<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
    
        <item>
            <title>Renotify 27% seats reserved for OBCs in local body polls, SC tells Maharashtra poll panel - The Daily Guardian</title>
            <link>https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/others/renotify-27-seats-reserved-for-obcs-in-local-body-polls-sc-tells-maharashtra-poll-panel/</link>
            <guid>https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/others/renotify-27-seats-reserved-for-obcs-in-local-body-polls-sc-tells-maharashtra-poll-panel/</guid>
            <pubDate>December 16, 2021, 4:38 am</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered Maharashtra State Election Commission to issue a fresh notification to treat 27% seats reserved for Other Backward Classes (OBC) as general category for local body polls and commence the election process. A Bench of Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and C.T. Ravikumar asked S﻿tate Election Commission to renotify the 27% OBC [&hellip;]
]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered Maharashtra State Election Commission to issue a fresh notification to treat 27% seats reserved for Other Backward Classes (OBC) as general category for local body polls and commence the election process.</p>



<p>A Bench of Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and C.T. Ravikumar asked S﻿tate Election Commission to renotify the 27% OBC constituencies as general seats and resume the election process along with the remaining 73%. On 6 December, the Bench had stayed the 27% reservation for the OBC in the local body elections of Maharashtra until further orders.</p>



<p>It had observed that 27% of OBC Quota could not have been implemented without setting up a commission and without collecting data regarding the inadequacy of representation local government wise.</p>



<p>The apex court was hearing petitions challenging the Maharashtra Ordinance which introduced a 27% OBC quota in the State’s local body elections and the consequent notifications issued by the State Election Commission to give effect to the same.</p>



<p>In September, the Maharashtra government had brought an ordinance to ensure reservation to OBC candidates of rural local body elections six months after the Supreme Court struck down the 27% reservation available stating that it breached the cap mandated by the top court.</p>



<p>The government promulgated the Ordinance to amend the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 and Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act for Zilla Parishads, Panchayat Samiti and Gram Panchayats.</p>



<p>On 4 March, the apex court ruled that the reservation for OBC in local bodies should not result in exceeding the 50% cap in reservation quota mandated by it.</p>



<p>The pleas contended that the Ordinances provide for 27% reservation to the category of Backward Classes of Citizens was contrary to the judgements of the top court.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            <media:content url="https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/supreme-court.jpg" type="image/jpeg" width="1200" height="675"/>
            <dc:creator>Correspondent</dc:creator>
            <category></category>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>