<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed><author name="Shubhra Tripathi"><item><title>The Extravagant Bharat</title><link>https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/opinion/the-extravagant-bharat/</link><pubDate>October 9, 2023, 8:50 am</pubDate><category>Opinion</category><excerpt>Article 1 of Constitution of India 1949, begins with the decree stating “India that is Bharat shall be union of state.” The question is why it can’t be “Bharat that is India” what else could be the perfect start that this? If we look at the etymol...</excerpt></item></author></feed>