<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
    
        <item>
            <title>SC TO HEAR HARASSMENT CASE AGAINST JUDGES ON 15 NOV - The Daily Guardian</title>
            <link>https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/others/sc-to-hear-harassment-case-against-judges-on-15-nov/</link>
            <guid>https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/others/sc-to-hear-harassment-case-against-judges-on-15-nov/</guid>
            <pubDate>September 1, 2022, 2:22 pm</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court has directed its Secretary-General to respond in a case relating to the enquiry mechanism into sexual harassment cases against sitting and retired judges. A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, A S Oka, and Vikram Nath, ordered the Secretary-General to file his reply within four weeks on the issue after senior advocate [&hellip;]
]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The Supreme Court has directed its Secretary-General to respond in a case relating to the enquiry mechanism into sexual harassment cases against sitting and retired judges.</p>



<p>A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, A S Oka, and Vikram Nath, ordered the Secretary-General to file his reply within four weeks on the issue after senior advocate Indira Jaising said that the Secretary-General was yet to file an affidavit. Jaising also said she would like to file some additional material relating to the latest developments on evolving a mechanism within the judiciary to handle such complaints.</p>



<p>The apex court has now posted the matter for hearing on November 15.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The top court was hearing a plea filed by a law intern in 2014 accusing a former Supreme Court judge of sexual harassment. The judge had obtained a gag order against the media from the Delhi High Court in January 2014 to prevent them from publishing any content that “highlights the allegations” made by the victim.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/gettyimages-495064503-612x612-1.jpg" type="image/jpeg" width="612" height="408"/>
            <dc:creator>TDG Network</dc:creator>
            <category></category>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>