Latest India Pakistan conflict News | Top India Pakistan conflict News Headlines Today | Today India news | Breaking India Pakistan conflict News Today | English India Pakistan conflict News Headlines - TheDailyGuardian

Asim Munir Heckled in US as Protesters Chant ‘Shame, Shame’ | Watch

June 17, 2025, 7:34 pm

Asim Munir faces fresh controversy as his visit to Washington takes a dramatic turn, with protesters gathering outside his hotel and shouting accusations that have now sparked a viral uproar online. The video, shot by an onlooker, shows Munir’s convoy arriving while angry voices fill the air with sharp insults and heated slogans.

The rare confrontation, unfolding far from home, hints at growing tensions surrounding Pakistan’s most powerful military figure, tensions fueled by recent political unrest and simmering international criticism.

Protesters Shout Accusations Against Asim Munir

The video shows a group of protesters waiting for Asim Munir’s convoy to arrive at the Washington hotel. One protester said, “We are here to welcome Asim Munir,” while holding a screen that reads “Mass Murderer.” The protesters shout “Shame, shame, shame,” and demand civilian rule in Pakistan. Using harsh language, they call him a “b*****d” and repeat the word “Geedar” to call him a coward.

“Aa gaya Haramzada…Asim Munir shame on you”

Pak Army Chief Asim Munir gets a warm welcome by Pakistanis 😂 pic.twitter.com/v21EIk1yO4

— BALA (@erbmjha) June 17, 2025

The protesters asserted their right to protest on public property when they were confronted by the security officers. This growing resentment seen among the Pakistanis living abroad blames Munir for controlling Pakistan’s politics, suppressing opposing and dissenting views, and destroying the democratic system of their home country.

India Conflict Adds Pressure

Asim Munir’s recent promotion to Field Marshal, therefore, adds more pressure to the already tense situation. Following a terror attack in Pahalgam, India immediately launched strong attacks on terrorist bases in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.

Consequently, these strikes damaged Pakistan’s military air bases deeply inside the country, exposing vulnerabilities. Moreover, India has also suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, which has further increased the tensions.

In response to this escalation, Munir has firmly declared that Pakistan would never compromise on water rights, calling it a “red line” for the 240 million people of Pakistan. Meanwhile, many people continue to demand accountability and openly protest his leadership both at home and across international spheres.

Pakistan Faces 15% Indus Water Flow Drop as India Halts Treaty, Dams Near Depletion

June 8, 2025, 11:29 am

Pakistan is experiencing a critical water crisis due to the restriction of river flow by India under the Indus Waters Treaty, resulting in a 15% decline in Indus Basin water flow. Statistics viewed by CNN-News18 indicate that on June 5, water discharge fell to 1.24 lakh cusecs in Pakistan’s Punjab from 1.44 lakh cusecs last year on the same day.

Reservoir levels at Pakistan’s major dams have dropped perilously low to their dead level, signaling alarm for the Kharif season. The government of Pakistan predicts a probable 21% water shortage and has accused India of conducting “water war.”

Dams Near Dead Levels

Recent statistics show a critical condition in Pakistan’s dams. Tarbela Dam on the Indus in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa stands at 1,465 metres, barely above its dead level of 1,402 metres. Chasma Dam in Punjab is at 644 metres, just six metres from its 638-metre dead mark.

Mangla Dam on the Jhelum in Mirpur has also dropped to 1,163 metres, uncomfortably close to its dead level of 1,050 metres. Water cannot drain by gravity below the threshold, making the reservoirs nearly useless for agriculture.

Punjab’s Kharif Season under Threat

A senior government official told CNN-News18 that the Kharif season, running from June to September, now faces a major threat. Since rainfall has not yet arrived and India has cut water supplies, crops across Pakistan’s Punjab face serious risk.

Chenab’s average discharge in Marala in Sialkot went from 26,645 cusecs on May 28 down to as little as 3,064 cusecs by June 5. The officials are concerned that the deficit could ruin early planting and irrigation phases.

Complementing the water crisis, Pakistan is expecting a severe heatwave from June 8. Day temperatures are expected to climb 5 to 7°C over average in central and upper Punjab, Islamabad, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Kashmir, and Gilgit-Baltistan. The heatwave may increase water consumption, further straining Pakistan’s weak reserves.

Treaty Dispute Intensifies

Tensions have escalated since India decided to leave the Indus Waters Treaty on hold. New Delhi states that it will no longer endure both “blood and water” to flow towards Pakistan. PM Narendra Modi, who spoke on May 27 in Gujarat, justified the decision. He asserted that India was entitled to its share of water and blamed previous governments for their lack of vigilance.

PM Modi also condemned the restriction on desilting and dam gate operations in Jammu and Kashmir, saying the system took available reservoir capacity down from 100% to just 2-3%.

Pakistan Calls It “Act of War”

Pakistan has reacted with diplomatic indignation, dispatching four letters requiring India to reconsider its move. It blamed India for violating international norms and precipitating a crisis by obstructing supplies through the Chenab River. Authorities state that future clashes may occur over water if the current stalemate persists.

India and Pakistan agreed to the Indus Waters Treaty in 1960 with the World Bank as mediator. It allocated India the right over the eastern rivers—Beas, Ravi, and Sutlej—and Pakistan the right over the western rivers—Indus, Chenab, and Jhelum. Each country had rights to limited use of the other’s rivers for hydropower and agriculture.

Now, the treaty is yet another point of contention in a tense bilateral relationship, with Pakistan observing its reservoirs shrink and crops dwindle.

Asaduddin Owaisi Demands Pakistan’s Return to FATF Grey List in Algeria | Watch

June 1, 2025, 1:53 pm

AsaduddinIndia has renewed its diplomatic attack on Pakistan, demanding its re-inclusion in the FATF Grey List. AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi, in an all-party outreach in Algeria, revealed the extent of Pakistan’s terror connections. He referred to the instance of Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, the Lashkar-e-Taiba leader, who gave birth to a child while behind bars, on terror charges.

Asaduddin Owaisi, who was accompanying a delegation led by BJP lawmaker Baijayant Panda, spoke to the Indian community in Algeria. He berated Pakistan’s response to terrorism and advocated for more forceful international action.

‘Terrorist Became a Father in Jail’

Asaduddin Owaisi narrated a shocking account of Lakhvi’s life in Pakistani custody. “There was this one terrorist called Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi. No country in the world would allow this. He became a father to a son while sitting in prison,” Owaisi said. He pointed out that Pakistan only acted on Lakhvi’s case when international pressure forced its hand—specifically when it landed on the FATF Grey List.

#WATCH | Algiers, Algeria | AIMIM chief and MP Asaduddin Owaisi says, “There was this one terrorist called Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi – no country in the world would allow a terrorist who’s facing a terror charge. He became a father to a son while sitting in prison. The trial… pic.twitter.com/Gd5whrzW13

— ANI (@ANI) May 31, 2025

Owaisi warned the world: “It’s not a South Asian question. We are the fourth-largest economy. What will happen if this terror goes elsewhere?” He asked world leaders to act. “It is in the interest of world peace to control Pakistan… It has to be brought back in the FATF Grey List.”

Global Outreach After ‘Operation Sindoor’

Asaduddin Owaisi’s remarks align with India’s renewed push against cross-border terror. After launching Operation Sindoor on May 7, India has expanded diplomatic outreach to 33 countries. Seven all-party delegations actively highlight Pakistan’s terror sponsorship following the Pahalgam attack that killed 26.

The campaign is being supported by the Ministry of External Affairs at senior-level talks. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri recently met with U.S. officials in Washington to further economic and financial cooperation. The coordination for the FATF meeting in June was also discussed during the talks.

FATF in Focus Again

India is set to make a robust case before FATF, claiming Pakistan continues to provide safe haven and support to terrorists. While Pakistan moved out of the FATF Grey List in 2022, New Delhi feels things have not changed. The Lakhvi saga reinforces that line of thinking.

India is once again mobilizing the world against terrorism. It now wants FATF to take action, and urgently.

India Hits Back at Pakistan Over Indus Treaty at UN, Says ‘Goodwill Has Eroded’

June 1, 2025, 12:37 pm

In India’s first ever UN conference on glaciers held in Dushanbe, India vehemently countered Pakistan’s claims of New Delhi violating the Indus Waters Treaty. Rather, India accused Pakistan’s Islamabad of treaty violations by nurturing cross-border terror.

India’s argument was presented by the Minister of State for Environment Kirti Vardhan Singh on Friday, advocating a re-examination of the treaty obligations in light of changed circumstances and the behavior of Pakistan.

India Refutes Pakistan’s Charges

In the plenary session, Kirti Vardhan Singh categorically ruled out allegations of India violating the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty. He accused Pakistan of abusing the UN platform and raising irrelevant references. India criticized those actions and also found them unacceptable, he said.

Kirt Vardhan Singh explained that the treaty was signed in a spirit of goodwill. But that spirit, he noted, has eroded. “Pakistan, which itself violates the treaty, should desist from blaming the breach of the treaty on India,” he said. He added that terrorism from across the border directly impacts the fair implementation of the agreement.

Treaty Obstructed by Terrorism

He asserted that cross-border terrorism disrupts the facility of using treaty provisions. India feels the disruption warrants the reconsideration of treaty obligations. He contended that basic changes have occurred since signing the treaty.

This comment was a direct rebuttal of Pakistan’s assertions during the day. PM Shehbaz Sharif, who addressed the same summit, echoed the military’s assertion that India had crossed a “red line” by placing the treaty in abeyance.

Background behind India’s Action

Indus Waters Treaty was suspended following the April 22 terror attack at Pahalgam in Kashmir, which took 26 tourists’ lives. The move came amid escalating tensions and blame on Pakistan for sheltering terrorists.

PM Sharif criticized India for playing with millions of lives for political purposes. Pakistani newspaper Dawn reported him as saying India’s action was “deeply regrettable.”

The recent exchange at the UN spotlights the rising pressure on the Indus Waters Treaty. With both countries accusing one another of violations, the future of the decades-old water-sharing arrangement appears bleaker than ever. India has now made it explicit that any sincere implementation of the treaty has to accompany an end to terrorism.

Shashi Tharoor Sends Strong Message to Pakistan: ‘Can’t Just Walk Across and Kill’

May 26, 2025, 12:58 pm

India is sending a strong message to Pakistan and the rest of the world: terror will not be tolerated any longer. Congress Member of Parliament Shashi Tharoor, who is leading an all-party parliamentary delegation across the North American continents, told a crowd in New York that no one should believe that they can “Just walk across the border and kill Indian citizens with impunity.” The Indian Consulate General hosted an interactive session during which the remarks were made.

The trip is a component of India’s international diplomatic endeavor to defend its military response through Operation Sindoor and to refute Pakistan’s narrative in the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack.

India’s Firm Warning to Pakistan

Shashi Tharoor established a new foundation for India’s security posture. He said Pakistan must realize that India will no longer tolerate assaults on its territory. “A new norm is going to emerge,” he stated. “There will be a cost, and that cost has been steadily increasing.”

He clarified that India did not incite violence. “All we were doing was giving terrorists a message. “You started,” we said. He recalled the events leading up to the 88-hour military response, known as Operation Sindoor, following the attack in Kashmir on April 22 and declared, “If you stop, we stop.”

Operation Sindoor Defended Abroad

Shashi Tharoor clarified in his speech that Operation Sindoor was a defensive operation. “It was a reluctant but necessary reply,” he said. The goal of the operation was to restore peace and stop additional cross-border terrorist attacks. He claimed that despite the deaths, India’s resolve strengthened.

Additionally, the Congress MP emphasized that India’s priorities differ from those of its neighbors. “We are investing in technology, lifting millions out of poverty, and development,” he stated. He emphasized India’s resolve to become the free-market democracy with the fastest rate of growth.

Unified Diplomatic Front

Together with former ambassador Taranjit Sandhu, the Indian delegation comprised lawmakers from the BJP, Congress, Shiv Sena, TDP, and JMM. Guyana, Panama, Colombia, Brazil, and the United States are all part of their mission. They will travel to Guyana after New York and then return to the United States on June 3.

India’s united front demonstrates the bipartisan nature of the message: Pakistan will suffer real repercussions and terrorism will not be tolerated.

India To Push FATF to Reimpose ‘Grey List’ Status on Pakistan

May 23, 2025, 4:09 pm

India plans to seek the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to put Pakistan back on its grey list. This move aims to increase pressure on Pakistan on matters pertaining to the financing of terrorism. When Pakistan was removed from the grey list in 2022, its reputation with lenders improved.

However, this issue has returned to the forefront due to growing tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbors and ongoing discussions regarding Pakistan’s foreign financial support.

The Effects of Pakistan’s Grey List Status

The countries on the FATF grey list are under close scrutiny for not doing enough to stop money laundering and terrorism financing. Pakistan’s 2022 exclusion from the list improved its reputation internationally and aided in obtaining vital financial assistance during a financial crisis.

There are currently 25 nations that are still under FATF’s “jurisdictions under increased monitoring.” In order to draw attention to Pakistan’s continued strategic shortcomings, India is now attempting to have the country relisted at the next FATF meeting.

India Opposes World Bank Funding for Pakistan

India intends to oppose additional World Bank funding for Pakistan in addition to the FATF push. According to Indian officials, this kind of financial assistance obliquely encourages terrorism. IMF aid to Pakistan has been referred to as a “form of indirect funding to terror” by Defense Minister Rajnath Singh.

On the basis of these arguments, India has also urged the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to reevaluate its bailout package for Pakistan.

IMF’s Conditional Support to Pakistan

The IMF recently defended a $1 billion bailout for Pakistan by claiming that Islamabad had fulfilled the requirements for loan disbursement. Since its approval in September 2024, the Extended Fund Facility program has given Pakistan over $2.1 billion.

However, the IMF added eleven new conditions for future payments. These include obtaining parliamentary permission for reforms, increasing levies on power debt servicing, and lifting import restrictions. India raises concerns about financial mismanagement by arguing that Pakistan’s arms purchases increase every time it receives foreign loans.

PM Modi’s Strong Warning to Pakistan

Pakistan was cautioned by PM Narendra Modi not to export terrorism. If Pakistan keeps doing this, he said, it “will have to beg for every penny.” PM Modi emphasized that Pakistan uses terrorism as a weapon because it cannot win a fair battle.

He continued by saying that Pakistan’s army and economy would suffer greatly from each terrorist strike. This warning conveys India’s firm position against terrorism and its financial consequences.

Economic Pressure as a Strategy Against Terrorism

India plans to exert pressure on FATF to relist Pakistan on the grey list as part of a broader strategy. The goal is to stop the funding of terrorists by applying economic pressure to Pakistan. India rejects foreign loans and issues dire warnings, making a strong statement on the global stage.

The FATF meeting and financial decisions made by institutions such as the World Bank and IMF will be significant events. These will be closely monitored since they will impact future interactions between India and Pakistan.

Pakistan Sees Saudi Arabia as ‘Neutral Venue’ for India Talks, PM Modi Rejects Dialogue

May 22, 2025, 3:54 pm

Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif has indicated that Saudi Arabia could be a ‘neutral’ location for negotiations with India. But Indian PM Narendra Modi has made it clear that there would be no such engagement at all. India has signaled that there will be limited future talks with Pakistan, but only on terrorism issues and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).

This tough line has been taken after a recent Kashmir terror strike and in the midst of international gossip about potential peace talks.

Pakistan Suggests Saudi as Middle Ground

PM Shehbaz Sharif has excluded China as a host but indicated Saudi Arabia could be used as the venue for any possible dialogue with India, Pakistan’s Dawn newspaper reported. He enumerated Kashmir, terrorism, water, and commerce as issues that need to be resolved.

Pakistan’s ex-foreign minister, Bilawal Bhutto, seconded Sharif’s view. Bhutto emphasized the requirement for talks in order to address chronic issues such as Kashmir, terrorism, and water, stating that this would restore peace to South Asia.

India Rejects All Type of Talks

India is, however, firm. Govt sources have rejected US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s claims that India and Pakistan can hold negotiations at a neutral site. PM Modi has reaffirmed that “terror and talks can’t go hand in hand.” In his live address on May 12 during Operation Sindoor, he stated, “Water and blood can’t flow together.”

India’s policy towards cross-border terrorism is one of zero tolerance. It has also embarked on a diplomatic offensive to unmask Pakistan’s terror connections. A multi-party delegation is visiting 32 nations and the European Union to project Pakistan-backed terrorism.

Dialogue Only on Terror and PoK

India’s government line is unequivocal: no negotiations before Pakistan desists from all acts of terror. Talks if and when they happen will be only about ending terrorism and solving the problem of PoK. Issues such as trade and Kashmir will not be discussed.

Despite the current ceasefire after DGMO-level talks, relations remain tense. Shehbaz Sharif may claim de-escalation, but New Delhi sees little change. PM Modi’s firm tone sends a clear message: peace is possible only when Pakistan abandons terror. Until then, dialogue remains a distant dream.

India Sends Strong Message to World: Pakistan Behind Global Terror for 40 Years

May 20, 2025, 6:48 pm

India has initiated a massive diplomatic mission, dispatching 59 political representatives to 32 nations and the EU to reinforce Pakistan’s 40-year history of global terrorism. The government has prepared MPs, former ministers, and party leaders from various parties to take evidence of Pakistan-sponsored terror, including evidence of 2008 attacks.

These missions will interact with lawmakers, think tanks, and diaspora members overseas. They seek to bring Pakistan’s support for terror organizations into the daylight, combat disinformation, and clarify India’s recent military action against cross-border attacks, including Operation Sindoor.

India also suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, after civilians were killed in Pahalgam. The message is unequivocal: India demands that the world view Pakistan not merely as a neighbour, but as an historic state sponsor of terror.

Established Evidence, Minimal Cooperation

Officials remembered India’s previous attempts to reveal Pakistan’s links with terrorism during the high-level briefing. In 2008, India provided tangible evidence — DNA samples, telephone records — while investigating some big terror attacks. But Pakistan had provided meager cooperation in return.

Today, India is promoting this message more aggressively. Each delegation will have country-specific dossiers highlighting Pakistan’s terror connections, India’s counter-terror operations, and security procedures. The delegations will interact with foreign lawmakers, ministers, think tanks, and the Indian diaspora to build support.

Strategic Shift and Military Clarity

Authorities clarified that India has adopted a “new normal” in its interaction with Pakistan. The Indian military and intelligence agencies now work under a strategy for the long haul. India has embraced a clear doctrine: retaliate firmly to threats of terror, both military and diplomatic.

This strategy was evident in the recent ‘Operation Sindoor’. On May 7, precision attacks on terror camps were carried out by Indian forces in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The attacks came after Pakistan-backed groups were accused of killing 26 civilians in the Pahalgam terror attack.

In retaliation, Pakistan tried to strike Indian military installations on May 8, 9, and 10. But Indian forces retaliated with intense counter-attacks against Pakistani military facilities. After four days of intense cross-border missile and drone exchanges, both countries decided to stop fighting on May 10.

Fighting Propaganda and Policy Shifts

India is also combating Pakistan’s international campaigns of disinformation. Delegates were briefed by officials on initiatives for combating false narratives, such as deceptive assertions on sharing water. In a dramatic gesture, India put its involvement in the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty on hold after the attack in Pahalgam.

Through these foreign sojourns, India seeks to unveil Pakistan’s cross-border terrorism and counter its diplomatic strategy. Armed with facts, these teams will push global leaders to speak more strongly against terror — and its state patrons.

India-Pak Clash: Pakistan Hits Back After PM Modi’s Operation Sindoor Warning

May 14, 2025, 1:42 am

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Monday addressed the nation following the successful execution of Operation Sindoor, carried out by Indian armed forces targeting terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan. He praised the armed forces and warned Pakistan that India had only paused its retaliation, not ended it. He also stated firmly that “terror and talks cannot go together” and “water and blood cannot flow together.”

Pakistan’s reaction: Rejects remarks, urges peace

Reacting to PM Modi’s statement, Pakistan’s foreign ministry issued a strong rebuttal, calling the Indian Prime Minister’s remarks “provocative and inflammatory.” The statement added that Pakistan remains committed to the recent ceasefire understanding and is taking steps to maintain regional stability.

Pakistan also expressed hope that India would “prioritise regional stability and the well-being of its citizens.” However, the ministry added that any future aggression from India would be met with full resolve.

Modi issues fresh warning at air force base

On Tuesday, PM Modi visited the Adampur air base in Punjab and reiterated his warning. He said India is always ready for peace but will make its enemies “bite the dust” if provoked again. His statement came just days after Pakistan reportedly launched drones and missiles toward Indian territory, prompting a swift Indian response.

Ceasefire reached, but tensions persist

After four days of intense military action, a ceasefire understanding was reached on Saturday between India and Pakistan. The ceasefire was first announced by US President Donald Trump. However, violations were reported within hours, with drones spotted over Jammu, Punjab, Srinagar, and Rajasthan.

Drones were again spotted on Monday, shortly after PM Modi’s speech. While there was initial alarm, the situation remained peaceful through the night.

Operation Sindoor: Background

Operation Sindoor was launched by India on May 7 as a response to the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, where 26 civilians were killed by terrorists linked to Pakistan. The operation targeted nine terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir using advanced air and missile strikes.

The diplomatic and military standoff continues to evolve, with both countries issuing statements while the international community watches closely.

‘Set Up Tesla Factory In Pakistan If It’s So Great!’: Indian Doctor Mocks And Trolls Trump | EPIC VIDEO

May 13, 2025, 1:07 pm

In an ironic twist to the recent India-Pakistan ceasefire attempt, US President Donald Trump found himself on the receiving end of a witty remark from Dr. Deepak Krishnamurthy, a senior cardiologist from Bengaluru. The response came shortly after Trump’s claim that his administration played a crucial role in brokering a ceasefire agreement between the two nations. While the ceasefire fell apart within hours, Dr. Krishnamurthy shared a humorous suggestion on the social media platform X, which quickly gained traction.

Trump’s Ceasefire Claim and Trade Leverage

On Monday, President Trump made headlines when he claimed that the US administration successfully brokered a ceasefire agreement between India and Pakistan. He further asserted that the United States played a key role in easing the tension between the two countries by leveraging trade deals.

WATCH THE VIRAL VIDEO:

#WATCH | US President Donald Trump says, “…On Saturday, my administration helped broker an immediate ceasefire, I think a permanent one between India and Pakistan – the countries having a lot of nuclear weapons…”

(Source – White House/Youtube) pic.twitter.com/4q5LXFhtZ4

— ANI (@ANI) May 12, 2025

“We have helped a lot, and we also helped with trade. I said, ‘Come on, we’re going to do a lot of trade with you guys. Let’s stop it, let’s stop it. If you stop it, we’re doing trade,'” Trump said, highlighting his involvement in facilitating the agreement. The ceasefire, however, failed to hold, and hostilities resumed shortly after the announcement.

Dr. Deepak Krishnamurthy’s Epic Suggestion

Dr. Krishnamurthy, not one to miss an opportunity for humor, took to X to offer a suggestion that quickly went viral. His tweet humorously implied that if Trump truly believed Pakistan was a great country, he should ask Elon Musk to set up a Tesla factory there.

“If Trump thinks Pakistan is a great country, he should ask Elon Musk to set up the Tesla factory in Pakistan,” Krishnamurthy wrote. The light-hearted remark poked fun at Trump’s role in the failed ceasefire and added a touch of humor to the political drama surrounding the issue.

The Pahalgam Terror Attack and India’s Response

The backdrop to the ceasefire was the tragic terror attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir, which resulted in the death of 26 tourists. In retaliation, the Indian Armed Forces launched Operation Sindoor, targeting nine terror camps across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The attack fueled the already tense relations between India and Pakistan, prompting international mediation attempts, including Trump’s intervention.

Despite the US President’s optimistic claims, the situation remained volatile, and the ceasefire proved short-lived, with both sides quickly returning to hostilities. The subsequent exchange of military actions highlighted the complexity and urgency of the Kashmir conflict, which continues to be a contentious issue between the two nations.

While the US President’s claim of mediating a ceasefire between India and Pakistan has been met with skepticism, the light-hearted response from Dr. Krishnamurthy has certainly added a dose of humor to the situation. The Kashmir conflict, deeply rooted in political, territorial, and historical complexities, remains unresolved, with international efforts to mediate seemingly unable to make a lasting impact.

As tensions continue, the focus will likely remain on the region’s security situation, as well as the broader geopolitical dynamics that shape relations between India, Pakistan, and the international community.

Secrets Of Kirana Hills: Radioactive Mystery Unfolds In Pakistan | WATCH

May 13, 2025, 11:50 am

Following India’s precision strikes under Operation Sindoor, social media platforms have been abuzz with speculation about a potential nuclear radiation leak in Pakistan’s Kirana Hills region, located near Sargodha. Despite widespread rumours, neither India nor Pakistan has confirmed any radiation-related crisis. Yet, the alleged deployment of a US radiation monitoring aircraft has fueled global curiosity.

No Confirmed Nuclear Emergency, Say Authorities

As of May 13, 2025, there have been no verified medical emergencies or official warnings indicating radiation exposure in Pakistan. The Indian Air Force (IAF) has also strongly denied targeting the nuclear-sensitive Kirana Hills during its strikes.

Air Marshal AK Bharti clarified, “We have not hit Kirana Hills — whatever is there.” India maintains its airstrikes were aimed solely at terror infrastructure and legitimate military targets, not nuclear sites.

WATCH THE VIRAL VIDEO:

“We’ve not hit Kirana hills, whatever is there” – DGMO IAF.

Plausible deniability. Bruh…? pic.twitter.com/7VAX7Z5Ewr

— Stoic Coder (@stoic_coder11) May 12, 2025

Kirana Hills: Pakistan’s Strategic Military Zone

Kirana Hills, situated in Sargodha district, is believed to house critical underground infrastructure, possibly for nuclear warhead storage. With over a dozen fortified tunnels and close proximity to key military sites like Sargodha Air Base (20 km) and the Khushab nuclear complex (75 km), the area holds immense strategic value for Pakistan’s defense posture.

The Leak Rumour: How It All Started

Speculation began after reports suggested India’s airstrikes occurred near Sargodha, sparking assumptions that Kirana Hills might have been affected. These claims were amplified by social media chatter and unverified sightings of US and Egyptian aircraft over Pakistani airspace.

One aircraft in particular, the Beechcraft B350 AMS, drew significant attention. Known for its role in the Aerial Measuring System (AMS), it belongs to the US Department of Energy and is built for high-precision nuclear radiation detection and fallout mapping.

US Radiation Aircraft Adds Fuel to Fire

The B350 AMS aircraft is not a regular military or commercial plane. Equipped with gamma ray sensors, real-time data transmission systems, and advanced geographic mapping tools, it can fly at low altitudes and slow speeds to detect radiation leaks and monitor affected zones. The aircraft has previously been deployed in post-nuclear event scenarios, including Fukushima, and during US nuclear tests.

Though no official confirmation has been issued by US authorities, open-source flight data from platforms like Flightradar24 showed a B350 AMS variant with tail number N111SZ briefly appearing in Pakistani airspace.

Interestingly, this tail number reportedly matches a US-origin aircraft transferred to Pakistan’s Army Aviation in 2010. This led analysts to speculate that either Pakistan deployed the aircraft on its own, or the US and Pakistan coordinated its use to assess possible radiation fallout.

What This Means: Real Threat or Overreaction?

If the Beechcraft B350 AMS was indeed activated by Pakistan, it could indicate internal concern about radiation safety, even without an official nuclear event. The mere presence of such an aircraft, in the aftermath of India’s strikes near a nuclear-sensitive zone, has raised global eyebrows.

While some experts argue that such monitoring could be precautionary, others see it as possible indirect confirmation that sensitive infrastructure may have been impacted—if not directly hit.

Still, until international bodies like the IAEA or official Pakistani agencies issue a statement, the reality remains unclear. What’s certain is that Operation Sindoor, combined with the aircraft’s appearance, has shifted the focus of global strategic observers towards Pakistan’s nuclear assets and India’s evolving strike doctrines.

Kashmir Conflict: What Trump Said and Why India Said No | TDG Explainer

May 12, 2025, 5:23 pm

In May 2025, US President Donald Trump proposed to mediate the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan after the two countries signed a ceasefire deal. While Pakistan embraced the initiative, India categorically rejected it, adhering to its time-tested perception that Kashmir is a bilateral matter. Supported by the Simla Agreement, India’s contention is that only bilateral negotiations with Pakistan—without outside intervention—can end the issue.

The Indian government maintains that the sole point of negotiation is the return of Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (PoK), reiterating that Kashmir is a sovereignty issue and not up for discussion. The statements by Trump triggered political discourse in India and received approbation from Pakistan, which still continues to advocate for international mediation. India, however, remains unmoved, seeing third-party interference as an attack on its autonomy and territorial sovereignty.

Kashmir Conflict: India Spurns Mediation—Again

India has consistently considered Kashmir to be a bilateral issue. New Delhi did not waste any time in reacting when Donald Trump made the proposal. The response was an unmistakable and categorical “no.” Indian authorities referred to the 1972 Simla Agreement, which binds both countries to resolve issues exclusively through bilateral discussions.

Additionally, India made its stand even clearer. Officials explained that the sole remaining issue is the return of Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (PoK). One government official said flatly, “There is only one matter left—the return of PoK. We don’t want to discuss any other topic.” That is the Indian perspective on Kashmir: not as a conflict, but as an issue of territorial integrity and national sovereignty.

Trump’s Move and Pakistan’s Praise for Kashmir

On May 11, 2025, Trump commended India and Pakistan for committing to a ceasefire. He hailed it as a move toward peace and said he was willing to assist them in discovering a lasting solution—perhaps one that might take “a thousand years,” he added. Trump made the US a peace-broker, positioning the country to play the central role in the negotiations.

Pakistan accepted his proposal without any delay. Islamabad has been demanding international intervention in Kashmir for decades. It believes the issue of Kashmir is that of human rights and self-determination. After Trump’s comments, Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry restated its appeal for a settlement based on UN Security Council resolutions. These include the demand for a plebiscite to decide the future of Kashmir.

Pakistan’s reaction was in line with its traditional stance. It desires external players—particularly the US and the UN—to step in. That attitude is in direct contrast to India’s, which does not allow any foreign hand to steer negotiations.

Simla Agreement: India’s Diplomatic Anchor

India’s rejection of third-party mediation isn’t new—it’s part of its post-1971 war foreign policy. The Simla Agreement of 1972 unambiguously stipulates that India and Pakistan will settle their matters through bilateral talks, without outside intervention.

This is not a legal argument, it is one of sovereignty. For India, to let another country mediate would be to compromise its jurisdiction over a key internal issue. It would also set a precedent for foreign powers to meddle in other border conflicts. India’s path is clear: exercise its sovereignty, defend its borders, and resolve matters without foreign interference.

Political Ripples in India

Trump’s remarks provoked political outrage back home. The opposition, led by the Congress Party, condemned the comments. Congress MP Manish Tewari reminded everyone that the war started in 1947, when Pakistan had invaded Kashmir. He pointed out that the Maharaja of Kashmir had legally acceded to India, and that Pakistan still illegally occupies part of the territory.

Even some opposition leaders questioned whether the Indian government had been sending mixed signals. They sounded the alarm over recent remarks by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who alluded to a “neutral forum” for negotiations. To many, this was the start of a drift away from the Simla framework.

Pakistan’s Push for Global Involvement

Islamabad, in turn, doubled down on its approach. It kept insisting on international mediation. Pakistani leaders tend to present Kashmir as both a territorial dispute and a human rights issue. They argue that the people of Kashmir have a right to decide their own destiny.

Leaders such as Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari and the country’s ex-senior NSA Moeed Yusuf urged international assurance be made necessary. They argue that without it being a global venture, peace continues to be ephemeral—more so considering both are nuclear-capable countries. India and Pakistan, they contend, will be unable to arrive at stable peace by themselves.

India’s Broader Strategy: Autonomy Above All

India’s stance on Kashmir is directly related to its broader foreign policy objectives. As an emerging world power and a leading voice in institutions such as the G20 and BRICS, India seeks to project strength and autonomy. Taking in mediation would undermine that perception.

More significantly, it would undermine India’s narrative control. Granting outsiders the authority to influence negotiations would provide Pakistan with leverage and diminish India’s voice in its domestic affairs. Sovereignty for New Delhi is non-negotiable. Kashmir, especially, is not negotiable.

No Room for a Middleman in Kashmir Issue

Trump’s offer may have made headlines, but it did little to change India’s firm stance. For New Delhi, Kashmir remains an issue to be discussed directly with Islamabad—nothing more, nothing less. The Simla Agreement still guides its approach, and the idea of mediation still gets rejected.

While Pakistan still looks for the world to be involved, India remains committed to one thing: the return of PoK. Anything else than that, in its view, is interference. For the time being, and probably for the near future, there is no space for a middleman.

Air Marshal AK Bharti Slams Pakistan Military for Aiding Terrorists: ‘It Is a Pity’ | WATCH

May 12, 2025, 2:58 pm

In the press conference, Air Marshal AK Bharti criticized the Pakistani army’s role in supporting terrorists as a “pity” that Pakistan opted for intervention instead of peace. This was part of India’s overall criticism of cross-border militancy and state-sponsored terrorism. AK Bharti affirmed that India decided to retaliate exactly because the Pakistani army aligned itself with terrorists.

His words not only reflect the enduring tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbors but also India’s no-tolerance policy towards terrorism. This article examines the significance of his statement, the past history of military clashes, and what this implies for regional stability.

#WATCH | Delhi | #OperationSindoor | Air Marshal AK Bharti says, “…It is a pity that the Pakistani military chose to intervene and that for terrorists, and hence we chose to respond…” pic.twitter.com/c3sHHKaRKI

— ANI (@ANI) May 12, 2025

Pakistan’s Military Error

The Pakistani military’s decision to intervene—not to preserve peace, but to aid terrorists—was regrettable, said Air Marshal Bharti. His use of the word “pity” highlighted the missed chance for conversation. The Pakistani military has long been accused of providing sanctuary to terrorist organizations. That impression was strengthened by Bharti’s remarks. Pakistan became complicit in the ensuing violence by providing assistance to non-state actors.

India did not act hastily. AK Bharti explained that Pakistan’s decision to side with terrorists was the only reason the Indian Air Force reacted. This demonstrates both firm resolve and strategic restraint. India has consistently insisted that it will only strike back when provoked. Bharti’s remarks provide unique insight into the deliberate deliberation that goes into military action. India supports peace, but not at the expense of national security, as his statements make clear.

Cross-Border Tensions Have a Long History

Decades of mistrust serve as the background for AK Bharti’s statement. Bilateral relations have been strained by instances of Pakistani-backed militancy, such as the Kargil War and the Pulwama attack. Bharti’s remarks support a widely held belief in India that Pakistan must decide between diplomacy and terrorism. Its military distances itself from peace by supporting terrorists.

Strategic Importance of AK Bharti’s Statements

Air Marshals don’t mince words. In strategic circles, AK Bharti’s remarks are taken seriously. His declaration makes it clear to Islamabad and the rest of the world that India will take action if its sovereignty is questioned. It also reveals Pakistan’s two-pronged strategy of promoting peace while supporting militants.

The tone for India’s future reactions was established by AK Bharti’s comments. India will not think twice about using force to combat terrorism as long as it is dedicated to peace. Pakistan is now responsible. Will it reconsider its strategy or keep treading the fine line between militancy and diplomacy?

Ceasefire Talks, Unequal Voices: Can India-Pakistan Military Talks Hold Without Rank Parity?

May 12, 2025, 1:03 pm

Asymmetrical military dialogue between India and Pakistan is breeding fresh doubts about strategic symmetry, credibility, and long-term faith. Even as weapons grow silent following a tense week along the Line of Control, India’s Lt Gen Rajeev Ghai and Pakistan’s Maj Gen-level DGMO will have their second dialogue on ceasefire.

But this asymmetry of military rank still betrays a deeper diplomacy asymmetry—one which may determine results on and off the battlefield.

Fragile Ceasefire on Uneven Ground

India and Pakistan negotiated a ceasefire on May 10, halting all military action by land, air, and sea from 5 PM onwards. Pakistan made the first overtures, and Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri verified the offer. It was a turning point for de-escalation following India’s retaliatory strikes on terrorist bases and military installations in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.

Even as the government made the announcement, Pakistan returned to firing hours later. It puts in doubt the sustainability of these talks, particularly when reciprocal trust is thin.

DGMO Talks: Important but Imbalanced

DGMO-level discussions began in earnest after the 1971 war. They became vital after the 1999 war at Kargil. Regular contact and emergency talks prevent the situation from escalating. But India always dispatches a Lt Gen, while Pakistan sends a lesser-ranked Maj Gen.

This disparity is not figurative—it counts. India’s DGMO directs general-operational strategies. He is directly responsible to the Army Chief. Pakistan’s DGMO is under stricter command and enjoys less room to maneuver. This disconnect provides India more leeway, but also distorts the dialogue.

Rank Disparity Sends Mixed Signals

A superior Indian rank may appear as eagerness or concession. It may allow Pakistan to spin the situation as India requiring talks more. Internally, it questions the Pakistani officer’s credibility to deliver or commit.

Perception determines outcomes in military diplomacy. Global players such as NATO, Russia, the US, and China equate military ranks during negotiations. They do so to ensure equality to uphold mutual respect and successful negotiation.

India Can—and Should—Recalibrate

India has rebalanced ranks in other negotiations earlier, including with rebellion groups. It can repeat the same here. India may deputise a Maj Gen, rather than a Lt Gen, for talks with Pakistan. A Maj Gen also carries some weight and clout. For the normal talks, even a Brigadier would be suitable.

This would not dilute India’s standing. It would level the table, cut posturing, and enable concentrated tactical deliberations. India would still maintain Lt Gen-level representation for high-risk affairs.

Symbol of Strength, Not Weakness

Equality of ranks reflects decisiveness, not weakness. It demonstrates India’s maturity and assurance. It enables building actual dialogue rather than disparity of power. The present uneven format cannot withstand substantive building of trust.

If India desires outcomes on the ground, it needs to have equality at the table. That is, speaking as equals, not as dominants. Pakistan also needs to step up—if it wants peace, it should align ranks and seriousness accordingly.

In military diplomacy, form is important. Trust starts not only with ceasefires—but with who is across the table.

India’s Warning: Modi to Vance— Stronger Strike Than Pakistan

May 12, 2025, 1:06 am

In a high-level phone call on May 9, Prime Minister Narendra Modi told US Vice President JD Vance that any future attack from Pakistan would be met with a response “more forceful, stronger, more devastating” than anything Islamabad could deliver. This declaration came amid rising tensions following the deadly Pahalgam terror attack on April 22.

Operation Sindoor Launched After Pahalgam Attack

India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting nine terror infrastructure sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. This came as retaliation for the Pahalgam attack, which killed civilians and tourists. The Indian government communicated clearly with global partners that such terror activities would not go unanswered.

“They Fire, We Fire”: India’s Clear Message

Officials familiar with the situation revealed that India maintained a consistent message after the Pahalgam attack. “They fire, we fire. They stop, we stop,” one official said. India’s leadership made it clear that any attempt to equate victims with perpetrators would no longer be tolerated.

Swift Military Response Left No Time for Interference

When Pakistan attempted to strike 26 Indian military facilities on May 10, India responded swiftly with long-range weapon strikes on eight Pakistani air bases. The rapid and powerful response reportedly left no time for diplomatic interference. Hours later, both countries agreed to halt further military actions.

Direct Communication Preferred Over Back Channels

After the Indian strikes, Pakistan reached out to the US, expressing willingness to de-escalate. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio conveyed this to External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar. However, India insisted that any de-escalation must come through direct communication, rejecting third-party diplomacy.

No Support for Pakistan from West Asian Countries

Despite shuttle diplomacy from countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran, Indian officials observed that West Asian nations largely understood India’s position. There was no evidence of a united Islamic front in favor of Pakistan, and the OIC resolution even condemned terrorism in the context of Jammu and Kashmir.

China’s Predictable Support for Pakistan

India was not surprised by China’s support for Pakistan, including its military assistance during recent skirmishes. China’s alignment with Islamabad, calling it an “ironclad brother,” remained unchanged during the conflict.

Sirens Wail, Explosions Heard as Akhnoor Faces Blackout in J-K | Watch

May 10, 2025, 6:39 am

A total blackout was declared in the Akhnoor region of Jammu and Kashmir on Saturday. Loud explosions and sirens were reported in the area, raising concern among locals. The blackout came shortly after drones were reportedly seen in Jalandhar, Punjab.

Drones Spotted in Jalandhar, Authorities Urge Calm

Authorities in Jalandhar imposed a temporary blackout as a safety measure after some drones were reportedly spotted in the area.

“We have imposed a blackout for some time as a few drones have been reportedly sighted in Jalandhar. Forces are checking. Please be calm and follow blackout protocol,” said the Deputy Commissioner of Jalandhar.

#WATCH | जम्मू और कश्मीर | उधमपुर के डिब्बर इलाके से जोरदार विस्फोट के बाद धुआं उठता हुआ दिखाई दे रहा है। हवाई सायरन बजाए जा रहे हैं। pic.twitter.com/ubAbQ6RZhu

— ANI_HindiNews (@AHindinews) May 10, 2025

Indian Army Responds to Drone Attacks

According to defence sources, the Indian Army gave a strong response in the Jammu sector after Pakistan launched drone attacks on Indian cities near the Line of Control (LoC) and the International Border (IB).

On Friday, drones were seen at 26 locations from Baramulla in the north to Bhuj in the south, indicating the scale of the threat. These drones are suspected to be armed, posing danger to civilians and military personnel alike.

Widespread Drone Activity Across India-Pak Border

The areas where drones were reported include Baramulla, Srinagar, Avantipora, Nagrota, Jammu, Ferozpur, Pathankot, Fazilka, Lalgarh Jatta, Jaisalmer, Barmer, Bhuj, Kuarbet, and Lakhi Nala.

In one serious case, a drone attacked a civilian neighborhood in Punjab’s Ferozpur, leaving several members of a local family severely injured. The wounded were quickly taken to the hospital, and the security forces sanitized the area.

Military on High Alert

The Indian Armed Forces remain on high alert, with counter-drone systems actively monitoring and neutralizing aerial threats. Defence officials said they are keeping a close eye on the situation and are ready to act swiftly whenever needed.

Drones Intercepted in Jammu and Samba

A day after Indian air defence blocked an attempt by Pakistani drones to hit civilian infrastructure, more drones were seen again in areas like Jammu, Samba, and Pathankot. In the Samba sector, people witnessed red streaks in the sky and heard loud explosions as Indian air defence successfully intercepted incoming drones during a blackout.

More Blackouts in Jammu Region

In addition to Akhnoor, a blackout was also enforced in Udhampur due to continued drone sightings and security threats. India has already carried out precision strikes targeting terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK). These strikes were in response to the earlier Pahalgam terror attack. Pakistan, in turn, has escalated tensions with drone attacks, which the Indian military is addressing firmly.

India Strikes Islamabad After Lahore and Karachi Attacks

May 8, 2025, 11:10 pm

In a major escalation of the ongoing conflict, India has now attacked Islamabad, the capital of Pakistan, after previously striking Lahore and Karachi. The latest action has caused widespread panic in Pakistan, as per early reports.

Tensions Rise in Pakistan’s Major Cities

According to sources, Indian forces have carried out targeted operations in three of Pakistan’s major cities — Lahore, Karachi, and now Islamabad — under the codename Operation Sindoor. The strikes are believed to be in response to recent missile and drone attacks from the Pakistani side.

High Alert in Both Nations

Following the reported strikes, Pakistan has placed its defence forces on high alert. Indian officials have not yet released a formal statement, but Defence Minister Rajnath Singh had earlier convened emergency meetings with military chiefs.

Global Eyes on India-Pakistan Developments

The international community is watching closely as India-Pakistan tensions continue to escalate. There is rising concern over regional stability, with many calling for restraint and diplomatic intervention.

Operation Sindoor: Trump offers to ‘help’ as India-Pak tensions escalate

May 8, 2025, 7:39 am

US President Donald Trump has spoken out about the rising tensions between India and Pakistan following India’s high-precision military offensive, Operation Sindoor. He expressed concern over the ongoing attacks and said he would be willing to help both nations if needed.

“I want to see them stop,” says Trump

Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump said, “It’s so terrible. My position is that I get along with both. I know both very well, and I want to see them work it out… And if I can do anything to help, I will be there.”

The remarks came just a day after India launched strikes on nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) in response to the Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 people on April 22.

Trump calls for end to hostilities

When asked if he had any message for India and Pakistan, Trump said, “I just hope it ends very quickly.” He acknowledged the long history of tensions between the two nations, saying, “They’ve been fighting for many decades, and centuries, actually, if you really think about it.”

Pakistan reports casualties, vows retaliation

The Pakistan Army claimed that 31 people were killed and 57 others injured in the missile strikes. Spokesperson Lt Gen Ahmad Sharif Chaudhry also confirmed cross-border firing on the Line of Control (LoC) following the Indian operation.

Pakistan has labelled the Indian strikes as “unprovoked” and promised to retaliate at a “time and place of its choosing.”

Operation Sindoor: Pak PM Shehbaz vows revenge after India’s strike on terror camps

May 8, 2025, 1:47 am

Amid soaring tensions between India and Pakistan, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif issued a strong response to India’s Operation Sindoor, which destroyed nine major terror hubs inside Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).

PM Shehbaz Sharif warns of retaliation

Addressing the nation, Shehbaz Sharif declared that Pakistan will retaliate and take the conflict to the end. “We will take revenge for every death. Our army and people will stay united. We are the most affected by terrorism, and we will win this fight,” he said.

National Security Council convenes emergency meeting

Soon after the Indian strike, Sharif chaired an emergency meeting of Pakistan’s National Security Council, attended by cabinet members, services chiefs, and top officials. The Pakistani government called India’s move “unprovoked” and labelled it an “unlawful act of war”.

Pakistan reserves right to strike back

Pakistan invoked Article 51 of the UN Charter, stating it reserves the right to respond “at a time, place, and manner of its choosing.” Defence Minister Khawaja Asif added that Pakistan is open to ending the tensions if India de-escalates first.

Pakistan closes and reopens airspace

Following the strikes, Pakistan closed its airspace for 48 hours, causing disruption in regional air traffic. However, the airspace was reopened after just eight hours.

India’s high-precision strike under Operation Sindoor

The Indian armed forces launched Operation Sindoor between 1:05 am and 1:30 am on May 7, targeting nine terror camps including:

Muzaffarabad’s Sawai Nala Camp & Syedna Belal Camp
Gulpur Camp, Abbas Camp, Barnala Camp
Sarjal Camp, Mehmoona Joya Camp
Markaz Taiba & Markaz Subhan in Bahawalpur

According to Indian authorities, 26 terrorists were killed in the strikes, all linked to groups like LeT, JeM, and Hizbul Mujahideen.

Breaking: Indian Forces Shoot Down Pakistan Fighter Jet Over Pampore

May 7, 2025, 4:00 am

In a major escalation following India’s cross-border strikes on terror bases, the Indian Air Force shot down a Pakistani fighter jet attempting to breach Indian airspace near Pampore in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pulwama district. The incident occurred on Wednesday morning amid heightened military alertness.

Intrusion Foiled in High-Security Zone

Security forces identified the aircraft as it entered Indian airspace and swiftly responded. The jet was shot down before it could execute any hostile action. Eyewitnesses from Pampore reported hearing loud booms, followed by visuals of the downed aircraft trailing smoke before crashing.

Comes Amid Rising Indo-Pak Tensions

This confrontation follows India’s launch of missile strikes under Operation Sindoor, targeting nine terror bases in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The Indian strikes were a response to the recent Pahalgam terror attack that killed 25 people.

Pakistan Confirms Missile Strikes

According to Pakistan’s Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), Indian missile strikes hit three locations inside Pakistan — Muzaffarabad, Kotli, and Bahawalpur’s Ahmed East area. Lt Gen Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, DG ISPR, confirmed that the attack led to the death of one child, and seriously injured a man and a woman.

Regional Airspace Tense, Alerts in Place

Following the incident, authorities have intensified security across northern sectors, including air defense readiness. Civilian flights continue to face disruptions, and cross-border communications remain tense.

India Strikes Back: Retaliation for Pahalgam Attack Leaves Two Pakistani Civilians dead, 12 Injured

May 7, 2025, 3:13 am

In a bold move of retaliation for the deadly Pahalgam attack, India launched a series of missile strikes across Pakistan. The DG ISPR confirmed that two Pakistani civilians were dead and 12 others were injured as a result of the explosions that took place in cities such as Kotli, Muzaffarabad, Bahawalpur, and Muridke.

The missile strikes were launched from India’s airspace during the dead of night, and Pakistan’s DG ISPR described the attack as a cowardly act. In Bahawalpur, a powerful explosion illuminated the sky before the blast, and sources reported explosions in Muzaffarabad as well. Eyewitnesses in Muzaffarabad mentioned a complete blackout, which added to the panic during the missile strikes.

Pakistan’s Immediate Response: Airspace Closed and Flight Suspensions

In response to India’s strikes, Pakistan has closed its airspace, suspending all flight operations, including those from major airports in Islamabad and Lahore. Aviation sources have confirmed that a 48-hour airspace closure has been imposed, leading to the cancellation of more than 25 flights to international destinations including Qatar, Dubai, and Bahrain.

Pakistan’s military has also indicated that the country will retaliate at an appropriate time, ensuring that India’s “temporary euphoria” will turn into lasting consequences. The DG ISPR emphasized that Pakistan will not tolerate any further provocations and will continue to defend its sovereignty with resolve.

Pathankot to Pahalgam: Why India Rejects Pakistan’s ‘Neutral Probe’ Talk? | TDG Explainer

May 4, 2025, 4:17 pm

India’s strong refusal of Pakistan’s invitation for a “neutral, transparent, and credible” investigation into the recent Pahalgam terror attack is not an overreaction — it’s a position based on history, betrayal, and strategic adjustment. The attack, which claimed the lives of 26 tourists, has a striking resemblance to previous cross-border attacks such as the 2016 Pathankot airbase attack and the 2008 Mumbai attacks, where Pakistan’s alleged cooperation disintegrated into denial, delay, and diplomatic drama.

From botched joint investigations to public revelations by Pakistan’s own media — Islamabad’s latest move is less about justice and more about international perception. Supported by allies such as China and boasting a history of protecting terror actors, Pakistan’s “neutral inquiry” is in the eyes of India neither an avenue to peace but an instrument of imagecraft.

Pahalgam Attack: Cruel Catalyst for Diplomatic Backlash

The April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam demolished the peace of Kashmir. The attack killed 26, targeting tourists at a tourist destination. As soon as two of the attackers were found to be Pakistani nationals, India moved swiftly — intensifying border security and even closing down the Attari-Wagah border.

The shock was not only in the brutality, but in the déjà vu it created. This was not the first time India witnessed Pakistani fingerprints on cross-border terrorism. It wasn’t the first time Pakistan disclaimed involvement and insisted on a “neutral” probe.

Pathankot: Trust That Turned into Betrayal

In 2016, India attempted to cooperate. It welcomed a Pakistani Joint Investigation Team (JIT) into its fold after the Pathankot airbase attack. Seven Indian troops were killed when Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) terrorists attacked the camp. All the attackers were eliminated. India provided forensic details, eyewitness accounts, and even permitted Pakistani authorities to visit the air base.

The five-member JIT comprised leading investigators — among them an officer of Pakistan’s ISI. They took DNA samples, depositions of 16 witnesses, and got NIA’s complete cooperation. They departed with a commitment: Pakistan would let Indian investigators resume the joint probe from Islamabad’s end.

But once back, Islamabad stalled. Media reports began branding the Pathankot attack a “stage-managed” event. Permission for the NIA to visit Pakistan never arrived. The cooperation ended in dead silence — and distrust.

Ahmad Noorani’s Report: Pakistan’s Own Media Broke the Truth

In the middle of this diplomatic freeze, Pakistani investigative journalist Ahmad Noorani published a damning story. He verified that all six terrorists entered India from Pakistan, based on sources within Pakistan’s own civilian Intelligence Bureau. Noorani explained the report was presented to then-PMNawaz Sharif — and even the ISI could not deny the facts.

The discovery embarrassed Pakistan. But rather than taking action on the facts, the state doubled down on denial. The Pathankot case was shelved, not investigated.

26/11 Mumbai Attacks: No Justice

Prior to Pathankot, India attempted to cooperate following the 2008 Mumbai terror attack. Pakistan was subjected to enormous international pressure following the attack, which claimed the lives of more than 160 individuals. India presented seven detailed dossiers that connected the attackers to Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). In return, Pakistan arrested senior LeT operatives — Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi and Zarar Shah.

But the cases lingered. Lakhvi was granted bail in 2014. He was arrested again under international pressure, only to be let out once more a year later. The FIA prosecutor in the case, Chaudhry Zulfikar Ali, was murdered in Karachi.

No one has been convicted as yet in Pakistan for 26/11. For India, it was confirmation that cooperation does not mean accountability.

Pakistan’s Probe Offer: Global Image Reset Strategy

India’s refusal of an impartial probe is not merely emotional — it’s strategic. Islamabad’s proposal this time follows a pattern. Shortly after the Pahalgam attack, Pakistan rallied global opinion. China was quick to follow suit on Pakistan’s side. Pakistan’s erstwhile High Commissioner went so far as to wonder if India feared transparency.

But India today regards these ‘offers’ as a part of Pakistan’s diplomatic choreography. Islamabad acts like the reasonable guy to diffuse global opprobrium. It proffers “neutrality” while silently harboring terrorists in its midst.

This narrative reboot has worked previously. Pakistan has frequently employed such tactics in international forums like the FATF and UN. But India no longer wants to play the same game.

India’s New Stance: No More Symbolic Investigations

The stance of New Delhi is unmistakable: it will not accord sham probes legitimacy. Neutral or joint probes, offered by Pakistan, are in the opinion of India, not aimed at finding the truth but creating delays. They diminish the severity of terror. They also demean the victims’ memory by equating terror with a PR issue, and not with a crime.

Security experts further argue that admitting Pakistani investigators onto Indian soil — or accepting third-party investigations — undermines operational integrity and sovereignty. India now prefers firm unilateral action.

No Probe Without Credibility

Pakistan’s history is full of delays, denials, and distortions. Be it Pathankot, Pahalgam, or 26/11, the pattern is the same. India has every reason to be suspicious of Islamabad’s “neutral” appeals — they are instruments of image management, not justice.

New Delhi has shifted from strategic cooperation to strategic suspicion. It is no longer interested in symbolic gestures. Unless Pakistan delivers justice in previous attacks, India will keep its door shut to any offer of investigation — neutral or otherwise.

Pakistan Closes Ports to Indian Ships After India’s Import Ban

May 4, 2025, 12:41 pm

In response to India’s recent move to prohibit all imports from Pakistan, Pakistan has shut its ports to Indian vessels. This is in response to the Pahalgam terror attack, which resulted in the deaths of 26 tourists in Jammu and Kashmir on April 22.

In addition, India has increased its security measures, suspending postal exchanges and examining key agreements such as the Indus Water Treaty. As tensions increase, both countries are gearing up for more developments, and the naval move highlights the escalating conflict.

In a retaliatory move, #Pakistan has shut its ports for ships coming from #India after the latter banned imports from the neighbouring nation in another economic crackdown after #PahalgamTerrorAttack.

Details?https://t.co/KJCJwGtscJ pic.twitter.com/CtWrqBLqfP

— The Times Of India (@timesofindia) May 4, 2025

India-Pakistan Tensions Rise

The Pakistan Ministry of Maritime Affairs announced the move just hours following India’s ban, citing national security reasons. India had already placed a 200% duty on Pakistani imports after the 2019 Pulwama attack. This latest action, however, is a major escalation.

By blocking its ports to Indian vessels, Pakistan is taking control of maritime routes, which is an indication of a severe deterioration of political and economic ties between the nations.

India’s Firm Position on Security Matters

India’s import ban comes after a string of incidents that amplified security alarm. Specifically, the Pahalgam attack fueled India to intensify its security policy. In response, India halted postal and parcel transfers with Pakistan by air and land. All these measures are intended to economically isolate Pakistan and put further pressure on it.

Thus, India is clearly sending a message of its determination to secure its sovereignty and national security.

Border Tensions and Enhanced Security Measures

The tensions on the seas are not the only ones that are mounting. Indian Border Security Forces (BSF) recently arrested a Pakistan Rangers trooper at the international border in Sriganganagar. This is another addition to the intensifying military standoff between the two countries.

In retaliation, Indian security forces are on their toes, awaiting the slightest provocation to immediately tackle any more intrusions. The trooper, who was deployed in the Bahawalpur sector, is being interrogated.

Power Struggle: India-Pakistan Tensions Escalate

The India-Pakistan conflict now extends beyond trade embargoes or military confrontations. It has evolved into a battle for control—over borders, communication channels, and the larger narrative. While shutting Pakistan’s ports to Indian vessels may appear to be a small step, it is another addition to the mounting tensions. This could result in increased diplomatic isolation and tighter security arrangements.

As events take their course, Pakistan’s choice to block Indian ships escalates the stakes even further. India will most likely respond strongly. The old animosity between the two neighbors is quickly heating up, with both sides firmly entrenched on their sides.

NIA Uncovers Lashkar-ISI-Pakistan Army Link in Pahalgam Terror Attack

May 2, 2025, 11:41 am

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has confirmed a fatal alliance of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), and the Pakistan Army in the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, in which terrorists murdered 26 individuals, the majority of whom were tourists.

The NIA’s initial report states that overground workers (OGWs) within Jammu & Kashmir were the largest facilitators to allow the attack. The handlers of the attack were based in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), and India has officially blamed Pakistan, which prompted robust diplomatic and military warnings of reprisal.

Coordinated Cross-Border Conspiracy

According to NIA sources, the Pahalgam massacre planning wasn’t in isolation. It was orchestrated attack by LeT, ISI, and the Pakistan Army together. The group that had taken responsibility — The Resistance Front (TRF) — is LeT’s proxy, employed to project an image of local militancy.

But the evidence of the NIA connects the terror module with Pakistan’s official and unofficial arms directly.

The report highlights the central role of overground workers, who supplied logistics, shelter, finance, and ground-level advice to the attackers. These civilian-attired enablers did not bear arms, but they facilitated the attack.

The NIA has already identified known OGWs in Jammu and Kashmir and is making preparations for administrative and judicial action against them.

India’s Strategic and Diplomatic Response

India has responded vigorously to the Pahalgam attack. The government has put the Indus Waters Treaty on abeyance, has expelled all Pakistani nationals, and closed Indian airspace to Pakistan-based flights.

PM Narendra Modi also made a stern statement, stating, “India will identify, track, and punish every terrorist and their backers.” Spoken in English in a public speech in Bihar, Modi’s statement was a clear message to the world — India will strike back.

A looming military revenge?

With Pakistan on notice and global eyes watching, a cross-border military response now looks more and more likely. India has taken statements from 150 people and carried out 3-D mapping of the attack area. The case is the most serious since the 2008 Mumbai attacks, both in terms of size and geopolitical consequences.

A fresh layer of worry arises as the NIA reconstructs the Pahalgam attack using 3-D mapping. This technology-based probe indicates a hybrid warfare strategy — where asymmetric terrorism is combined with high-tech reconnaissance. The assailants operated with high situational awareness, indicating advanced pre-attack planning beyond OGW support.

This attack may prove to be a tipping point in India-Pakistan relations. By officially connecting LeT, ISI, and Pakistan Army, the NIA has made state-sponsored terrorism and proxy war indistinguishable. India’s reaction may redefine deterrence norms in South Asia.

“India, Pakistan Will Figure It Out”: Trump Breaks Silence on Pahalgam Terror Attack

April 26, 2025, 1:44 am

In his first remarks since the Pahalgam terror attack that shook Jammu & Kashmir earlier this week, US President Donald Trump commented on rising tensions between India and Pakistan, suggesting that the two countries would eventually “figure it out.”

While speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump referred to the long-standing rivalry between the South Asian neighbours but declined to confirm whether he had contacted the leaders of either nation.

“There’s great tension between Pakistan and India, but there always has been,” Trump said. “They’ll get it figured out one way or the other.”

Deadliest Attack in Decades

The April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, a tourist hotspot in Jammu & Kashmir, resulted in the deaths of 26 people, marking one of the deadliest attacks in the region in nearly 20 years.

Gunmen opened fire in a popular meadow frequented by tourists. Indian authorities have blamed Pakistani-backed elements, a claim Islamabad has firmly denied.

Diplomacy and Trade Under Threat

Following the attack, diplomatic relations between India and Pakistan have sharply deteriorated. India has suspended a crucial Indus Waters Treaty dialogue, while Pakistan responded by closing its airspace to Indian flights.

Trade between the two countries—already minimal—faces a complete shutdown as both sides harden their positions.

Economic Jitters in India

The attack also sent shockwaves through Indian financial markets, with the stock market dropping sharply on Friday amid fears of escalation. However, the market regained some losses as the government launched an aggressive counter-terror operation in Kashmir.

What’s Next?

With both countries on edge and global powers watching closely, Trump’s comment—though brief—adds to the growing chorus calling for calm and resolution.

Whether this marks the beginning of backchannel diplomacy or further tension remains to be seen. But for now, the focus remains on security, accountability, and the quest for peace in a region long burdened by conflict.

‘A Failed State Surviving On Handouts’: India Blasts Pakistan At UNHRC

February 27, 2025, 7:52 am

At the 58th Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) on Thursday, India’s Permanent Mission in Geneva launched a scathing attack on Pakistan, accusing it of being a “failed state” that depends on international handouts. Kshitij Tyagi, India’s UN envoy, condemned Pakistan’s leadership for spreading what he termed “falsehoods” dictated by its military, and for misusing global platforms to advance anti-India rhetoric.

Scathing Critique of Pakistan

During his address, Tyagi criticised Pakistan for its inability to provide proper governance and justice to its people. He argued that Pakistan’s actions, including the persecution of minorities and the harboring of UN-sanctioned terrorists, severely undermine its credibility on human rights and democracy. “Its rhetoric reeks of hypocrisy, its actions of inhumanity, and its governance of incompetence,” Tyagi stated, adding that Pakistan should focus on addressing its own internal crises rather than obsessing over India.

Defending India’s Territorial Integrity

Tyagi reiterated that the Union Territories of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh are, and will remain, integral and inalienable parts of India. Citing significant political, social, and economic progress in these regions, he contrasted their stability with Pakistan’s ongoing unrest, which he attributed to decades of Pakistan-sponsored terrorism. He stressed, “The unprecedented progress in J&K speaks for itself. Pakistan, as a failed state, has no right to lecture on human rights.”

Broader Diplomatic Context

India’s harsh remarks came on the heels of a strong statement by Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish during an open debate at the United Nations Security Council, where he reaffirmed India’s sovereign claim over Jammu and Kashmir. The comments reflect growing frustration within India over Pakistan’s internal governance and its persistent anti-India posture on international platforms.

A Call for Accountability

Tyagi’s address not only condemned Pakistan’s actions but also served as a call to the international community to focus on real governance issues rather than falling for politically motivated rhetoric. As India maintains its commitment to democracy, progress, and the dignity of its people, critics argue that Pakistan must first address its own systemic failures before commenting on the human rights record of others.

The debate at the UNHRC underscores the ongoing diplomatic tensions between India and Pakistan, with both sides entrenched in their positions as the international community watches closely.