Latest Interim Bail News | Top Interim Bail News Headlines Today | Today India news | Breaking Interim Bail News Today | English Interim Bail News Headlines - TheDailyGuardian

Allu Arjun Granted Interim Bail, High Court Affirms Actor’s Right To Life

December 13, 2024, 6:14 pm

Telugu actor Allu Arjun was granted interim bail for four weeks by the Telangana High Court on Friday in connection with the stampede that occurred during the premiere of his film Pushpa 2: The Rule in Hyderabad. The court emphasized that Allu Arjun, like any citizen, is entitled to life and liberty, regardless of his profession.

The decision followed a whirlwind of events, beginning with Allu Arjun’s arrest at his residence, after which a lower court had ordered his 14-day judicial custody. The stampede on December 4 at Sandhya Theatre resulted in the death of a 39-year-old woman and injuries to her minor son.

Also Read: “Allu Arjun has nothing to do with the stampede…”Husband of Woman Killed in Stampede Willing to Drop Case

Justice Juvvadi Sridevi stated that the actor should not be held primarily responsible for the incident, as he had merely attended the film’s premiere. “Saying that he is an actor, he cannot be deprived of his right. As a citizen of this earth, he too has the right to life and liberty,” the court remarked, expressing sympathy for the victim’s family.

The court also noted that Sandhya Theatre had requested police security due to the presence of Allu Arjun and co-star Rashmika Mandhana. It dismissed the Telangana government’s argument that Arjun should have known such an incident might occur. “Is he responsible for the tragedy that happened? What knowledge did he have? He has taken permission,” the court stated.

Actor Darshan Granted 6-Week Interim Bail for Medical Treatment

October 30, 2024, 11:13 am

Actor Darshan, arrested on June 11 along with Pavithra Gowda and 15 others in connection with the alleged torture and murder of his fan Renukaswamy, has been granted six weeks of interim bail by the Karnataka High Court for medical reasons. The actor, aged 47, sought bail citing numbness in both feet and a need for surgery.

Justice S Vishwajith Shetty stipulated that Darshan must surrender his passport and provide his chosen hospital’s treatment details within seven days. Earlier, his lawyer requested that Darshan undergo the surgery at a private hospital in Mysuru, but the public prosecutor objected, arguing that the surgery could be performed at a government facility and that Darshan’s medical records lacked a clear hospitalization timeframe.

The case stems from the alleged killing of Renukaswamy, 33, whose body was discovered on June 9 near a stormwater drain in Bengaluru. Police reports state that Renukaswamy had allegedly sent obscene messages to Gowda, sparking Darshan’s anger, which reportedly led to the tragic incident.

UPSC Aspirants’ Death Case: Delhi HC Grants Interim Bail to 4 Basement Co-Owners, Orders Rs 5 Crore Deposit

September 13, 2024, 11:52 pm

The Delhi High Court on Friday granted interim bail to four co-owners of a basement in Old Rajinder Nagar, linked to the tragic deaths of three IAS aspirants. The bail is valid until January 30, 2025. Justice DK Sharma, who presided over the case, also directed the co-owners to deposit Rs 5 crore to the Red Cross Society and requested the Lieutenant Governor (LG) of Delhi to form a committee to regulate coaching centers operating in unsanctioned basements.

Co-Owners Held Liable for Unlawful Use of Basement

Justice Sharma remarked that the actions of the co-owners were “unpardonable” and driven by “greed.” The court’s decision follows a CBI investigation revealing that the basement was designated solely for storage but was unlawfully used as a coaching center, endangering lives. The illegal use of the basement was a direct factor in the tragic incident, according to the court.

Delhi High Court Orders Further Investigation

On Thursday, the Delhi High Court also ordered the CBI to submit a status report addressing the causes of waterlogging in the area, along with rainfall data from the day of the incident. The CBI claimed that the co-owners were fully aware of the risks associated with using the basement as a classroom, particularly given prior warnings from local residents.

Co-Owners’ Plea for Bail Cites “Act of God”

Despite the trial court denying their earlier bail plea, the co-owners approached the Delhi High Court, arguing that they were not named in the FIR and had cooperated fully with the investigation. They also asserted that the incident was caused by heavy rain, labeling it an “act of God,” and partially blamed the civic authorities for the area’s faulty sewer system.

The co-owners’ defense further contended that vicarious liability does not apply in this case, emphasizing that criminal responsibility should lie only with those directly involved in the criminal act.

Also read:

CBI Accuses Rau’s IAS Study Circle Owner of Violating Building Norms; Six Taken into Custody After Deaths of Three UPSC Aspirants</strong>

Delhi UPSC Aspirants’ Deaths: Key Demands Of Hunger Strike Protesters

Accountability For The UPSC’s ASPIRANTS’ DEATH Must Be Fixed

High Court Requests LG to Form Committee on Basement Coaching Centers

In a broader ruling, the court urged the Lieutenant Governor to establish a committee supervised by a retired High Court judge to ensure that no coaching centers operate in basements without proper authorization across Delhi.

No Immediate Bail For Arvind Kejriwal: Supreme Court Notice To CBI

August 14, 2024, 12:20 pm

In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India has refused to grant interim bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in connection with a corruption case involving the alleged excise policy scam. The bench, consisting of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan, issued a notice to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in response to Kejriwal’s challenge against the Delhi High Court’s decision to uphold his arrest.

Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, representing Kejriwal, had requested interim bail, but the court stated, “We are not granting any interim bail. We will issue notice.” The Supreme Court has scheduled the next hearing for August 23.

On August 5, the Delhi High Court had upheld Kejriwal’s arrest, deeming it legal and finding no evidence of malice in the CBI’s actions. The court acknowledged the CBI’s argument that Kejriwal’s position might have influenced witnesses, delaying their testimonies until after his arrest.

The controversy centers around the excise policy, which was scrapped in 2022 following a CBI investigation initiated by the Delhi Lieutenant Governor. The probe scrutinized alleged irregularities and corruption in the formulation and implementation of the policy. The CBI and Enforcement Directorate (ED) have alleged that the policy’s modification involved irregularities and undue benefits granted to license holders.

Delhi Court Notifies Enforcement Directorate On Arvind Kejriwal’s Bail Pleas

May 30, 2024, 2:44 pm

Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Court has sent a notification to the Enforcement Directorate regarding the interim and regular bail pleas filed by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. These bail requests are set to be reviewed on June 1 at 2 pm.

Earlier, the Supreme Court’s registry declined to list Kejriwal’s plea seeking an extension of interim bail, stating that the lower court was available for his appeal. As the court had not yet delivered its verdict on Kejriwal’s plea challenging his arrest, the registry clarified that his petition for extending interim bail was separate from the main case.

In response, Kejriwal submitted a fresh plea to the Supreme Court, urging a seven-day extension of his interim bail and requesting an urgent hearing before a vacation bench on May 28. Currently in recess, the Supreme Court is not in regular session.

Given relief by the court until June 1 to campaign for the Lok Sabha elections and surrender the following day, Kejriwal is seeking an extension of interim bail by a week. Health concerns, including issues with kidney function and significant weight loss, form the basis of Kejriwal’s appeal.

Kejriwal’s party highlighted his declining health, noting a weight loss of 7 kg since his arrest and elevated ketone levels, indicating potential symptoms of a serious illness.

While the Supreme Court bench reserved its decision on the plea challenging his arrest, it permitted Kejriwal to seek bail from the trial court.

Delhi Waqf Board Scandal: Accused Appeals Bail For Mother’s Hospitalization

May 29, 2024, 6:09 pm

Kausar Imam Siddiqui, who is facing charges in a Delhi Waqf Board money laundering case, has requested a 30-day interim bail citing his mother’s hospitalization and the need to provide educational support to his children.

Special Judge Rakesh Syal has granted the Enforcement Directorate (ED) time to respond to this application, with the decision made on Wednesday.

Siddiqui, represented by advocate Hemant Shah, has applied, whereas the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has filed a charge sheet against four individuals and a company in this case. A previous notice had been issued regarding this matter, and it is now scheduled for a hearing on June 3. It is stated that his mother is ill and needs hospitalization.

ED has filed charges against four individuals: Zeeshan Haider, his partnership firm Sky Power, Javed Imam Siddiqui, Dawood Nasir, and Kausar Imam Siddiqui. It accused them of money laundering in connection with the purchase and sale of property valued at Rs. 36 crores, allegedly orchestrated by AAP MLA Amanat Ullah Khan. Reportedly, the property was bought with illicit funds, and Amanat Ullah Khan personally delivered Rs. 8 crores in cash.

In response to a query about Amanat Ullah Khan’s involvement, the ED’s counsel stated that the investigation concerning the roles of other accused individuals is still ongoing.

Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Manish Jain presented allegations of irregularities in the Delhi Waqf Board, detailing the involvement of the main accused, Amanat Ullah, in corrupt practices. The charges include misappropriation and siphoning of funds, with Rs. 100 crore worth of property misappropriated, and jobs provided improperly.

It was submitted that the ED, during its PMLA investigation, considered FIRs filed earlier by the CBI, ACB, and Delhi Police. The Anti-Corruption Bureau requested a PMLA investigation against MLA and former chairperson Amanat Ullah Khan, alleging properties were made in Delhi, Telangana, and Uttarakhand with ill-gotten money.

The Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) carried out searches at properties owned and controlled by Hamid Ali Khan and Kausar Imam Siddiqui, uncovering incriminating evidence and illegal weapons. Additionally, three diaries were found during the searches, which were reportedly maintained by Kausar Imam Siddiqui, according to the agency.

Amit Shah Questions Kejriwal’s Interim Bail As Perceived Special Treatment

May 15, 2024, 6:51 pm

Union Home Minister Amit Shah expressed apprehensions regarding the Supreme Court’s decision to grant interim bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in the excise policy case, suggesting that many perceive it as special treatment. In an exclusive interview with ANI, Shah stated that the judgment was not routine and raised concerns about the perception of preferential treatment.

Addressing Kejriwal’s involvement in political campaigns for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, Shah took a swipe at the Delhi Chief Minister, referencing an ongoing issue involving an alleged assault by one of Kejriwal’s aides. He suggested waiting until the resolution of this matter before assessing Kejriwal’s political activities.

Responding to Kejriwal’s claims about surveillance in Tihar jail, Shah dismissed them, highlighting that the jail administration falls under the purview of the Delhi government, not the Home Ministry.

Kejriwal’s interim bail, granted by the Supreme Court on May 10 in a money laundering case linked to Delhi’s excise policy, allows him to participate in election campaigning until June 1. However, he must surrender to jail authorities on June 2 and is prohibited from serving as Chief Minister during this period.

Regarding Kejriwal’s recent announcement of ten guarantees to the people, Shah downplayed their significance, questioning the feasibility of such promises given the AAP’s limited electoral presence. He emphasized Prime Minister Modi’s continued leadership beyond 2029, refuting Kejriwal’s allegations of impending leadership changes within the BJP post-elections.

As the Lok Sabha polls progress, with voting in Delhi scheduled for May 25, the AAP and the Congress are contesting in alliance, with the AAP competing in four seats and the Congress in three.

Emotional Homecoming: Arvind Kejriwal Welcomed with Garlands, Aarti and Hugs After 50 Days in Jail

May 10, 2024, 11:05 pm

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has returned home today following the Supreme Court’s decision to grant him interim bail until June 1. Mr Kejriwal was taken into custody by the Enforcement Directorate on March 21 in connection with the Excise Policy Case.

At approximately 7 pm today, after 50 days in detention, the Delhi Chief Minister emerged from jail, greeted by a large crowd of Aam Aadmi Party supporters outside Tihar Jail. Upon his arrival home, Mr Kejriwal received a warm welcome from AAP MP Sanjay Singh, who embraced him as soon as he stepped out of the car.

Inside, Arvind Kejriwal was greeted by his parents and wife with traditional aarti and garlands. His mother stood at the door, holding a garland to welcome her son, whom she greeted with a hug and blessings. Beside her, Mr Kejriwal’s father also embraced his son, patting his back affectionately.

The release of the AAP chief not only energizes his party but also the INDI alliance. Sunita Kejriwal, Arvind Kejriwal’s wife, recognized as AAP’s key campaigner in Gujarat and Delhi for the Lok Sabha elections, welcomed her husband home by garlanding him.

Arvind Kejriwal outlined his schedule for the first half of Saturday, including a visit to a Hanuman temple in New Delhi’s Connaught Place at 11 am, followed by a press conference at the AAP office at 1 pm.

JDS Leader HD Revanna Denied Bail In Kidnapping Case

May 5, 2024, 12:23 pm

A special court on Saturday declined to provide anticipatory interim bail to Janta Dal (Secular) leader HD Revanna, who is accused of kidnapping a woman.

Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge Santhosh Gajanan Bhat dismissed Revanna’s plea for interim bail in a case filed against him under sections 364 (A), 365, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The court said, “The complainant’s mother who is also the victim is yet to be traced and at this juncture, it would not be appropriate to discuss invocation about Sec.364-A of IPC, since the court is only considering the interim bail application.”

According to the prosecution’s account, a written report was submitted to the K.R. Nagara Police Station on May 2, 2024, around 9:00 p.m. The complainant reported that his mother had been employed in the residence of accused No.1 for approximately six years but had recently quit and started working as a daily wage laborer in their village.

The report mentioned that about 3 to 4 days before the Parliamentary Elections, accused No.2, Satish Babanna, who was acquainted with them, visited their residence and requested the complainant’s mother to accompany him. She returned home on the day of the parliamentary election. Additionally, it was stated that on April 29, 2024, around 9:00 p.m., the same incident occurred.

The report indicated that accused No.2, Satish Babanna, had visited their residence and requested the complainant’s mother to accompany him, allegedly as instructed by accused No.1, H.D. Revanna.

The complainant became aware of a viral video circulating concerning the alleged sexual assault on his mother through a friend. When he asked accused No.2, Satish Babanna, to return his mother, he refused. Concerned for her safety and well-being, the complainant lodged a complaint on May 2, 2024.

The applicant contended that he is an innocent and law-abiding citizen, and asserted that attempts were made to falsely implicate him. The complaint, according to the argument, does not in any way link the petitioner to the alleged offenses. It was further stated that the complaint appears to have been filed with a hidden agenda by political adversaries to damage his reputation in society.

The defense argued that the petitioner holds a prominent position in his constituency and had organized a campaign program where his son was a candidate for the upcoming Lok Sabha Elections 2024. The false accusations against his son were purportedly made to undermine his chances in the election, and now the petitioner is being targeted to settle political scores.

The public prosecutor opposed the plea, arguing that the case registered against the petitioner is not fabricated. Instead, it has links to sexual assault and misconduct reportedly committed by his son, Prajwal Revanna, who allegedly recorded obscene acts for repeated exploitation.

Moreover, it was asserted that the registered case serves as an illustration of how the petitioner and others may resort to any means to manipulate the legal system and interfere with the investigation.

The court observed that the victim of the alleged offense was abducted by accused No.2 at the direction of accused No.1, i.e., the petitioner. Additionally, the investigating officers were still in the process of locating the victim and recording statements from various witnesses related to the case.

The court said “The court has to look into the seriousness of the allegations leveled and also with all facts and circumstances of the case.Since the victim is yet to be traced, it would not be appropriate to admit the petitioner herein on interim anticipatory bail. However, at this juncture, it is made clear that the observations made supra are not with respect to the merits or demerits of the case.”

Consequently, the application was dismissed.

SC grants bail to Vernon Gonsalves, Arun Ferreira in Bhima Koregaon case

July 28, 2023, 4:27 pm

The Supreme Court granted bail on Friday to Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira, who have been imprisoned since August 2018.

A bench led by Justices Aniruddha Bose and Sudhanshu Dhulia granted bail to Gonsalves and Ferreira, citing the fact that they had been detained for nearly five years.

“Considering the fact that almost five years have elapsed, we are satisfied they have made out a case for bail,” they said.

In addition, the order stated, “The allegations are serious, no doubt, but for that reason alone, bail cannot be denied to them.”