Latest International Criminal Court (ICC) News | Top International Criminal Court (ICC) News Headlines Today | Today India news | Breaking International Criminal Court (ICC) News Today | English International Criminal Court (ICC) News Headlines - TheDailyGuardian

Trump Targets ICC with Sanctions Over Netanyahu’s Arrest Warrant

February 7, 2025, 9:14 am

US President Donald Trump has imposed sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC). This move came just days after his meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. According to the White House, these sanctions are “aggressive” and a direct response to the ICC’s actions against the US and Israel.

Executive Order Grants Trump Broad Powers

Under the executive order, Trump has the authority to freeze assets and impose travel bans on ICC officials and their families. Specifically, these sanctions apply if they participate in investigations or prosecutions against US citizens or allies. Notably, this decision follows the ICC’s issuance of arrest warrants for Netanyahu and former Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant. In addition, the court also accused deceased Hamas leaders Ismail Haniyeh and Mohammad Dief of war crimes in Gaza.

Trump Accuses ICC of Overreach

Moreover, Trump accused the ICC of “abusing power” by targeting Netanyahu and Gallant. He warned that this decision “set a dangerous precedent” and could put US citizens and military personnel at risk. In his statement, he asserted, “This malign conduct in turn threatens to infringe upon the sovereignty of the United States and undermines the critical national security and foreign policy work of the United States government and our allies, including Israel.”

Trump Warns of Harsh Consequences

Furthermore, Trump emphasized that neither the US nor Israel is an ICC member. Therefore, he insisted that the court must “respect the decision” of countries that reject its authority. He also warned that the US “will impose tangible and significant consequences on those responsible for the ICC’s transgressions.” These consequences include freezing assets and banning ICC officials and their families from entering the US.

At the same time, it remains unclear which officials will be sanctioned. However, ICC leaders are already preparing for the impact. According to The Guardian, Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan and other senior court officials worked late into the night, waiting for the White House announcement.

Strong Backlash and Political Opposition

Meanwhile, Trump’s order has faced significant backlash. Just last week, a bill proposing broad sanctions against the ICC stalled in the Senate because Democrats refused to support it. In response, Amnesty International’s Secretary General, Agnès Callamard, strongly condemned the order. She remarked, “Today’s executive order is vindictive. It is aggressive. It is a brutal step that seeks to undermine and destroy what the international community has painstakingly constructed over decades if not centuries: global rules that are applicable to everyone and aim to deliver justice for all.”

Additionally, she criticized the decision for sending the message that “Israel is above the law and the universal principles of international justice.”

Trump Has Sanctioned ICC Before

Importantly, this is not the first time Trump has taken action against the ICC. Back in 2020, during his first term, he issued a similar order. At that time, he imposed travel bans and asset freezes on former ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda and another top court official.

That order, in particular, was a response to Bensouda’s investigation into war crimes in Afghanistan and Palestinian territories. Then, in 2021, she escalated it to a formal criminal probe. Eventually, her successor, Karim Khan, took over the investigation and accelerated it after Hamas’ October 7 attack in Israel.

Dutch Court Allows Arms Exports to Israel, NGOs Call It an Injustice

December 14, 2024, 7:21 am

A Dutch court rejected a request from 10 pro-Palestinian NGOs to stop weapon exports to Israel. The court explained that the government has some discretion in its policies. It also stated that judicial intervention should not happen quickly, according to reports.

Court’s Decision

The Hague Court declared:
“The interim relief court finds that there is no reason to impose a total ban on the export of military and dual-use goods on the state. All claims are dismissed.”

This decision followed arguments by the NGOs that the Dutch government must prevent genocide. As signatories to the 1948 Genocide Convention, they claimed the government had a legal duty. Additionally, they accused Israel of using Dutch weapons in attacks that caused high civilian casualties in Gaza.

NGOs’ Arguments

The NGOs’ lawyer, Wout Albers, stressed:
“Israel is guilty of genocide and apartheid and is using Dutch weapons to wage war.”

Furthermore, the NGOs referred to a January order by the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The order urged Israel to prevent acts of genocide in Gaza.

Criticism of the Verdict

Nevertheless, the NGOs strongly criticized the ruling. Shawan Jabarin, director of Al-Haq, called it a serious injustice:
“The Netherlands has abandoned the most basic rules of international law, to prevent colonisation, annexation, apartheid and genocide,” he said.

Recent Events in Gaza

Meanwhile, an Israeli airstrike hit a residential building in Gaza’s Nuseirat refugee camp on Thursday. The attack killed at least 40 Palestinians and injured dozens, according to Al Jazeera.

ICC Developments

In addition, the International Criminal Court (ICC) recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, and Hamas’s military chief Mohammed Deif. The ICC accused them of crimes against humanity. It alleged they used “starvation as a method of warfare” by blocking aid and targeting civilians.

Death Toll

According to Gaza’s health ministry, Israeli offensives have killed over 44,805 people in Gaza since October last year.

Overall, the court’s ruling and ongoing conflict have fueled criticism. These events also highlight concerns about accountability and justice in international law.

ICC Targets Myanmar’s Military Leader For Rohingya Atrocities In Major Legal Move

November 27, 2024, 6:46 pm

The prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) announced on Wednesday that he would seek an arrest warrant for Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, accusing him of crimes against humanity in the alleged persecution of the Rohingya Muslim minority. The charges relate to the 2017 military offensive that forced over a million Rohingya to flee, mostly to neighboring Bangladesh.

A spokesperson for Myanmar’s ruling junta did not respond to requests for comment, but international human rights groups have long accused the Myanmar military of committing atrocities during the operation, including mass killings, sexual violence, and the destruction of hundreds of villages in Rakhine state. The United Nations has referred to the offensive as “ethnic cleansing.”

Myanmar’s military government denies the allegations, claiming its actions were legitimate operations against militants who attacked police posts. Despite these denials, Rohingya refugees who fled to Bangladesh live in dire conditions, with many enduring years of hardship in refugee camps.

Mohammed Zubair, a Rohingya researcher living in a Bangladesh camp, emphasized the role of Min Aung Hlaing in orchestrating the violence. “Under his command, the military killed thousands of Rohingya and subjected countless women and girls to horrific acts of sexual violence,” Zubair said.

Nicholas Koumjian, head of the UN Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar, underscored the significance of seeking an arrest warrant for such a high-ranking official. “Seeking a warrant for the person who holds the highest military position in Myanmar sends a strong message to perpetrators that no one stands above the law,” he said.

A panel of three judges will now assess whether there are sufficient grounds to believe that Min Aung Hlaing bears criminal responsibility for the deportation and persecution of the Rohingya. While there is no set timeline for the ruling, such decisions typically take around three months.

This move comes as the ICC prosecutor faces political backlash, particularly from Washington, following its recent arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defense chief Yoav Gallant. However, the ICC stands by its independent investigation, which has drawn on witness testimonies, documentary evidence, and other materials.

Myanmar is not a member of the ICC, but judges have ruled that the court has jurisdiction over crimes committed partially in neighboring Bangladesh, an ICC member state. This ruling allowed the ICC to launch its investigation in 2018 and pursue arrest warrants.

The ICC’s investigation into the persecution of the Rohingya has been ongoing for nearly five years, but it has faced significant challenges, including a lack of access to Myanmar due to the ongoing political turmoil after the military coup in 2021.

Human rights organizations have welcomed the ICC’s move. Maria Elena Vignoli from Human Rights Watch called it an important step to break the cycle of impunity that has long fueled the military’s violations.

The ICC, which prosecutes individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and aggression, relies on states to enforce its arrest warrants. Given Min Aung Hlaing’s limited international travel, his arrest could present a significant challenge for the ICC. The court has faced difficulties in bringing other high-profile leaders, such as Sudan’s Omar al-Bashir and Russia’s Vladimir Putin, to trial. However, the court’s efforts continue, with the hope that holding Min Aung Hlaing accountable could signal a shift toward justice for the Rohingya.

Dreyfus Trial Explained; Netanyahu Denounces ICC Charges As Anti-Semitic

November 22, 2024, 12:18 pm

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and Hamas leader Mohammed Deif, accusing them of war crimes and crimes against humanity during the ongoing Gaza conflict.

Netanyahu condemned the ICC’s decision, calling it “anti-Semitic” and comparing it to the infamous Dreyfus trial. “The anti-Semitic decision of the International Criminal Court is comparable to the modern-day Dreyfus trial and it will end in the same way,” Netanyahu stated.

What Was the Dreyfus Trial?

The Dreyfus trial was a notorious case of anti-Semitism in late 19th-century France. Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish military officer, was falsely convicted of treason in 1894 based on fabricated evidence. Publicly humiliated and sentenced to life imprisonment, his case sparked widespread controversy. Eventually, new evidence proved his innocence, but only after years of judicial and public battles exposing institutional anti-Semitism.

Israel and Global Reactions

The Israeli Prime Minister’s Office strongly opposed the ICC’s move, asserting it was politically biased. In its statement, Israel justified its military actions as self-defense following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks, which it called “the largest massacre of the Jewish people since the Holocaust.” Netanyahu vowed to continue military operations against Hamas and what he described as the “Iranian axis of terror.”

The United States also rejected the ICC’s decision. President Joe Biden called it “outrageous,” reiterating unwavering US support for Israel. Similarly, Argentina criticized the ruling, emphasizing Israel’s legitimate right to defend itself.

In contrast, European nations such as Spain, Sweden, and Italy stated they respect the ICC’s decision, with EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell calling it “a decision of justice, not politics.”

Allegations and Implications

The ICC accuses Netanyahu and Gallant of crimes such as starvation as a method of warfare and targeting civilian populations. Although Israel and the US do not recognize the ICC’s jurisdiction, the court relies on its 124 member states under the Rome Statute to enforce its rulings.

The warrants raise questions about future travel risks for the accused, as member states are obligated to detain ICC targets. The court’s action reflects growing scrutiny of the Gaza war, though enforcement remains uncertain amidst geopolitical divisions.

ICC Issues Arrest Warrants For Netanyahu And Gallant Over Gaza War Crimes

November 21, 2024, 5:52 pm

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant in connection with alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity during the ongoing conflict in Gaza. The ICC announced on Thursday, November 21, that it had found reasonable grounds to believe that both Netanyahu and Gallant bear criminal responsibility for war crimes committed during the Israel-Hamas War.

The charges against the two Israeli leaders include accusations of using starvation as a method of warfare, alongside crimes against humanity such as murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts. According to the ICC, Netanyahu and Gallant are alleged to have co-perpetrated these crimes with others involved in the conflict.

The arrest warrants further intensify international scrutiny of Israel’s military actions in Gaza, as the war continues to result in significant civilian casualties. The move also highlights the growing international pressure on Israel regarding its military strategy, especially its impact on Palestinian civilians. The Israeli government has not yet responded to the ICC’s decision, and it remains unclear whether Netanyahu and Gallant will face arrest.

Putin’s Mongolia Visit Sparks Debate Over ICC Obligations And Geopolitical Strains

September 3, 2024, 2:41 pm

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s visit to Mongolia has stirred controversy, as Ulaanbaatar faces scrutiny over its obligations under international law. Arriving on September 2, 2024, Putin’s presence in Mongolia—a country bound by an active arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court (ICC)—has raised concerns about Mongolia’s compliance with the Rome Statute.

Mongolia’s ICC Obligations

Under the Rome Statute, member states, including Mongolia, are required to arrest individuals indicted by the ICC. In March 2023, the ICC issued a warrant for Putin, accusing him of war crimes related to the deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia. This warrant marks a historic move, targeting a sitting leader of one of the five permanent UN Security Council members. Mongolia’s decision to host Putin is thus seen as a significant legal and diplomatic dilemma.

Responses and Reactions

Ukrainian officials and international human rights groups have expressed disappointment. Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Heorhiy Tykhyi criticized Mongolia’s actions as a blow to the ICC, while Amnesty International’s Altantuya Batdorj warned that providing refuge to Putin could imply complicity in serious crimes. Despite these concerns, there is no indication that Mongolia intends to detain the Russian leader.

Purpose of Putin’s Visit

Putin’s visit coincides with the 85th anniversary of the Battle of Khalkhin Gol and the 75th anniversary of Mongolia’s national railway operator, a key project involving Russia. The visit also ties into Russia’s broader strategy to bolster energy ties with China through the proposed Power of Siberia 2 pipeline.

Mongolia’s Geopolitical Position

Mongolia’s reliance on Russia for energy and infrastructure, coupled with its strategic location between Russia and China, complicates its foreign policy. The country’s “Third Neighbour” policy aims to balance relations with external powers, but hosting Putin may strain its Western partnerships and impact its international standing.

Putin’s visit underscores Mongolia’s challenging position at the crossroads of international obligations and geopolitical dependencies. The situation highlights the limitations of the ICC’s enforcement capabilities and raises questions about Mongolia’s role in international justice and diplomacy.

UK Halts Efforts To Challenge ICC Jurisdiction Over Arrest Warrants For Israeli Leaders

July 26, 2024, 5:48 pm

United Kingdom has decided not to pursue efforts to question the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) jurisdiction to issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Yoav Gallant. This decision comes after the ICC’s prosecutor requested warrants in May for Netanyahu, Gallant, and three Hamas leaders over alleged war crimes.

In June, court documents revealed that the UK, an ICC member state, sought to provide written observations on whether “the court can exercise jurisdiction over Israeli nationals, in circumstances where Palestine cannot exercise criminal jurisdiction over Israeli nationals under the Oslo Accords.” However, the new Labour government, elected in July, has decided not to proceed with the proposal.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s spokesperson stated, “On the ICC submission… I can confirm the government will not be pursuing (the proposal) in line with our long-standing position that this is a matter for the court to decide on.”

The ICC, the world’s first permanent international war crimes court, steps in only when a state is unwilling or unable to prosecute war crimes itself. Israel, supported by its main ally, the United States, is not a member of the ICC, and has stated that alleged war crimes in Gaza are being investigated domestically.

Member states of the ICC are obliged to arrest individuals with warrants on their territory, but past cases, such as that of Sudanese former President Omar Bashir, have shown that compliance is not always guaranteed. If warrants are issued against Israeli leaders, many European Union countries, which are ICC members, could face significant diplomatic challenges.

Former Islamic Police Chief al-Hassan Ag Abdoul Aziz Convicted By ICC In Mali

July 2, 2024, 6:10 pm

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has convicted al-Hassan ag Abdoul Aziz ag Mohamed ag Mahmoud, the former head of the Islamic police in Mali’s. In the historic city of Timbuktu, for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Prosecutors accused Hassan of leading a “reign of terror” in Timbuktu after it was overrun in 2012 by the al-Qaeda-linked Ansar Dine group. He was a senior member of the Islamic police, recruited by al-Qaeda leaders.

Hassan, who remained emotionless as the verdict was read out in The Hague, Netherlands, was acquitted on charges linked to rape, sexual slavery, and imposing forced marriages on women. The ICC noted that 2,196 victims participated in the trial proceedings, with 7,896 documents recorded and 13,275 items of evidence submitted over 195 hearings.

Hassan was handed over to the ICC in 2018 by Malian authorities, five years after French troops helped liberate Timbuktu from the jihadists. Ansar Dine was one of several Islamist militant groups that exploited an ethnic Tuareg uprising to take over cities in northern Mali.

As police chief, Hassan oversaw punishments such as public amputations and the flogging of residents, including children.

“Al Hassan has been found guilty by majority decision of war crimes and crimes against humanity, including torture, cruel treatment, and outrages upon personal dignity, for the public flogging of 13 members of the population of Timbuktu,” Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua stated, according to Reuters.

“The inhabitants had no other choice but to adapt their lives and lifestyles to conform to the interpretation of Islamic Sharia law imposed on them by the force of arms,” Judge Mindua added, as reported by AFP.

Hassan was also involved in interrogations where torture was used to extract confessions, the judge noted. The prosecution case included testimony from Dédéou Maiga, who was accused of petty theft and arrested by Hassan. He was tied to a chair in public, and his hand was amputated and died in 2017.

The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) welcomed the judgment but expressed disappointment that Hassan was acquitted of the gender-based crimes.

“This verdict represents an important step for the victims in their quest for justice in relation to international crimes committed in Mali in 2012,” said FIDH Secretary General Drissa Traoré.

One survivor expressed dismay at the outcome. “I am partly disappointed by this verdict which does not take into account the rapes, let alone the sexual slavery, the suffering that I and other women in Timbuktu have suffered with the complicity of Al Hassan,” she said.

In a related case, another Islamist militant leader, Ahmad al-Faqi al-Mahdi, was sentenced to nine years in jail in 2016 for destroying ancient shrines in Timbuktu. Mahdi admitted to leading rebel forces that destroyed historic mausoleums at the World Heritage site in 2012.

Mossad chief ‘threatened’ ICC prosecutor over war crimes case against Israel

May 31, 2024, 6:16 pm

The former chief of Israeli intelligence agency Mossad threatened the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) chief prosecutor to try to get a 2021 war crimes probe dropped. A report by the Guardian stated that Yossi Cohen threatened the ICC’s former prosecutor Fatou Bensouda in a series of secret meetings. It is pertinent to note that the report tallies with others suggesting Israel and its main Western allies have sought to pressure international justice bodies.

Last week, Bensouda’s successor and incumbent chief prosecutor at ICC Karim Khan, applied for an arrest warrant for Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu based on that probe launched in 2021. Khan announced his office had “reasonable grounds” to believe that Netanyahu and Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant bear “criminal responsibility” for “war crimes and crimes against humanity”.

Cohen used ‘despicable tactics’: Report

According to the report, Cohen employed “despicable tactics” against Bensouda in a failed attempt to intimidate and influence her. Accounts shared with ICC officials allege that he told her: “You should help us and let us take care of you. You don’t want to be getting into things that could compromise your security or that of your family.” It is noteworthy that Israel is not a member of the ICC and does not recognize its jurisdiction.

US Lawmakers Consider Sanctions Against ICC Over Netanyahu Arrest Warrant

May 21, 2024, 12:21 pm

United States lawmakers are considering imposing sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) if it proceeds with issuing an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, according to US House Speaker Mike Johnson.

“In the absence of leadership from the White House, Congress is reviewing all options, including sanctions, to punish the ICC and ensure its leadership faces consequences if they proceed. If the ICC is allowed to threaten Israeli leaders, ours could be next,” Johnson said in a statement on Monday.

He further criticized the ICC, stating, “The ICC has no authority over Israel or the United States, and today’s baseless and illegitimate decision should face global condemnation.”

The controversy follows ICC chief prosecutor Karim A. A. Khan’s announcement on May 20 of arrest warrant applications against Netanyahu and Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, as well as Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar, Mohammed Deif, and Ismail Haniyeh for alleged crimes against humanity during Israel’s seven-month-old war against Hamas in Gaza.

Republican lawmakers have been vocal in their opposition, with House Republican Conference Chair Elise Stefanik telling the New York Post, “The ICC is an illegitimate court that equivocates a peaceful nation protecting its right to exist with radical terror groups that commit genocide.” Stefanik had met with Netanyahu on Monday morning as the warrants were announced.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries also condemned the warrants, calling them “shameful and unserious.”

Earlier this month, a Texas Representative introduced the Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act to revoke visas for ICC officials investigating or prosecuting US officials or American allies.

Human rights attorney Amal Clooney, who advised the ICC prosecutor, explained her involvement, stating, “I served on this panel because I believe in the rule of law and the need to protect civilian lives. The law that protects civilians in war was developed more than 100 years ago and it applies in every country in the world regardless of the reasons for a conflict,” in a statement on the Clooney Foundation for Justice website.

US President Joe Biden termed the ICC prosecutor’s application for arrest warrants as “outrageous,” asserting that the US “will always stand with Israel against threats to its security.”

Secretary of State Antony Blinken also rejected the ICC Prosecutor’s equivalence between Israel and Hamas, warning that the announcement could jeopardize negotiations on a hostage deal and ceasefire. He emphasized that the United States has been clear that the ICC has no jurisdiction over this matter and noted that the ICC Prosecutor was scheduled to visit Israel next week to discuss the investigation with the Israeli Government.

In response to the announcement, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu called the warrant “absurd and false,” stating it targets not only him and the defense minister but also the entire State of Israel and its soldiers who are “fighting with supreme heroism against the vile Hamas murderers.” This statement was reported by the Times of Israel.

US Lawmakers Contemplates Sanctions On ICC Over Netanyahu Arrest Warrant

May 21, 2024, 11:21 am

In a significant development in Israel-Hamas war, the American lawmakers are now thinking of imposing sanctions on International Criminal Court (ICC), if it issues arrest warrant on Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, announced US House Speaker Mike Johnson.

Issuing the statement at a local time, US House speaker said

Later, he also announced, that ICC possess no authority over Israel and United States. Also added, these baseless and illegitimate decision deserves global condemnation.

Earlier, ICC Chief prosecutor Karim A A Khan, issued warrant applications against both Netanyahu and Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, alongside Hamas’s top leaders- Yahya Sinwar, Mohammed Deif, and Ismail Haniyeh for committing crimes against humanity during Israel’s seven-month war against Hamas in Gaza.

Reacting to the announcement, Israel PM Netanyahu declared, this warrant is not just absurd and false, but it is also against the entire state of Israel.

US Reaction To ICC’s Announcement

Later, the republican lawmakers called for Biden to impose sanctions on ICC.

Both Secretary of state Antony Blinken and US president Joe Biden condemned the issued warrant. Even though, the reason gave by them were different.

While US president Joe Biden said that this warrant is outrageous. However, Antony Blinken gave a very interesting reasoning, saying this announcement has the potential to jeopardize negotiations on hostage deal and ceasefire.

However, ironically, it was the wife of Hollywood actor George Clooney, who advised ICC chief prosecutor Khan. Implying, the thin line between film industry and Politics.

When being why she advised the ICC Chief, she said the following,

“I served on this panel because I believe in the rule of law and the need to protect civilian lives. The law that protects civilians in war was developed more than 100 years ago and it applies in every country in the world regardless of the reasons for a conflict.” said the statement issues by Clooney Foundation for Justice.