Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has stirred controversy with a bold declaration that could put his name at stake. During a public rally in Dera Ghazi Khan, Punjab, he emphatically claimed that if Pakistan does not surpass India in economic growth and development, his name “won’t be Shehbaz Sharif.”

Known for his energetic speeches, Mr. Sharif became highly animated at the podium, waving his arms and thumping his chest as he passionately addressed the crowd.

Promises of Development and a Pledge on Nawaz Sharif’s Life

Assuring citizens of his government’s commitment to national progress, Mr. Sharif stated:

“We will work day and night to ensure the situation in Pakistan improves. The Almighty has always blessed Pakistan.”

However, in a moment of intense rhetoric, he added:
“My name won’t be Shehbaz Sharif if due to our efforts Pakistan does not leave India behind.”

He further reinforced his commitment by invoking his brother, former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif:
“I am Nawaz Sharif’s fan, his follower. Today, I swear on his blessed life that till the day I have the energy and the will to do so, we will all work together to take Pakistan to greatness and defeat India.”

Pakistan’s Economic Struggles and Infrastructure Plans

During his visit, Mr. Sharif announced new infrastructure projects aimed at addressing the region’s economic challenges. Pakistan is grappling with a severe financial crisis and massive international debt, leading to tough austerity measures.

Backlash on Social Media

His statement quickly gained traction on social media, with many critics calling it a hollow promise. Users on platform X mocked his claim, pointing out Pakistan’s economic struggles and lack of substantial progress.

Contradictory Stance on India

Less than two weeks before this speech, Mr. Sharif had advocated for renewed dialogue with India. However, India has consistently maintained that discussions can only happen if Pakistan eliminates terrorism from its soil. As India’s Ministry of External Affairs reiterated, “Talks and terror cannot go hand-in-hand.”