<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
    
        <item>
            <title>SC asks Centre to look into plea to change name of India to Bharat - The Daily Guardian</title>
            <link>https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/others/sc-asks-centre-to-look-into-plea-to-change-name-of-india-to-bharat/</link>
            <guid>https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/others/sc-asks-centre-to-look-into-plea-to-change-name-of-india-to-bharat/</guid>
            <pubDate>June 4, 2020, 1:53 am</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to entertain a petition that sought changing the name of India to Bharat, and asked the Centre to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide on it. The three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde observed that Article 1 of the Constitution already refers to India [&hellip;]
]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to entertain a petition that sought changing the name of India to Bharat, and asked the Centre to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide on it.</p>



<p>The three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde observed that Article 1 of the Constitution already refers to India as Bharat. “But India is already called Bharat in the Constitution,” said the bench, directing the appropriate ministry to consider the petition as a representation and take the decision.</p>



<p>Petitioner told the court: “Repeatedly, the name India has been sought to be excluded. It is not been derived from within India, but is a name of Greek origin derived from the word ‘Indica’. Please allow me to make a representation in this regard.”</p>



<p>While the top court refused to pass any orders, it observed: “Bharat and India, both names already there in the Constitution. India is already called Bharat in the Constitution.”</p>



<p>The plea sought an amendment to Article 1 of the Constitution by replacing “India” with “Bharat” or “Hindustan”, claiming it will “instill a sense of pride in our own nationality”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Panel-Supreme-court.jpg" type="image/jpeg" width="1200" height="675"/>
            <dc:creator>Ashish Sinha</dc:creator>
            <category></category>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>