<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed><author name="Rahul Kumar"><item><title>Interpreting ‘Serious Irregularity’ under Section 90 of the Bahamas Arbitration Act 2009: What Privy Council held?</title><link>https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/legally-speaking/interpreting-serious-irregularity-under-section-90-of-the-bahamas-arbitration-act-2009-what-privy-council-held/</link><pubDate>July 1, 2021, 7:44 am</pubDate><category>Legally Speaking</category><excerpt>INTRODUCTION In&amp;nbsp;RAV Bahamas Ltd and another v. Therapy Beach Club Incorporated1 (“RAV Bahamas”), a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Bahamas that upheld the arbitral award was overturned by the privy council on the ground of “Serious irr...</excerpt></item><item><title>Enka Insaat vs Chubb: What UK Supreme Court affirmed?</title><link>https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/legally-speaking/interpreting-serious-irregularity-under-section-90-of-the-bahamas-arbitration-act-2009-what-privy-council-held/</link><pubDate>July 1, 2021, 7:44 am</pubDate><category>Legally Speaking</category><excerpt>INTRODUCTION The five-judge bench of UK Supreme Court on 9 October 2020 pronounced a landmark ﻿judgment in&amp;nbsp;Enka Insaat Vs Sanayi AS vs OOO Insurance Company Chubb&amp;nbsp;[2020] UKSC 38,&amp;nbsp;which is considered to be a leading authority in the ...</excerpt></item><item><title>INDIA’S APPROACH TO EQUALISATION LEVY</title><link>https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/legally-speaking/interpreting-serious-irregularity-under-section-90-of-the-bahamas-arbitration-act-2009-what-privy-council-held/</link><pubDate>July 1, 2021, 7:44 am</pubDate><category>Legally Speaking</category><excerpt>The 2016 equalisation levy was the result of the Official Committee constituted by Government of India (Committee on Taxation of E-Commerce) that presented its report on 3rd February 2016. The main factors that necessitated this review was the nee...</excerpt></item><item><title>“USTR 301 investigation &amp;#038; it’s effect on unilateral DST”﻿</title><link>https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/legally-speaking/interpreting-serious-irregularity-under-section-90-of-the-bahamas-arbitration-act-2009-what-privy-council-held/</link><pubDate>July 1, 2021, 7:44 am</pubDate><category>Legally Speaking</category><excerpt>The unilateral imposition of digital service tax has sparked a debate amongst all the countries. Where on one hand, the OECD/G20 model is consistently working on bringing global consensus for taxability of digital economies many countries have opt...</excerpt></item><item><title>Remembering the Mahatma as an eminent lawyer</title><link>https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/legally-speaking/interpreting-serious-irregularity-under-section-90-of-the-bahamas-arbitration-act-2009-what-privy-council-held/</link><pubDate>July 1, 2021, 7:44 am</pubDate><category>Legally Speaking</category><excerpt>‘Throughout my career at the bar I never once departed from the strictest truth and honesty. The first thing which you must always bear in mind, if you would spiritualize the practice of law, is not to make your profession subservient to the inter...</excerpt></item><item><title>Judging ‘under stress’: What it does to judges</title><link>https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/legally-speaking/interpreting-serious-irregularity-under-section-90-of-the-bahamas-arbitration-act-2009-what-privy-council-held/</link><pubDate>July 1, 2021, 7:44 am</pubDate><category>Legally Speaking</category><excerpt>“The judiciary as a robust and independent branch of government with judges who are impartial, independent, and free from the improper external influences that, whatever their provenance, can no longer be tolerated.” There is little question that ...</excerpt></item></author></feed>