz maintains that additional strikes are possible. Iran threatens retribution. With the US now openly engaged, analysts fear dangerous escalation.

Regional and Global Impact

Airspace disruptions and interrupted oil markets already show global concern. In the meantime, shipping lanes are threatened by Houthi attacks in retaliation for US Israel involvement.

Israel’s attack that killed 10 IRGC personnel in Yazd deepens a fast-growing regional war. With American backing, Israel has pounded Iran’s military and nuclear infrastructure. But as Iran threatens to retaliate, the danger of wider conflict is ever-present. The world now waits to see if these punches lead Iran to the bargaining table—or to a wider war.

What Could Iran Do in Response to US Strikes on Its Nuclear Sites | TDG Explainer

June 23, 2025, 1:07 pm

Over the weekend, the United States launched airstrikes on three key Iranian nuclear sites—Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan. This action officially pulls the US into the ongoing Israel–Iran conflict, making it highly unlikely that Iran will remain idle. According to Ellie Geranmayeh of the European Council on Foreign Relations, Iran’s swift retaliation is now “inevitable” and expected to be “multi‐layered” . Despite limited conventional strength after previous Israeli strikes, Iran wants the US and Israel to “lose,” even if it cannot outright win .

Potential Retaliation Routes

1. Direct Hit on US Forces in the Region

Iran could target American infrastructure or troops stationed in the Middle East. The US has about 40,000 soldiers across 20 bases in countries like Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, UAE, Iraq, and Syria.

Experts suggest Iran might announce limited strikes on US-linked facilities—without causing casualties—to send a warning while leaving space for de-escalation .
Bloomberg analyst Dina Esfandiary notes this approach allows Iran to signal strength without igniting a full-blown conflict.

2. Cyber Warfare Attacks

Iran boasts strong cyber capabilities. The cyber group CyberAv3ngers, linked to the IRGC, is reportedly behind high-profile hacks—and even has a $10 million US bounty on its head . Iran might use these digital weapons against critical US infrastructure during its response.

3. Disrupting the Strait of Hormuz

The Strait of Hormuz handles about 20% of global oil exports and is crucial to China, India, and Western nations.

Iran could mine the waters or use missile and boat attacks to intimidate ships.
If the route closes, oil prices could spike to $120 per barrel, possibly pushing US inflation up to 5% .
The uncertainty itself may pressure Western economies to seek de-escalation.

4. Attacking Oil Infrastructure

While less probable, Iran might strike energy facilities in friendly Gulf countries like Saudi Arabia or the UAE—similar to the 2019 Houthi attacks that disrupted Saudi’s oil output by nearly half.

5. Pursuing Nuclear Capabilities

Although the US took out three nuclear sites, analysts say Iran may still retain enriched uranium . Feeling cornered, Tehran could accelerate a nuclear weapons program—marking the most dangerous possible escalation.

Additional Context and Stakes

Strategic Politics: Iran may also retaliate through proxies in Lebanon (Hezbollah), Yemen (Houthis), or Iraq—all of which could target US or Israeli interests across the region.
Global Security: While cyberspace and oil routes are likely targets, Iran might try to limit civilian casualties to avoid an all-out war.
Diplomacy in Play: Behind the scenes, countries like Turkey, Russia, and China may push for negotiations to prevent further escalation.
Time Factor: Iran must strike a balance—it needs to react quickly to achieve deterrence, but without provoking a larger conflict.

Iran’s response will likely span military, cyber, and economic domains. It may involve targeted strikes against US infrastructure, cyberattacks, disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, possible Gulf-region energy sabotage, and perhaps even nuclear escalation—all calibrated to maximize impact while avoiding total war.

Iran Fires 40 Missiles At Israel Following US Strikes, Injuring 23 And Damaging Homes

June 22, 2025, 10:01 pm

Hours after American airstrikes hit three Iranian nuclear sites, Iran fired over 40 missiles at Israel on Sunday and injured 23 people, with most of the cities suffering major damage.

In Tel Aviv, which has one of the largest impact zones, a high-rise apartment building had severe structural damage with its front face ripped off. Some adjacent buildings, such as a nursing home, were damaged in a wide radius of blast. Authorities attributed the low number of casualties to evacuations conducted on time and residents reaching shelters.

Deputy Mayor Haim Goren commended emergency response work at the scene. Nursing home residents, many of whom needed assistance, were evacuated safely. Windows were broken up to the 11th floor, leaving residents dazed. “It’s like a typhoon hit my apartment,” said Ofer Berger, a resident whose seventh-floor apartment was demolished.

Emergency officials verified that one was moderately hurt by shrapnel and dozens were lightly injured. Resettled residents assembled outdoors with pets and personal effects, amidst broken glass and deformed metal. “One Heart” aid group volunteers helped with the recovery.

The Israeli Defense Forces put the number of residents displaced at more than 9,000 since fighting started, with over 240 buildings and 2,000 apartments damaged. 79-year-old Mira Goshen explained the horrifying experience as her apartment was reduced to rubble. Her pet bird, Chica, survived an 11-story drop by miracle.

Debris was removed and food and water handed out by municipal workers before nearby businesses reopened with shattered goods still on the shelves but no one inside.

While life resumes amid devastation, Goren noted rising stress levels from nightly attacks and shelter confinements. Temporary shelters are being set up in public spaces.

“I’m not thinking about the US or Iran,” Goshen added. “I just want to know where I’ll go now.”

Gulf States On High Alert As US Joins Israel In Iran Strikes, Fears Of Wider War Grow

June 22, 2025, 9:36 pm

Gulf states were on heightened alert Sunday after US President Donald Trump confirmed that American troops had conducted attacks against Iran’s key nuclear facilities, employing bunker-busting bombs in tandem with Israeli operations. The action represented a major escalation in the regional conflict.

Gulf leaders such as the UAE President, Qatar’s Emir, and Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince called for the utmost restraint despite fears over regional security. The UAE state news agency said that emergency consultations were being conducted on the broader implications of the war.

Saudi Arabia, the global leader in oil exports, increased security following the attacks, according to sources familiar with the matter. Bahrain, home to the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet, told citizens to shun central roads and said 70% of its government workers would telecommute. The nation also set in motion emergency measures, sounded out sirens, and opened up 33 shelters.

Kuwait put its defense council in constant session and started establishing public shelters. Tehran, for its part, threatened to retaliate against American assets in the area. Iran’s parliament voted to close the critical Strait of Hormuz, through which nearly 20% of world oil and gas, pending final approval by the Supreme National Security Council.

While Saudi Arabian and UAE nuclear authorities reported no radiation leakages, speculations of a full-scale war continue. Singapore Airlines and British Airways suspended flights to and from the region in light of security concerns and restricted airspace.

Experts cautioned that direct US military intervention risks drawing the Gulf states of Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait deeper into fighting, sparking concerns of a long regional war. The international community remains closely watching developments amid increased tensions and in disarray civil life across the Gulf.

Iran Under Crisis As US Backs Israel: Khamenei’s Regime Near Breaking Point?

June 22, 2025, 5:09 pm

Ayatollah Khamenei now faces his most challenging moment since assuming power in 1989. As the US officially joins Israel’s war against Iran, fears of regime collapse have intensified. The US airstrikes on Saturday destroyed key Iranian nuclear sites, hitting Khamenei’s most vital leverage.

Israel had already degraded Iran’s military infrastructure, air defences, and proxy networks. Now, Khamenei stands nearly isolated, with little support from his battered Axis of Resistance. This internal and external pressure has left the Islamic Republic at its most vulnerable in more than four decades. Most analysts declare regime change not a far-off concept anymore.

From 1979 Revolution to 2025 Survival Fight

Iran’s ride started with Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who had promised to export the Islamic Revolution and eliminate Israel. In 2025, his heir, Khamenei, is merely attempting to hold on to what remains. While Israel deems this clash to be part of a war that has been ongoing since 1979, Tehran now contends with the direct intervention of the United States.

Alvite Ningthoujam, Symbiosis International University’s deputy director, believes Khamenei has no genuine alternatives. Israel’s Operation Rising Lion and US interference have destroyed Iran’s traditional deterrence as well as brought the regime to the precipice.

No Easy Path to Regime Change

Unlike Syria or Iraq, there is no apparent invasion or domestic armed resistance. Yet Khamenei might still fall. If the Supreme Leader and senior IRGC commanders are killed, the leadership void could usher in a new era. Even if he keeps his head intact, moderates might seize power in the face of increasing public discontent. That also would be a regime change.

Iranian internal frustration is famous. In 2022–23, large demonstrations erupted in response to the regime’s brutality, revealing fundamental fissures within. Israel’s strikes now can exacerbate those cracks—or trigger national solidarity.

Khamenei’s Dilemma: Fight, Surrender or Fall

Khamenei has two bad options. If he abandons the nuclear programme, he forfeits his sole lever of influence and gets toppled in a Gaddafi-esque manner. If he retains it, he courts further devastation. Either option takes his regime away from legitimacy.

Israel has already won a few objectives, according to Professor Daphne Richemond Barak of Reichman University. The Iranian nuclear programme is disable. The regime is weakened. And the US is now involved.

She continues, “This was a proxy war. Now Israel has attacked the head of the octopus.” Iran, she contends, cannot easily recover, as both its military capabilities and its network of proxies are left battered.

Will the Regime Survive the Storm?

The future hangs in the balance of whether Khamenei decides on escalation or negotiation. Trump’s administration has packaged the strikes as a means of compelling Iran to the table. But the ultimate result may not be a treaty—quite possibly, it might be the end of the regime we have come to know.

With its local influence broken and nuclear capability downgraded, Iran’s Supreme Leader is isolated. What started as an ideologically based revolution now threatens to conclude as a collapsed theocracy on its last legs.

PM Modi Urges ‘Immediate De-escalation’ in Call With Iran’s President

June 22, 2025, 4:54 pm

PM Narendra Modi addressed Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Sunday, shortly after the United States attacked three of Iran’s most important nuclear sites. In the aftermath of rising West Asia tensions, PM Modi emphasized the imperative for de-escalation, dialogue, and restoration of regional peace and stability.

The US strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan trigger global backlash and risk a wider war. Iran has denounced the move and threatened “severe consequences,” while Modi has put India squarely in the camp of peace.

PM Modi Appeals for Peace and Dialogue

Tweeing on X , PM Modi stated: “Spoke with President of Iran @drpezeshkian. Discussed in great detail the situation now. Conveyed deep concern at recent escalations. Repeated our call for de-escalation immediately, dialogue and diplomacy as the path forward and for early return of regional peace, security and stability.”

Spoke with President of Iran @drpezeshkian. We discussed in detail about the current situation. Expressed deep concern at the recent escalations. Reiterated our call for immediate de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy as the way forward and for early restoration of regional…

— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) June 22, 2025

This marks one of India’s most direct interventions since the US-Israel offensive on Iranian nuclear assets began. The timing of the call—just hours after the airstrikes—highlights New Delhi’s growing diplomatic stake in West Asian stability.

Fordow, Natanz, Isfahan Struck by US

The United States deployed six B-2 stealth bombers to demolish Iran’s deeply fortified Fordow facility. The US also fired 30 Tomahawk cruise missiles from submarines to strike Natanz and Isfahan, according to reports.

US President Donald Trump referred to the attack as a “spectacular military success,” stating that additional attacks would continue if Iran retaliates.

Iran Responds with Anger

Iran’s Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi denounced the US attack. It was a “serious violation” of international law and the UN Charter, he said. In a forcefully worded statement on X, Araghchi blamed the US for “criminal activities” and threatened that the strikes would carry “eternal repercussions.”

“Every single member of the UN should be concerned about this extremely risky, lawless and criminal activity,” Araghchi added.

India’s Role in an Unstable Region

India traditionally has enjoyed close relations with both the United States and Iran. With millions of Indian nationals resident across the Gulf and vital energy interests involved, New Delhi has maintained a delicate diplomatic balancing act.

PM Modi’s call with Pezeshkian reflects a wider concern that open conflict between Iran and the West could destabilize trade routes, oil supply, and regional alliances. His message of “dialogue and diplomacy” aligns with India’s long-standing principle of non-alignment and peaceful resolution.

UK On Alert After US Iran Strike, Minister Claims ‘Informed But Not Involved’

June 22, 2025, 3:21 pm

UK claimed that it was aware of the US strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities—Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan—prior to their execution. However, London did not receive any such request to utilize its military bases, such as Diego Garcia or RAF Akrotiri, Trade Minister Jonathan Reynolds informed Sky News.

In the meantime, UK PM Keir Starmer is in close consultation with the allies after the strikes. Keir Starmer also supported the US strike, saying Iran should never possess a nuclear weapon.

No Plea for UK Facility Use

Jonathan Reynolds attested that the US never requested to use British facilities. “We didn’t get a request to Diego Garcia or RAF Akrotiri,” he stated. However, Britain sent more military equipment into the area and stood ready to defend its citizens and infrastructure.

He went on, “We were notified, as you would expect, prior to the strikes occurring”. This warning was intended to enable London to trigger contingency plans, such as evacuation flights.

PM Keir Starmer is coordinating the international effort. He will talk to partners during the morning, Jonathan Reynolds added. PM Starmer once again spoke of the US strikes as designed to stop Iran’s nuclear ambitions, as necessary in his words. But he underlined the call for diplomacy and appealed to Iran to come back to the negotiating table.

UK on High Alert

The government has increased security for its soldiers and citizens. Defence Secretary John Healey declared force protection at its strongest point. He also confirmed additional planes and support personnel deployed to the area.

Jonathan Reynolds stated that the UK is standing ready to evacuate from Israel early next week and is helping British nationals in neighboring nations.

Diplomatic Balance Amid Escalation

While London is committed to nuclear non-proliferation, it fell short of an overt military intervention. Rather, Britain prioritizes deterrence in the form of preparedness and diplomacy. As Iran threatened “severe consequences,” the Starmer administration wants to walk a tightrope between solidarity with Washington and restraint from Tehran.

After the airstrikes, international alarm reached its highest level. The UN, EU, and UK called for de-escalation and re-opened diplomatic options. In the region, the allies of Iran—Germany, France, and Gulf states—re-affirmed the support for the negotiation process. Pakistan denounced the airstrikes as rapid violations and called for restraint.

What This Means for the UK?

• Strategic neutrality: No direct involvement, but prior notification and preparedness to offer help.
• Protective posture: Top security and evacuation procedures in progress.
• Diplomatic thrust: Starmer demands full-fledged talks despite his endorsement of the US position.

On the whole, the UK eschews escalation but stands firmly as a world power in deterrence and diplomacy in the face of escalating tensions.

Pakistan Calls US Iran Strike ‘Violation of Law’ Day After Nominating Trump for Nobel Peace Prize

June 22, 2025, 2:45 pm

In a dramatic turnaround, Pakistan on Sunday condemned the US bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities—only a day after it had announced nominating President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. The US attack targeted Iran’s vital nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan.

This action formally put America in the present Israel-Iran conflict. The Pakistan condemnation occurs even as it recently thanked Trump for his contribution to de-escalating the tension between India and Pakistan last month.

Pakistan Calls US Strike a Violation of Law

The Pakistani foreign ministry made a harsh remark hours following the US attacks. It declared that Islamabad was “gravely concerned at the possible further escalation of tensions in the region.” The release continued that the airstrikes against Iran breached all international norms of law and that Iran had a right to defend itself under the UN Charter.

Pakistan, whose border with Iran is 900 kilometres in length, threatened that future violence would have “severely damaging implications” not only for the region but also beyond.

Call for Diplomacy and De-escalation

Islamabad urged an end to the military fight immediately. It asserted that the hostilities should cease, and the participating countries should go back to diplomacy and dialogue. The sole sustainable course of action, in the opinion of Pakistan, is one based on the UN Charter’s principles.

Pakistan’s comment also mentioned the Israeli attack that initiated the conflict. Israel had asserted last week that Tehran was near the production of a nuclear weapon, leading it to conduct its initial military attack on Iran.

Trump Nominated for Peace Amid New Warfront

Only a day before this, Pakistan had lauded President Trump for his “bold diplomatic intervention” in the May battle between India and Pakistan. It officially announced that it would be proposing him for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2026.

The move came just three days after Trump received Pakistan Army chief General Asim Munir at the White House. Pakistan has attributed Trump’s measures to contributing to cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan that had increased after a terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam on April 22.

India had undertaken Operation Sindoor on May 7 to target terror camps in Pakistan and PoK. Pakistan retaliated with missiles and drones, but India hit back by bombing Pakistani airfields. A ceasefire was announced on May 10.

Trump Defends Iran Strike as ‘Spectacular Success’

On Sunday, Trump hailed the US airstrikes in Iran as a “very successful attack.” Trump asserted that the attacks had “completely and totally obliterated” Iran’s most important nuclear enrichment sites. Referring to Iran as the “bully of the Middle East,” Trump threatened Tehran that if it does not opt for peace, the next attacks will be “far greater.

He also warned of swift and accurate attacks on remaining targets. “Most of them can be removed in a matter of minutes,” Trump told his televised speech.

US Bases in Middle East on Alert as Iran Vows ‘Severe Consequences’

June 22, 2025, 2:19 pm

Following joint US-Israeli attacks leveling Iran’s nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, tensions have escalated throughout West Asia. Iran has threatened to unleash immediate and “severe consequences.” The Pentagon now prepares for an expected Iranian retaliation that may directly affect American troops and equipment scattered throughout the Middle East.

The US maintains over 40,000 soldiers stationed at bases and warships under the US Central Command (CENTCOM), spanning Qatar, Bahrain, Iraq, Syria, Kuwait, and the UAE. Each location is of strategic significance—and vulnerability.

Tehran Promises Quick and Harsh Retaliation

Iran’s Foreign Ministry called the attacks a “serious violation” of the UN Charter. State media ratcheted up the threat, proclaiming that “every American citizen and soldier” in the region is now fair game.

High regime official Hossein Shariatmadari demanded a missile attack on the US Navy presence in Bahrain and complete blockade of the Strait of Hormuz—a global oil chokepoint. These demands came after Ayatollah Khamenei issued his own threat of “harsh consequences” for US intervention.

CENTCOM in the Crosshairs

CENTCOM centralizes all American military action from Egypt to Afghanistan. With troops based throughout the region, it has rapid deployment and air superiority. These bases—especially in Bahrain, Qatar, and the UAE—are advanced logistics, refueling, drone base of operations, and command infrastructure.

But they are in range of Iranian missile and drone capabilities. Iranian proxies like Hezbollah and Iraqi Shiite militias would also be mobilized for indirect attacks.

Bahrain: Naval Stronghold in the Gulf

The US Navy’s Fifth Fleet is hosted by Bahrain. Its port can accommodate aircraft carriers, anti-mine warfare ships, and logistics ships. Due to its location in the Gulf, it is a favorite target of the Iranians.

In 2020, Iran openly mentioned it as one of the targeting sites following the assassination of Qasem Soleimani.

Qatar’s Al Udeid Air Base

Al Udeid Air Base is CENTCOM’s largest installation in the Middle East. Thousands of troops and crucial aircraft for regional air operations are based there.

Iran considers it to be a crucial command node supporting US military capability.

Iraq: Susceptible to Direct and Proxy Attacks

The US maintains Al Asad and Al Harir air bases in Iraq. Both have faced drone and rocket attacks from Iran-backed militias.

Al Asad was directly struck by Iranian missiles in 2020 in response to Soleimani’s death.

Syria: Strategic Yet Exposed

American troops in Syria are based in places such as Al Tanf, close to Jordan and Iraq borders. They serve to augment anti-ISIS missions but are extremely vulnerable, particularly to Iranian proxies settled in the area.

Kuwait and UAE: Strategic Logistics and Air Power Hubs

Kuwait’s Ali al-Salem Air Base and Camp Arifjan facilitate quick combat deployment and logistics. Al Dhafra Air Base in the UAE accommodates F-22 Raptors, MQ-9 drones, and surveillance aircraft. Its missile defense training center is central to regional air defense.

Strait of Hormuz: A Global Flashpoint

Iran has threatened time and time again to close down the Strait of Hormuz, an action that could strangle 20% of the world’s oil supply. Anything done here would trigger a world economic and military crisis. The presence of the US Navy in Bahrain is a direct deterrent to this kind of action.

With tensions at boiling point, every American base in the Middle East is now under potential danger. Whether Iran hits back directly, via proxies, or with cyberattacks—CENTCOM’s presence is at the centre of Tehran’s crosshairs.

Iran Fires 30 Missiles After US Bombs Nuclear Sites, Defies Trump’s Warning

June 22, 2025, 12:52 pm

In a dramatic escalation, Iran fired 30 missiles at Israel just hours following the US bombing of three of its key nuclear sites—Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. The aggressive action by Tehran comes even as US President Donald Trump issued a firm warning against retaliation.

At least 11 people were injured in the new missile attacks, which hit central Israel early yesterday morning, reports Israeli authorities. The attacks open a perilous new page in the swiftly escalating war between Iran, Israel, and the United States.

Missiles Strike Central Israel

The missile barrage began around 7:30 am local time (0430 GMT). Iranian state television interrupted its regular programming to announce the attack, calling it a response to the “occupied territories.” The missiles, launched in two waves, managed to hit targets across Israel—including a direct strike in the central region.

Israel’s Magen David Adom rescue service said 11 were hospitalized. One of the wounded, a 30-year-old man, was moderately injured when shrapnel struck his upper torso. KAN 11, Israel’s public broadcaster, broadcast a scene of a badly damaged building ringed with debris and rubble.

Tehran’s Swift Retaliation Sends Clear Message

This missile strike was not a retaliatory delay—it was rapid, deliberate, and immediate. Iran did not delay reacting after US aircraft bombed its most sensitive nuclear sites overnight. The Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan facilities lie at the heart of Iran’s uranium enrichment programme. Iran has indicated that it will no longer remain passive in the face of aggression as it hit back so promptly.

Iranian television regularly pointed to the extent of the response, with a presenter announcing on television, “30 missiles have been fired at Israel from Iran,” referencing unidentified sources.

Trump’s Warning Ignored

President Trump had threatened Iran not to respond after the US-led assault. But Tehran’s leadership appears to have disregarded the threat. The missile attack indicates that Iran will risk further escalation, even at the cost of direct confrontation with Israel and the United States.

The next few days could witness some more military exchanges as tensions escalate. What is certain is that diplomacy has all but disintegrated—for now, missiles are speaking.”.

US Cities on Alert as Trump Strikes Iran’s Nuclear Sites, Sirens in Israel

June 22, 2025, 10:58 am

Sirens blared throughout Israel. Iranian-launched missiles prompted warning alerts as Israeli Air Force planes took off to intercept. Meanwhile, major US cities such as Washington DC and New York City were put on high alert, hours following President Donald Trump’s confirmation that the United States had attacked three main Iranian nuclear facilities—Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.

While the Middle East hangs in the balance, India initiated Operation Sindhu to bring its citizens out of the war-torn country. In the meantime, Iranian media confirmed 430 civilians killed and more than 3,500 wounded since June 13 when fighting broke out.

Missile Threat Brings Israel and US to the Brink

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) attested to the threat from Iran in a report:

“A short while ago, sirens sounded in several areas across Israel following the identification of missiles launched from Iran toward the State of Israel,” the Israeli Defense Forces announced. The Israeli Air Force (IAF) began intercepting incoming threats. Authorities ordered civilians to follow Home Front Command instructions. This was no drill.

🚨Sirens sounding across Israel due to another Iranian missile launch🚨

— Israel Defense Forces (@IDF) June 22, 2025

Israeli air defenses sprang into action quickly, and emergency protocols were activated in American cities as panic of Iranian retaliation spread. These actions indicate how seriously the strike is taken — and the worldwide repercussions it’s setting off.

Trump Sends a Message of Strength

President Trump called the airstrikes a “spectacular success.” He authenticated that US aircraft struck Iran’s nuclear facilities and came back home safely. Trump also cautioned Tehran: “Make peace or face worse,” labeling Iran the “bully of the Middle East.”

The raid is the most overt US military intervention in Iranian territory in decades — and indicates Washington’s unwavering support of Israel.

Netanyahu Backs Trump’s Action

Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu welcomed the US action. In a statement, he stated:

“President Trump and I frequently say: ‘Peace through strength.’ Strength first, then peace. And tonight, Donald Trump and the United States acted with a great deal of strength.”
The comments cast the strikes as needed for stability in the region — although tensions remain on the rise.

As armed forces engage, Iranian civilians suffer. State media reported more than 430 fatalities and 3,500 injuries since June 13. The numbers account for victims of both Israeli and American attacks. Health systems in the affected provinces are overwhelmed, and humanitarian access is still restricted.

India acts with Operation Sindhu

India initiated Operation Sindhu in reaction to the worsening crisis. The Ministry of External Affairs reported that more than 500 Indians have already been repatriated. Evacuation flights from Israel and Iran continue, with authorities still tracking threats.

As the two countries plunge further into war, India’s quick response has been commended for its diplomatic pressure.

World Watches — Tensions Mount

With aerial bombings, missile threats, and military build-ups in the mix, the Iran-Israel conflict has reached a perilous new level. Trump’s intervention has converted a regional standoff into a trilateral crisis. Israel is still on high military alert. Iran has threatened retaliation.

While India is racing against time to evacuate its citizens, global leaders are appealing for restraint — with little success to date.

Saudi Arabia Confirms No Radiation Risk Amid Iran-Israel Tensions

June 22, 2025, 10:51 am

Saudi Arabia’s Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Commission (NRRC) confirmed that radiation levels across the Kingdom remain safe and normal, despite recent military escalations between Iran and Israel.

Iran Confirms No Leaks After US Strikes

Earlier, Iran reported no radiation leaks at its nuclear facilities in Isfahan, Fordow, and Natanz after recent US airstrikes.
Iran’s National Nuclear Safety System Centre stated, “There was no radioactive release,” according to Iranian state media.

NRRC Confirms Safety Within Saudi Arabia

Soon after, the NRRC posted on X (formerly Twitter) that radiation levels in Saudi Arabia were well within safe limits.
It stated, “No radiation leaks have been detected.” The commission also confirmed that its environmental monitoring systems are working continuously.

Arak Reactor Not a Threat

On Friday, the NRRC responded to concerns over a strike on Iran’s Arak research reactor. It clarified that the reactor does not contain nuclear fuel, so it poses no radiological threat. There has been no impact on the Kingdom’s environment or public health.

Emergency Center on High Alert

The commission reassured the public that its emergency operations center runs 24/7. It monitors the situation and is ready to respond to any nuclear threat. Safety protocols are fully in place to protect the public if conditions change.

Water Supply Is Safe

The NRRC also addressed concerns about water contamination. It said Saudi desalination systems can filter out both salt and radioactive materials. The commission affirmed, “Our water remains safe for use.” Monitoring has been increased as a precaution, but no danger has been detected.

No Emergency Response Needed Yet

Earlier this week, the NRRC reviewed its predictive risk models, which include GCC nations. Based on the data, the commission said there is no need to activate the national nuclear emergency plan.

Public Updates Will Continue

The NRRC promised to keep the public fully informed. It said it remains committed to protecting public health and the environment, even as regional tensions continue.

India Delays First Evacuation Flight from Israel Amid US-Iran Strikes

June 22, 2025, 10:25 am

India faces tough choices after it postponed its first evacuation flight from Israel. The US has bombed three Iranian nuclear facilities, disrupting Operation Sindhu. India had already sent back four evacuation flights from Iran. It was going to bring out students in Israel shortly.

Now, that operation is on hold. This postponement underlines additional risks associated with US intervention. The Indian government now deals with a fast-changing crisis.

Operation Sindhu Under Way

India commenced Operation Sindhu on June 18 to evacuate citizens from Iran and Israel in the Middle East conflict. Four flights so far have returned hundreds of Indian students from Iran. The first took 110 students through Armenia to Delhi on June 19. 827 Indians have so far returned home as of June 21.

India also evacuated Nepalese and Sri Lankans under the same operation. Several more are still in Iran—about 1,100 have requested evacuation assistance.

US Strike Throws Evacuation into Disarray

On June 22, the US bombed Iran’s Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz nuclear facilities with bunker-buster bombs to impede nuclear development. The bombing created international shock and made India delay its first evacuation flight from Israel.

India previously declared that it would start evacuating Israelis from Israel this week. But the US action caused it to stop. Authorities now evaluate if it’s safe to continue. The delay creates unease among Indian workers and students in Israel.

National Safety Remains Top Priority

The MEA has renewed its pledge for citizen security. It advised Indian citizens in Israel to utilize embassy helplines and register online. Delhi also keeps its Operation Sindhu initiative running in Iran. Additional flights are to be sent to evacuees from Turkmenistan through Ashgabat. The government is working in liaison with Iran to arrange safe passage as well as to open airspace.

This abrupt US military intervention complicates the situation. India has to balance evacuation planning with geopolitical considerations. The US strikes may heighten Iran-Israel tensions. Escalation will raise danger to Indian citizens in the region. The delay highlights how conflicts overseas can spill over into evacuation schedules.

Way Forward for India

India now has a delicate operation on its hands. Authorities need to keep a close eye on local developments. They need unambiguous security analyses before rearranging the Israel evacuation.

Meanwhile, they have to maintain the pace in Iran—and keep assisting stranded citizens. Delays are devastating for students and families. Clear and prompt communication will be crucial. India needs to hedge between prudence and determination. In doing this, it has to make sure that no citizen gets left behind as diplomatic storms rage across the Middle East.

Khamenei Names Secret Successors As Assassination Fears Mount In Iran-Israel Conflict

June 22, 2025, 3:30 am

Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has taken measures to ensure that there will be continuity of leadership in case of an assassination attempt as tensions rise between Iran and Israel, the New York Times cited Iranian officials who are not named as saying.

The 86-year-old leader has named three potential successors, the report said, as concerns over his safety mount during the ongoing conflict. Speculation around Khamenei’s successor has been circulating for years, but the urgency has grown with the rising military tension between Iran and Israel.

Iran’s constitution establishes a straightforward succession plan. When the Supreme Leader dies or becomes incapacitated, the 88-seat Assembly of Experts made up of veteran Islamic jurists and clerics is obligated to select a replacement. The Supreme Leader serves as head of state both religiously and politically and has final say over Iran’s military and policy.

Backed by the online platform Amwaj, Khamenei just ordered the Assembly to meet in an emergency if he gets murdered or incapacitated to lead. The Times also reported that Khamenei has been living in a safe bunker and abstaining from all forms of electronic communication. Instead, he is said to be communicating with the military commanders using a trusted middleman.

While the succession mechanism is institutionalized, insiders informed Amwaj that contingency measures involve a potential leadership council of clerics a model under consideration when Iran’s founding leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, passed away in 1989.

Such a council would be put in place if Khamenei were assassinated and the war continues, providing more balanced leadership in a time of national crisis. But analysts warn that if robust leadership and the ability to act quickly are preferred, Iran will again choose one successor to rule.

The location of Khamenei is still unknown, although he has released public statements and issued fresh threats against Israel in recent days.