Latest Byju's News | Top Byju's News Headlines Today | Today India news | Breaking Byju's News Today | English Byju's News Headlines - TheDailyGuardian

Byju Raveendran’s Emotional Appeal: CEO Seeks Probe Into Alleged EY-Glas Trust Fraud

March 1, 2025, 10:52 am

Byju Raveendran, the founder and CEO of Byju’s, has finally spoken out. In an emotional LinkedIn post, he defended himself and shared his side of the story. He began with, “I am the Byju of BYJU’S”, and explained how things went wrong. He claimed the situation was being misrepresented and revealed that he sold all his personal assets “to keep his mission alive.”

Calls for an Investigation

Raveendran demanded a “thorough investigation” into alleged wrongdoing by Glas Trust, consulting firm EY, and former resolution professional Pankaj Srivastava. He accused them of fraud and collusion in Byju’s insolvency process.

In his post, he wrote, “I am the Byju of BYJU’S, and I am here now. I should have been here sooner. But I was too busy building my company. Then I was too busy saving everything I built. I have long been wanting to connect with you directly. But I was waiting for justice to be done and truth to prevail. Today, I do not want to wait. Today, I cannot wait.”

His statement came after a whistleblower from EY India posted on LinkedIn. The whistleblower accused EY of working with Glas Trust and Srivastava to take control of Byju’s.

Raveendran further alleged, “Me and several employees received a document with conclusive evidence of criminal collusion between EY India, which I otherwise held in high regard, Glas Trust, which claims to represent the lenders it does not represent, and the IRP (resolution professional Srivastava) who was appointed by an Indian court to protect Byju’s but ended up destroying it.”

He urged authorities to act quickly, saying, “I am sure a thorough investigation of this evidence will reveal the truth. I request the authorities to take that up immediately.”

Legal Battles Intensify

Byju’s insolvency has triggered multiple legal disputes. Last month, Srivastava approached the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) to challenge the disciplinary action recommended against him by the Bengaluru bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).

Meanwhile, Raveendran’s brother, Riju Raveendran, and other former promoters also moved the NCLAT. They opposed an NCLT ruling that reinstated Glas Trust and Aditya Birla Finance in the company’s Committee of Creditors (CoC).

On January 29, the NCLT overturned Srivastava’s decision to exclude Glas Trust and Aditya Birla Finance from the CoC. The tribunal also ordered disciplinary proceedings against him.

Byju’s LinkedIn Post Removed

Shortly after Raveendran’s statement, his LinkedIn account was taken down. His wife and Byju’s co-founder, Divya Gokulnath, reacted by posting, “Byju’s post and account were taken down. Investigating why. But no problem. Here we go again :)”

Rise and Fall of Byju’s

Raveendran was once a leading figure in India’s edtech boom. He secured investments from global firms, including Sequoia Capital and Mark Zuckerberg’s Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.

His journey began in 2005 when he started tutoring students in Bengaluru. His classes became so popular that he had to conduct them in stadiums to accommodate large crowds. Eventually, he turned his venture into a digital platform, focusing on math, science, and English.

During the pandemic, Byju’s expanded aggressively. The company acquired Great Learning, Epic!, and Aakash Educational Services in 2021. By early 2022, its valuation had skyrocketed to $22 billion.

Financial Crisis and Bankruptcy

However, financial troubles soon followed. A Bloomberg report revealed that rising US Federal Reserve interest rates increased Byju’s borrowing costs. At the same time, banks that had been financing customer loans withdrew their support. Since many students relied on these loans to pay for long-term courses, Byju’s lost a crucial revenue stream.

By late 2022, delays in financial disclosures alarmed lenders. The company entered negotiations to avoid defaulting on its US-issued debt. The situation worsened in mid-2023 when creditors sued Byju’s Alpha in a Delaware court. They sought control over a subsidiary that allegedly held unspent loan funds.

In response, Byju’s stopped making interest payments and accused creditors, including Redwood Capital Management, of fabricating a crisis.

Ongoing Legal Battles

The legal struggles have severely impacted Byju’s. The company now faces two US bankruptcy cases and multiple lawsuits in India. These setbacks have also raised serious doubts about Raveendran’s leadership.

SC Questions Byju’s: ‘Why Settle Only BCCI’s Rs. 15,000 Crore Due?’

September 26, 2024, 1:54 pm

The Supreme Court has raised concerns over why troubled ed-tech giant Byju’s opted to settle its debts exclusively with the BCCI while facing a total debt of Rs. 15,000 crore. The court criticized the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) for not adequately reviewing the situation when it closed insolvency proceedings against Byju’s.

On August 2, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) granted Byju’s relief by approving a settlement of Rs. 158.9 crore with the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). This move was a significant boost for founder Byju Raveendran, allowing him to regain control of the company. However, the relief was short-lived, as the Supreme Court stayed the NCLT’s decision on August 14, following an appeal from Glas Trust Company LLC, a U.S.-based creditor of Byju’s. The Supreme Court instructed the BCCI to deposit the settlement amount into a separate bank account.

“The company is in debt of Rs. 15,000 crore. When the quantum of the debt is so large, can one creditor (BCCI) walk away saying one promoter is ready to pay me?” questioned Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, leading a bench that included Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra. The bench indicated it might refer the Byju’s case back to the appellate tribunal.

“Why pick up BCCI and settle with them only from your personal assets? The NCLAT accepts this all without applying its mind to it,” the bench remarked.

The Supreme Court’s hearing regarding the U.S. firm’s appeal commenced on Wednesday and is set to continue today.

Senior advocate Shyam Divan, representing Glas Trust LLC, argued that the NCLAT should not have halted the insolvency proceedings after the BCCI accepted the settlement, labeling the funds paid to the BCCI as “tainted.” In defense of Byju’s, advocates Abhishek Singhvi and N.K. Kaul contended that the payment came from Riju Raveendran, Byju Raveendran’s brother, from his personal finances, and asserted that there was no wrongdoing in the NCLAT’s decision to conclude the insolvency case.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the BCCI, supported this viewpoint, stating that the cricket board received its dues from the personal assets of an individual.

Earlier, the U.S. firm claimed that the interim resolution professional (IRP) handling Byju’s insolvency case had improperly removed it from the committee of creditors. It alleged that its 99.41% stake in the company had been reduced to zero by the IRP, while those with only 0.59% now retained control.

Under the “team sponsor agreement” established in 2019 between Byju’s and the BCCI, the ed-tech company was required to pay a sponsorship fee for the exclusive rights to feature its brand on the Indian cricket team’s kit. While payments continued until 2022, Byju’s defaulted on the ₹158.9 crore sponsorship fee afterward, having met its obligations until mid-2022.

Byju’s Employees Struggle Amid Insolvency, Face Unpaid Salaries And Uncertainty

August 22, 2024, 5:14 pm

Byju’s, once a shining star in the edtech industry, now finds itself embroiled in a financial crisis that has left thousands of employees struggling to make ends meet. As the company faces insolvency, unpaid salaries and halted operations have sparked growing desperation among its workforce.

Employees Left in Financial Limbo

Many of Byju’s 27,000 employees have gone unpaid for months, leading to mounting financial stress. Sukirti Mishra, a 29-year-old mathematics teacher, is among those who have stopped taking classes. “There’s no point in doing charity for the company anymore,” Mishra said, highlighting her struggles to pay medical bills and loan installments.

The frustration among employees is palpable. After three months without pay, some are considering street protests or legal action to demand their dues.

The Legal Battle and Company Assurances

The Supreme Court is set to hear the insolvency case on Thursday, with the company’s US lenders pushing for repayment of $1 billion in dues. Meanwhile, Byju Raveendran, the company’s founder, assured employees in an internal memo that salaries would be paid promptly once control is regained. However, with assets frozen and the board suspended, employees fear that recovery could take months, leaving them in financial uncertainty.

The Downfall of a Tech Giant

Founded in 2011, Byju’s quickly rose to prominence, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, when online learning became essential. The company was valued at $22 billion in 2022 and attracted global investors. However, it is now embroiled in a bitter dispute with US lenders, leading to its current financial woes.

Investors, including Dutch technology firm Prosus, have accused Raveendran of mismanagement, although he denies any wrongdoing. The ongoing disputes have severely impacted the company’s operations, leaving employees and teachers uncertain about their future.

Employee Actions and Concerns

In response to the crisis, around 280 employees have approached a state grievance panel, demanding action on unpaid salaries and accusing the company of failing to pay taxes deducted from their wages. “We are deeply concerned about the company’s financial stability,” they wrote in an August 5 letter, expressing fears that Byju’s may shut down operations without settling their dues.

What Lies Ahead?

The future of Byju’s remains uncertain, with the potential for liquidation or a new buyer emerging. However, the law does not guarantee that employees will recover all their dues, leaving many in a precarious position as they wait for a resolution to the company’s financial crisis.

From Prominence To Bankruptcy: A Look At Five Major Corporate Failures In India

July 19, 2024, 6:51 pm

After the tumultuous journey of past several months, edutech firm Byju’s seems to be nearing its endgame. On July 16, the National Company Law Tribunal’s (NCLT) Bengaluru bench admitted a petition by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), seeking insolvency proceedings against the Byju Raveendran-promoted company.

This follows a petition against Byju’s over alleged unpaid dues of Rs 158 crore to the BCCI related to a sponsorship contract that Byju’s had with the top cricket body for the Indian cricket team.

A number of companies/individuals have faced financial implications and had undergone bankrupcy in the past. Here’s a look back to 5 of them:

1. Dewan Housing Finance Ltd. (DHFL)

Founded in 1984 by Rajesh Kumar Wadhawan, Dewan Housing Finance Ltd. (DHFL) aimed to provide housing finance to lower and middle-income groups in India’s tier 2 and tier 3 cities. For over 30 years, DHFL demonstrated significant growth and even acquired Deutsche Postbank Home Finance.

However, the company faced serious issues when it diverted Rs. 31,000 crores from loans into various shell companies for the personal gain of its promoters, including Kapil Wadhawan, Aruna Wadhawan, and Dheeraj Wadhawan. DHFL also made substantial donations to political parties, possibly to maintain their protection. For example, Rs. 14,282 crores were diverted to shell companies under the guise of slum development rehabilitation.

In 2019, DHFL defaulted on bond payments and Rs 900 crore in interest payments, leading to a drastic drop in stock prices by over 97%. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) intervened, superseding DHFL’s board and initiating a resolution under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, with the Piramal Group eventually taking over the company.

2. Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. (BPSL)

Established in 1970, Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. (BPSL) rose to prominence as a major steel manufacturer in India. Between 2007 and 2014, the company raised over Rs. 47,204 crores from 33 banks and financial institutions to support its expansion. Despite maintaining growth and profitability, BPSL continuously missed payment deadlines.

By April 2019, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) found that funds were being funneled into 200 shell companies, leading to significant non-performing assets (NPAs) for the banks. This financial mismanagement forced the company into the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). Ultimately, BPSL was auctioned off to JSW Steel, which proposed a Rs. 19,700 crore repayment plan, resulting in banks incurring a 60% loss on their loans.

3. Essar Steel

Part of the Essar Group, founded in 1969 and owned by the Ruia family, Essar Steel initially encountered financial trouble in 2002, requiring Corporate Debt Restructuring for a Rs. 2,800 crore debt. The company recovered by 2006 but fell into debt again by 2015, accumulating Rs 42,000 crore in liabilities. The company’s efforts to overcome the debt were hampered by falling commodity prices.

In June 2017, Essar Steel was listed among 12 stressed accounts by the RBI, necessitating insolvency proceedings under the IBC. The company was eventually auctioned and acquired jointly by ArcelorMittal and Japan’s Nippon Steel, and was rebranded as ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India (AM/NS India).

4. Lanco Infra

Founded in 1986 by Lagadapati Amarappa Naidu and his nephew Lagadapati Rajagopal, Lanco Infra expanded into power generation, transportation, solar energy, and coal mining, becoming one of the fastest-growing infrastructure companies in the world. By 2010, Lanco was India’s first independent power producer and its largest private power provider.

However, policy changes by the UPA government in 2012 led to a drastic reduction in merchant power tariffs, affecting Lanco’s revenue. By March 2017, 60% of the company’s expenses were interest payments. In June 2017, Lanco Infra was listed among the 12 stressed accounts by the RBI and subsequently faced insolvency proceedings under the NCLT.

5. Alok Industries

Founded in 1986, Alok Industries emerged as a leading textile manufacturer in India. The company initially experienced good growth and profitability. However, it made several strategic errors, such as borrowing Rs. 10,000 crores in 2004 for new plants instead of optimizing existing ones, and investing in real estate in Lower Parel, Mumbai, during a market downturn post-2008 financial crisis.

Continuous losses and rising debt exacerbated the company’s troubles, resulting in Rs. 30,000 crores in dues. Reliance and JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company won the bid for Alok Industries with a Rs. 5000 crore resolution plan.

BCCI Takes Byju’s To Bankruptcy Court Over ₹158 Crore Unpaid Sponsorship Dues

July 16, 2024, 12:31 pm

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Bengaluru has admitted the Board of Control for Cricket in India’s (BCCI) plea to initiate insolvency proceedings against Byju’s, the ed-tech giant, over unpaid dues of Rs 158 crore. This amount is part of a sponsorship contract for the Indian cricket team’s jerseys.

Background of the Case

In September last year, BCCI filed an application with the NCLT against Think & Learn Pvt Ltd, the parent company of Byju’s, for defaulting on dues close to ₹160 crore. The dispute centers around the sponsorship rights of the Indian cricket team’s jerseys.

Current Status and NCLT Order

The case was officially registered by the bankruptcy tribunal on November 15 for further hearings. According to the NCLT order dated November 28, 2023, a general notice was issued to Byju’s via email on January 6, 2023, regarding the default amount of Rs 158 crore, excluding TDS (tax deducted at source)

Previous Sponsorships and Renewals

Byju’s had key branding partnerships with the BCCI, the International Cricket Council (ICC), and the Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA). However, none of these sponsorships were renewed in 2023.

Ministry of Corporate Affairs Inspection

In July 2023, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) directed the office of the Regional Director in Hyderabad to inspect Think & Learn Pvt Ltd. In June, the MCA clarified that proceedings against BYJU’S under the Companies Act, 2013, were ongoing and no final conclusion should be drawn. Reports suggesting BYJU’S had been cleared of financial fraud were deemed “factually incorrect and misleading.”

Conclusion

As the case progresses, the focus remains on resolving the alleged unpaid dues between BCCI and Byju’s, with further hearings scheduled at the NCLT Bengaluru bench.

Byju’s Faces Ongoing Fraud Investigation, Government Refutes Clean Chit Reports

June 26, 2024, 10:26 pm

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has clarified that the investigation into allegations of financial misconduct against edtech giant Byju’s is ongoing and has not concluded, contrary to recent media reports suggesting otherwise.

In response to claims circulating in the media that Byju’s had been cleared of financial fraud, the MCA issued a statement on June 26 categorically denying these assertions. The ministry emphasized that no final decision has been made in the investigation, which was initiated under the Companies Act, 2013.

Earlier reports, including one from Bloomberg on June 26, indicated that the MCA’s year-long probe had not found evidence of fund diversion or financial manipulation at Byju’s. However, the investigation did uncover deficiencies in corporate governance practices within the company, which have reportedly contributed to its financial challenges.

The MCA’s statement cautioned against drawing premature conclusions, reaffirming that the investigation process is ongoing and all aspects related to Byju’s financial affairs are still under scrutiny.

The developments highlight ongoing regulatory scrutiny in India’s edtech sector, where Byju’s remains a prominent player despite recent challenges.

From Boom to Bust: The Journey of Indian Edtech Startups

June 10, 2024, 3:12 pm

India’s edtech sector experienced a meteoric rise post-2016 after the launching of Jio, fueled by increased internet penetration and substantial funding. The meteoric rise and subsequent decline of edtech startups in India serve as a compelling case study of the complexities inherent in revolutionizing education through technology.

While these startups initially seemed poised to transform the educational landscape, several critical factors contributed to their downfall. This article delves into the reasons behind the failures of prominent edtech companies, analyzes their strengths and weaknesses, and explores the potential for future growth by adopting best practices from developed countries.

After Jio’s launch in 2016, the period until 2018 was a golden era for edtech startups in India. These companies received millions in funding, and customer acquisition costs were only 20-25% of the revenue per course sold. For instance, a course priced at ₹60,000 had an acquisition cost of approximately ₹15,000, yielding a gross profit of ₹45,000. In contrast, physical coaching centers charged three times as much due to overhead costs like rent, teachers’ salaries, maintenance, and staff wages. Edtech startups, on the other hand, paid for course creation once by recording videos and then selling these videos repeatedly, avoiding recurring expenses like rent.

The COVID-19 pandemic temporarily boosted online education demand as schools and coaching centers shut down, but this was short-lived. Once normalcy resumed, many edtech startups struggled with unsustainable business models.

One of the primary strengths of edtech startups was their ability to leverage technology to provide accessible, affordable, and personalized learning experiences. They offered a wide range of courses, from K-12 to Govt job preparation, JEE, NEET & other test preparations, and upskilling, catering to diverse learner needs. Additionally, the scalability of their business models allowed them to reach students across the country, bridging geographical barriers.

As the edtech market expanded, numerous new players entered with substantial funding, leading to intense competition. To stay competitive, these companies began offering significant discounts, advertising extensively on social media and TV, and providing additional services like live doubt sessions. However, these strategies increased their customer acquisition costs, resulting in diminished or no profits, and eventually led to a financial downturn.

One of the most significant pitfalls for edtech startups has been their insufficient understanding of the end users’ needs. Successful educational solutions require a deep awareness of the challenges faced by students, teachers, and educational institutions. Many startups, however, overlooked this fundamental aspect, leading to products that did not effectively address the actual problems in education. This disconnect between product development and user requirements often resulted in poor user engagement and satisfaction.

Furthermore, the quality of content was often overlooked, with some startups prioritizing technology over content creation, resulting in user disengagement. The emphasis on aggressive marketing and discounting strategies also raised concerns about financial sustainability, as customer acquisition costs skyrocketed.

The successful launch of an edtech solution goes beyond its technological components. Startups often fail to consider the complexities involved in integrating their products into existing educational structures. Resistance to change and lack of adequate training for teachers significantly hindered the adoption process. Without addressing these implementation obstacles, even the most technologically advanced solutions struggled to gain traction.

In education, content is king. The success of an edtech platform heavily relies on the quality, relevance, and engagement level of its content. Some startups prioritized technological innovation over content creation, resulting in a dearth of high-quality material. This imbalance led to user disengagement and, ultimately, platform abandonment. Ensuring a steady supply of compelling and effective educational content is crucial for retaining users.

The user experience is paramount for any tech-based platform. Many edtech startups failed to prioritize a seamless user interface, intuitive navigation, and responsive design. When users encounter difficulties in accessing or using the platform, frustration mounts, and they are likely to abandon the service. A smooth and enjoyable user experience is essential for maintaining user interest and satisfaction.

The educational landscape is constantly evolving, with new technologies, learning styles, and instructional approaches emerging regularly. Startups that failed to stay abreast of these changes quickly became outdated. Flexibility and adaptability are critical for long-term success in the edtech sector. Companies that could not pivot in response to shifting educational trends found themselves unable to meet the evolving needs of their users.

Financial sustainability is a common struggle for many edtech businesses. While initial investments might spur growth, having a well-defined strategy for long-term revenue generation is crucial. Many startups did not have a viable business plan, leading to financial instability and eventual failure. The intense competition and high customer acquisition costs further exacerbated these challenges, making it difficult for startups to sustain their operations.

A notable gap exists between entrepreneurs and educators, often stemming from their diverse backgrounds. Entrepreneurs sometimes approached teachers in a condescending manner, which undermined the potential for productive collaboration. Building a respectful and collaborative relationship with educators is essential for developing solutions that genuinely meet their needs and gain their support.

Meanwhile, a parallel ecosystem thrived on YouTube, where educational content creators offered high-quality videos for free, supported by Google AdSense and endorsements. With almost zero customer acquisition costs and minimal operational expenses, these creators managed to sustain their offerings even as larger edtech startups faced significant challenges.

The rise and fall of India’s ed-tech startups serve as a cautionary tale, highlighting the need for a balanced approach that integrates technology with traditional teaching methods. By focusing on core user needs, addressing infrastructural challenges, prioritizing content quality and user experience, and fostering collaboration between entrepreneurs and educators, the Indian education system can pave the way for more sustainable and impactful innovations. As India continues to evolve, the lessons learned from this saga can help ensure that technology serves as a powerful enabler of learning rather than a fleeting trend.

From Billion-Dollar Valuation To Zero: Byju’s Plunge Stuns Industry

June 8, 2024, 12:02 pm

This could be a shock to many, edtech firm Byju’s, which was once valued at $22 billion is now worth zero, according to a research note by financial firm HSBC.

HSBC has assigned zero value to investment company Prosus’ nearly 10 per cent stake (or about $500 million) in Byju’s.

“We assign zero value to Byju’s stake amid multiple legal cases and funding crunch,” according to the HSBC note.

“Previously we valued around 10 per cent stake in Byju’s by applying an 80 per cent discount to the latest publicly disclosed valuation,” the note added.

The edtech firm is struggling to pay salaries to employees amid legal battles.

Byju’s is facing multiple headwinds. We and other shareholders are working every day to improve the situation. We are in close discussions with the company every day,” a senior Prosus executive was quoted as saying in reports late last year.

In fact, Byju’s was preparing to go public in early 2022 through an SPAC deal that would’ve valued the company at $40 billion.

In January this year, US-based investment firm BlackRock cut the value of its holding in Byju’s to a mere $1 billion from $22 billion in early 2022.

BlackRock owns less than 1 per cent of Byju’s.

Earlier this week, a consortium of creditors filed a petition in a US court to declare bankruptcy for newly affiliated entities linked to Byju’s US subsidiary, asserting that these entities are failing to fulfil their financial obligations.

Layoffs In India’s Tech: Ola, Flipkart, Byju’s, Swiggy Among 20 Companies Cutting Jobs In 2024

June 6, 2024, 3:29 pm

The layoffs in India’s tech market is experiencing significant layoffs, along with other global job market. Large new-age companies such as Swiggy, Ola, and Paytm have been cutting down their workforce since January 2024. Here is a compilation of Indian firms that have laid off their employees this year:

Simpl Layoffs

In May 2024, Simpl, a buy-now-pay-later platform, laid off around 160-170 employees, accounting for approximately 25% of its total workforce. The layoffs were reported by MoneyControl and were part of the company’s efforts to streamline operations.

Ola Cabs Layoffs

Ride-hailing giant Ola Cabs terminated around 200 employees in April 2024, representing about 10% of its workforce. This move was aimed at improving profitability. Additionally, Ola’s CEO Hemant Bakshi resigned just three months after his appointment, adding to the company’s tumultuous period.

Byju’s Layoffs

Facing financial challenges, ed-tech platform Byju’s laid off 500 employees in April 2024, which constituted 3% of its total workforce. The layoffs affected roles in sales, marketing, and teaching. Reports indicated that the layoffs were conducted over phone calls followed by emails.

Swiggy Layoffs

In January 2024, Swiggy, the online food delivery company, cut around 400 jobs. The layoffs were part of a strategy to improve the company’s finances. Although Swiggy’s food delivery business had been profitable for several quarters, the startup was not profitable at the group level.

Flipkart Layoffs

In the same month, Walmart-owned Flipkart fired between 1,100 and 1,500 employees, reducing its workforce by 5-7%. According to an Economic Times report, the company had also paused fresh hiring over the past year to manage costs.

Good Glam Group Layoffs

Content-to-commerce platform Good Glam Group laid off 150 employees, about 15% of its workforce, in April 2024. The job cuts were part of a new organizational framework aimed at streamlining operations and eliminating redundancies.

Other Notable Layoffs in Indian Firms

Several other Indian firms have also announced job cuts in 2024:

PrepLadder and Scaler: These ed-tech companies announced job cuts.
Wint Health, Lentra, and Muvin: Fintech startups that laid off employees.
HealthifyMe and Pristyn Care: Health industry firms that announced job cuts.
Cult.fit and Cure.fit: Fitness startups that trimmed their workforce.
Bolt.Earth, CoRover, Airmeet, WayCool, Licious, and BlissClub: Other startup companies that reduced their workforce this year.

The wave of layoffs in India’s tech and startup sector highlights the challenging economic environment and the companies’ efforts to adapt to changing market conditions.

Byju’s instructs 14,000 Employees To WFH; Closes All Offices Except HQ : Report

March 12, 2024, 12:18 pm

Byju’s has instructed its 14,000 employees to adopt a work-from-home arrangement, closing down all its offices except the headquarters in Bengaluru amid the ongoing crisis.

According to sources, Byju’s has vacated all office premises across the country, except the IBC Knowledge Park in Bengaluru, where over 1,000 employees are based. This process has been underway for several months, involving the non-renewal of contracts for offices in various cities as part of cost-cutting measures.

Despite this, approximately 300 of Byju’s tuition centers, physical spaces where students in classes 6-10 study, will continue their operations.

Facing cash-flow challenges and entangled in a dispute with creditors over a $1.2 billion loan, Byju’s, once valued at over $20 billion, has witnessed a significant decline in its valuation, estimated to be around 90 percent over the past year.

Last month, major stakeholders in Byju’s voted to remove Byju Raveendran from his position as CEO, stripping him of his role. Byju’s contested this move, claiming the resolution was passed in a meeting attended only by a “small cohort of select shareholders,” asserting that the resolutions were invalid and ineffective.

Byju’s Raveendran has lost support from key investors amid various crises, including the resignation of auditor Deloitte over corporate governance issues and legal disputes with US lenders. In a communication to staff last month, Mr. Raveendran mentioned the firm’s inability to process February salaries due to funding being blocked by investors.

Byju’s investors suit against CEO Raveendran; History, factors behind decline of the company

February 23, 2024, 3:46 pm

Four shareholders took legal steps by submitting a mismanagement and oppression suit against Raveendran to the National Company Law Tribunal, aiming to oust him from the company on Friday. This action follows a Karnataka High Court ruling in favor of the CEO. This development aligns with an emergency meeting convened among Byju’s investors, where they are on the verge of voting on the potential removal of CEO Raveendran and his family from the company’s board of directors. The Raveendran family disputes the legitimacy of this extraordinary general meeting (EGM) initiated by shareholders. The suit presented by the shareholders not only calls for the dismissal of Raveendran but also advocates for a forensic audit of the company, the appointment of a new board, and the annulment of the rights issue.

About Company: BYJU’S was established in 2011 under the name Think and Learn Pvt. Ltd, with founder Byju Raveendran leading the way as an educator and engineer. Headquartered in Bangalore, India, and maintaining offices in Palo Alto, CA, the company rapidly rose to prominence as a global leader in the ed-tech sector, securing a position among the top 5 most-valued private internet companies in India.

The company’s flagship product, BYJU’S – The Learning App, made its debut in India in 2015, gaining immense popularity and currently reaching over 100 million registered students globally, boasting 6.5 million annual paying subscribers. Students dedicate an average of 71 minutes per day to engage with educational content on the platform. In 2019, BYJU’S expanded its offerings with the launch of the Disney. BYJU’S Early Learn App in India, designed to provide personalized and interactive programs tailored for young learners.

Raveendran’s innovative methods quickly garnered attention from both students and investors, resonating with learners’ individual needs. Major investors, including the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and Sequoia Capital, joined in, propelling Byju’s into a billion-dollar startup and reflecting the high expectations for the future of online education in India.

Successes and Setbacks

Despite the initial success, Byju’s faced challenges during its rapid expansion. Corporate governance issues surfaced, impacting the company’s reputation. Allegations of unethical accounting practices and mishandling of user data tarnished its image. Deloitte, the company’s auditor, resigned due to delayed financial statement submissions, and independent directors departed from the board. These challenges resulted in defaults on loans and counter-lawsuits against creditors, underscoring the need for robust corporate governance.

Upsurge during the Pandemic

The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic presented both opportunities and challenges for Byju’s. The shift to remote learning led to a surge in demand for online education platforms. Byju’s responded by introducing ‘Live Classes,’ replicating the traditional classroom environment and attracting millions of students. Aggressive acquisitions, including the $300 million WhiteHat Jr deal and successful fundraising campaigns during the pandemic, further strengthened the company’s position.

Unforeseen Challenges

However, as the pandemic subsided, Byju’s encountered unexpected challenges. The anticipated sustained demand for ed-tech solutions in India did not materialize as expected. Cultural preferences for traditional classroom-based learning, the persistent digital divide, and limited internet access hindered the adoption of online learning. Byju’s reported a loss of $327 million in 2021, prompting concerns about its financial stability. Despite gaining popularity, Byju’s faced severe criticism for its marketing strategies, exploiting parental fears about their children’s academic future. Disturbing allegations, including the targeting of first-generation learners and aggressive sales strategies, fueled public outrage.

The Downfall

Accumulating allegations, diminished demand for online learning, and technical glitches led Byju’s into a crisis. The company’s financial situation deteriorated, and investor confidence dwindled. Once valued at $22 billion, Byju’s stock plummeted to $5.1 billion, with key investors like Prosus NV significantly reducing their stake. In a bid to salvage the company, Raveendran took strategic steps, such as appointing a new auditor and seeking new shareholders. However, these measures alone couldn’t address the fundamental issues plaguing corporate governance and the business models.

Byju’s business head resigns amid reorganization at the struggling startup

August 29, 2023, 2:28 pm

Prathyusha Agarwal, the Chief Business Officer of Byju, and two other top executives have quit as the struggling Indian ed-tech startup, restructures its business and operations, according to a company representative on Tuesday.

Agarwal joined Byju’s from Zee Entertainment Enterprises in February 2022. Himanshu Bajaj and Mukut Deepak, two additional business heads, have also left the company, which was previously India’s most valued startup.

“As BYJU’S continues to chart its path to profitability and sustainable growth, we have undertaken a restructuring of businesses and verticals including the consolidation of four verticals into two key verticals – K-10 and Exam Prep,” the spokesperson said.

The departures were first reported by the Indian news website Moneycontrol earlier in the day. Byju’s has laid off hundreds of workers this year as it deals with a slew of legal and financial issues.

The difficulties grew after investor Prosus NV stated that the company’s management “regularly disregarded advice” despite repeated efforts by the former director of the Dutch-listed software firm to improve governance.

Deloitte, which was scheduled to audit Byju’s until 2025, also resigned due to the company’s “long-delayed” financial results, noting a “significant impact” on its ability to undertake audits in accordance with acceptable standards. According to reports, Byju’s will announce 2022 audited earnings in September and 2023 results in December.