DELIVERING FACTS OR ALTERING PERCEPTIONS?https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/legally-speaking/delivering-facts-or-altering-perceptions/January 4, 2022, 8:42 amhttps://latest.thedailyguardian.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/legally.jpgLegally SpeakingIn a world of multi-screening, where TED talks threaten to replace books and lectures,”, the generation’s ephemeral interests celebrate performance and storytelling over factual accuracy. Writing in The Guardian, Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic argues tha...Synthesizing the expanding horizons of Article 21: Are the civil liberties truly infallible?https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/legally-speaking/delivering-facts-or-altering-perceptions/January 4, 2022, 8:42 amhttps://latest.thedailyguardian.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/legally.jpgLegally SpeakingOften characterised as ‘the procedural Magna Carta protective of life and liberty’, Article 21, in our living Constitution, is the most organic and progressive provision. Embodying the ‘constitutional value of supreme importance in a democratic so...Burqa ban: Is it a legitimate restraint or an outrageous curtailment of individual rights?https://latest.thedailyguardian.com/legally-speaking/delivering-facts-or-altering-perceptions/January 4, 2022, 8:42 amhttps://latest.thedailyguardian.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/legally.jpgLegally SpeakingINTRODUCTION While women should choose what they wear, such decisions should not be forced by the state. The difference between rights and forcefully imposed-rights is a policymaker’s intention of genuine welfare. While the central tenet of democr...